Lichtenstein technique versus transinguinal preperitoneal mesh prosthesis (TIPP): less chronic pain?

ISRCTN ISRCTN93798494
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN93798494
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
12/11/2008
Registration date
23/12/2008
Last edited
26/03/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Mr Giel G Koning
Scientific

St Elisabeth Hospital
Department of Surgery
Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
Tilburg
5022 GC
Netherlands

Study information

Study designDouble-blind randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleThe Tilburg double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing inguinal hernia repair according to Lichtenstein and the transinguinal preperitoneal technique
Study acronymTULIP
Study objectivesThe transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) technique will show reduction of chronic pain compared to the Lichtenstein technique.
Ethics approval(s)1. Medical Ethical Testing Committee (METC) of St Elisabeth Hospital and TweeSteden Hospital gave approval on the 28th November 2007 (ref: 0737)
2. Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (CCMO) Central Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects gave approval on the 24th September 2007 (ref: NL16781.008.07)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedUnilateral groin hernia
InterventionAll patients will be operated via anterior approach with a skin incision two centimetres above the Poupart ligament.

In half of the study population the groin hernia will be corrected according to the Lichtenstein technique. This is the reference treatment advised by the Dutch Society of Surgeons. The Lichtenstein technique will be attempted to present-day insights; a soft mesh will be used instead of the polypropylene mesh.

The other 150 inguinal hernia patients will be operated by the transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) technique with Polysoft® mesh. In this technique an inguinal incision 4 - 5 cm long is made, the external oblique aponeurosis is divided and the cord lifted on a tape. The cremaster muscle is divided around the internal orifice, but not stripped, and the sac is dissected. The technique of placement of the Polysoft® mesh into the preperitoneal space adapts anatomically to the type of hernia.

Type of hernia will be assessed using the European Hernia Society groin hernia classification. This classification is simple and easy to remember. The size of the hernia orifice is registered as 1 (less than or equal to 1 finger), 2 (1 - 2 fingers) or 3 (greater than or equal to 3 fingers) accompanied with L (lateral), M (medial) or F (femoral). All of the hernias will be primary (P) classified according to the inclusion criteria so recurrent (R) will not be assessed in our population.

In indirect hernias high dissection of the sac is performed and the sac is thus reduced in the preperitoneal space (PPS) through the internal ring. Blunt dissection is carried out in the PPS, through the internal orifice and is then extended deep to epigastric vessels and transverse fascia, in the direction of the pubic spine, beyond its level. The patch is introduced in the PPS via the internal orifice. In regional or local anaesthesia asking the patient to strain allows correct anatomical spreading of the mesh, which is applied to the deep aspect of the fascia. The assessment is done by asking the patient to strain and to cough. External oblique aponeurosis was repaired superficial to the cord to restore the normal anatomy.

In direct hernias, after division of the cremaster so as to check the internal orifice for an indirect sac, the transverse fascia is divided circularly around the hernia bulge and the sac is reduced. Blunt dissection is carried out in the PPS, medially in the direction of the pubic spine and laterally behind the epigastric vessels in direction of the iliac spine. The patch is introduced through the transverse fascia opening and spread in the PPS so as to cover all the weak inguinal area. When an indirect sac, even if it is small, is associated to the direct one, both sacs are dissected and reduced.

Total duration of treatment: 1 day in hospital on day of surgery. Outpatient department follow-up at 14 days, 3 months and 1 year post-operatively in both arms of trial.

Joint Sponsor:
TweeSteden Hospital (The Netherlands)
P.O. Box 90107
Tilburg
5000 LA
Netherlands
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureDirect post-operative and chronic pain, measured post-operatively during hospital admission and at 14 days/3 months and one year; final measurement will be after follow up completion of the last patient in both groups.
Secondary outcome measures1. Operation time
2. Post-operative complications
3. Hospital stay
4. Return to daily activities (e.g. work)
5. Recurrence

Measured post-operatively during hospital admission and at 14 days/3 months and one year; final measurement will be after follow up completion of the last patient in both groups.
Overall study start date01/12/2008
Completion date01/12/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants300 patients
Key inclusion criteria1. Primary unilateral groin hernia
2. Aged greater than 18 years, either sex
3. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) classification 1 - 3
4. Signed informed consent letter
Key exclusion criteria1. Recurrent hernia
2. Aged less than 18 or greater than 80 years
3. Scrotal hernia(s)
4. ASA classification greater than 4
5. Acute incarcerated inguinal hernia(s)
6. Psychiatric disease or other reason making follow-up or questionnaires unreliable
Date of first enrolment01/12/2008
Date of final enrolment01/12/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

St Elisabeth Hospital
Tilburg
5022 GC
Netherlands

Sponsor information

St Elisabeth Hospital (Netherlands)
Hospital/treatment centre

Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
Tilburg
5022 GC
Netherlands

Email g.koning@elisabeth.nl
Website http://www.elisabeth.nl
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/04gpfvy81

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

St Elisabeth Hospital (Netherlands)

No information available

TweeSteden Hospital (Netherlands)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 25/09/2009 Yes No
Results article results 01/06/2013 Yes No