Effect of voltage escalation and shock wave rate during stone treatment

ISRCTN ISRCTN95762080
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN95762080
Secondary identifying numbers 089/10
Submission date
17/06/2010
Registration date
06/07/2010
Last edited
30/06/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Beat Roth
Scientific

Urology Department (Urologische Universitätsklinik)
Inselspital
Bern
3010
Switzerland

Study information

Study designSingle-centre prospective randomised controlled single-blind interventional study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use contact details below to request a patient information sheet [in German]
Scientific titleRandomised, single blinded trial to compare immediate versus delayed voltage escalation and the effect of different shock wave rates during shock wave lithotripsy of single kidney or ureteral stones
Study objectivesIn animal models delayed voltage escalation during shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones has been shown to be more effective, with a concurrent lower rate of renal damage (subcapsular or perirenal hematomas). These animal studies suggest that low-energy shock waves might provide a beneficial effect by priming the stones for fragmentation by the following higher energy waves. Therefore, a delayed voltage increase might be more effective for the stone fragmentation with concurrent lower energy dose and lower kidney damage.
For ureteral stones, energy adaptation did not show any beneficial effect. But as in kidney stones, a lower shock wave rate might have a beneficial impact. We therefore postulate, that shock wave frequency of 60 shocks per minute has a better outcome in ureteral stone patients than a shock wave rate of 90 shocks per minute and for renal calculi, a voltage escalation shock wave lithotripsy has a better outcome than a immediate voltage escalation.
Ethics approval(s)Bern Ethics Committee (Ethikkommission Bern), May 2010, ref: 089/10
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedUrinary stone treatment with shock wave lithotripsy
InterventionShock wave lithotripsy of ureteral and renal calculi. Duration of treatment is about 1h and there is only one single treatment per patient.
The follow up is done by ultrasound, blood samples, x-rays and urinary examination 1 day and three months after the intervention.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureStone disintegration/stone clearance after 3 months
Secondary outcome measures1. Secondary treatments or interventions for the same stone
2. Perirenal/subcapsular hematomas
3. Complications according to the Dindo-Clavien system
4. Microalbumin and Beta-2 microglobulin measurement as a marker of renal damage (proximal tubulus/glomerular)
Outcomes will be measured at 1 day and 3 months after the intervention.
Overall study start date01/07/2010
Completion date31/12/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants640
Key inclusion criteria1. Patients with renal or ureteral stones scheduled for shock wave lithotripsy
2. Patients > 20 years of age
3. Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Pregnancy
2. < 20y of age
3. Anticoagulation or aspirin medication
4. Urinary tract infection
5. Stones > 2cm (indication for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy [PCNL] or Ureteroscopic stone treatment)
Date of first enrolment01/07/2010
Date of final enrolment31/12/2011

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Switzerland

Study participating centre

Inselspital
Bern
3010
Switzerland

Sponsor information

Inselspital, University Hospital Berne (Switzerland)
Hospital/treatment centre

c/o Beat Roth
Urology Department (Urologische Universitätsklinik)
Bern
3010
Switzerland

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01q9sj412

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Inselspital, University Hospital Berne (Switzerland) - Urology Department (Urologische Universitätsklinik)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/02/2016 Yes No