Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
Improving maternal and newborn health in low-income settings requires both health service and community action. Previous community initiatives have generally been rural, but India is urbanizing. While working with health services to improve their quality of care, the trial tests an intervention in which slum-dweller womens groups try to improve health during pregnancy and birth, and for newborn babies in their own communities.
Who can participate?
Key participants will be women who join the community groups. We will try to involve young women and mothers, but older women may also get involved. Group members will reach out to other women and key stakeholders in their neighbourhoods. Since the aim is to improve the health of pregnant women and their newborn infants, any participant who may influence this situation may be involved. Particular examples may be older women, male community members and leaders, health workers and local opinion formers. The project outcomes will be measured by checking for all births and deaths in the project areas. All women and their newborn infants will be eligible to participate in this process, which will involve an interview as close to delivery as possible.
What does the study involve?
We will employ local community-based female facilitators to convene groups and help them to explore maternal and neonatal health issues. The groups will meet fortnightly through a seven-phase process of sharing experiences, discussion of the issues raised, discovery of potential community strengths, building of a vision for action, design and implementation of community strategies, and evaluation. The process is one of learning from each other and solving problems together.
48 slum areas have been selected randomly. 24 will have womens groups. 24 will not, but both sets of areas will benefit from health service quality improvement. We will collect information about births, healthcare and outcomes in all 48 areas and compare the two sets. We are particularly interested in seeing if the womens groups make mothers more likely to have antenatal care and safe deliveries, and improve the survival of their babies.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
We dont know if the womens groups will improve mother and baby health. They have not been tested enough for us to have an opinion on whether they will be successful in a city. Since the trial is part of the City Initiative for Newborn Health, all the areas involved will benefit from improvement of provision and quality of maternal and newborn services at health posts, maternity homes, peripheral hospitals and tertiary hospitals.
Where is the study run from?
SNEHA (Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study started in October 2006 and ended in September 2009.
Who is funding the study?
The Wellcome Trust.
Who is the main contact?
Neena Shah More. SNEHA, Urban Health Centre, 60 Feet Road, Dharavi, Mumbai 400 017, Maharashtra, India.
David Osrin. Institute for Global Health, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
Trial website
Additional identifiers
EudraCT number
ClinicalTrials.gov number
Protocol/serial number
06PC02
Study information
Scientific title
Cluster-randomised controlled trial of community mobilisation in Mumbai slums to improve care during pregnancy, delivery, postpartum and for the newborn
Acronym
CINH Community Mobilisation
Study hypothesis
Will a community mobilisation intervention improve maternal and neonatal home care, service uptake, morbidity and mortality in slum communities of Mumbai?
Ethics approval
Approval is implicit in an agreement between the implementing NGO (Society for Nutrition, Education and Health Action - SNEHA, Mumbai) and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, which covers the activities of the City Initiative for Newborn Health, of which the trial is one component.
Specific ethics approval was gained from the Independent Ethics Committee for Research on Human Subjects (IECRHS), Mumbai on the 18 June 2007 (ref: 1433).
Study design
Cluster randomised controlled trial
Primary study design
Interventional
Secondary study design
Randomised controlled trial
Trial setting
Other
Trial type
Quality of life
Patient information sheet
Condition
Maternal and child health
Intervention
The intervention comprises a series of meetings of community women's groups in 24 slum clusters. It is delivered by community facilitators employed by the project. Its duration in this form will be from January 2007 to January 2009. However, the aim of the intervention is to stimulate sustainable community participation, and we would hope that the intervention continues indefinitely through local efforts.
In each intervention cluster, a facilitator will convene community groups to explore maternal and neonatal health issues. Groups will meet once or twice monthly and move through action research cycles.
The programme inputs can be itemised as:
1. Recruitment, training, supervision and remuneration of facilitators. The role of the facilitator is to activate and strengthen groups, support them in identifying problems, help to plan possible solutions and support the implementation and monitoring of solution strategies in the community. Although she requires a grasp of health issues and some knowledge of potential interventions, she needs to be a facilitator rather than a teacher. As such, she may act as a broker of information and communication but her prime importance is as a catalyst for community mobilisation
2. Development of tools for conducting group meetings, process evaluation and documentation
3. Recruitment, training, supervision and remuneration of a supervisory cadre to support the community-based facilitators
The control group (24 slum clusters) do not receive an analogous intervention. Control areas benefit from the health service provision activities of the City Initiative for Newborn Health: improved maternal and newborn care at health posts, maternity homes, general hospitals and tertiary hospitals.
Intervention type
Other
Phase
Not Applicable
Drug names
Primary outcome measures
Neonatal mortality rate.
Outcomes will be evaluated after 2 years of data collection, but are measured continuously through the same prospective registration system. Births in the 48 clusters under surveillance are identified by local women, who notify interviewers employed by the project. An interview is taken at 6 weeks postpartum for each birth. The registration system provides data on maternal survival, stillbirths and neonatal outcomes. It also provides data on care during pregnancy, delivery and postpartum, both at home and through health services.
Secondary outcome measures
Antenatal, delivery and postnatal care uptake.
Outcomes will be evaluated after 2 years of data collection, but are measured continuously through the same prospective registration system. Births in the 48 clusters under surveillance are identified by local women, who notify interviewers employed by the project. An interview is taken at 6 weeks postpartum for each birth. The registration system provides data on maternal survival, stillbirths and neonatal outcomes. It also provides data on care during pregnancy, delivery and postpartum, both at home and through health services.
Overall trial start date
01/01/2007
Overall trial end date
01/01/2010
Reason abandoned
Eligibility
Participant inclusion criteria
Women who give birth in 48 vulnerable slum communities during the study period. Any woman who gives birth in the study area is potentially a participant in the data collection activities. The age range would be 12 to 49 years.
Participant type
Patient
Age group
Adult
Gender
Female
Target number of participants
10,000 (end recruitment date is 01/01/2009)
Participant exclusion criteria
Women who decline to be interviewed.
Recruitment start date
01/01/2007
Recruitment end date
01/01/2010
Locations
Countries of recruitment
India
Trial participating centre
30 Guilford Street
London
WC1N 1EH
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Organisation
The Institute of Child Health (UK)
Sponsor details
University College London
30 Guilford Street
London
WC1N 1EH
United Kingdom
Sponsor type
University/education
Website
Funders
Funder type
Industry
Funder name
ICICI Bank Ltd (India) - Social Initiatives Group
Alternative name(s)
Funding Body Type
Funding Body Subtype
Location
Funder name
The Wellcome Trust (UK) (grant ref: 081052)
Alternative name(s)
Funding Body Type
Funding Body Subtype
Location
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Not provided at time of registration
Intention to publish date
Participant level data
Not provided at time of registration
Results - basic reporting
Publication summary
1. 2008 results in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18261242
2. 2012 community mobilisation results in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22802737
3. 2012 stillbirth and newborn death results in http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22646304
Publication citations
-
Results
More NS, Bapat U, Das S, Patil S, Porel M, Vaidya L, Koriya B, Barnett S, Costello A, Fernandez A, Osrin D, Cluster-randomised controlled trial of community mobilisation in Mumbai slums to improve care during pregnancy, delivery, postpartum and for the newborn., Trials, 2008, 9, 7, doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-7.
-
Community mobilisation results
More NS, Bapat U, Das S, Alcock G, Patil S, Porel M, Vaidya L, Fernandez A, Joshi W, Osrin D, Community mobilization in Mumbai slums to improve perinatal care and outcomes: a cluster randomized controlled trial., PLoS Med., 2012, 9, 7, e1001257, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001257.
-
Stillbirth and newborn death results
Bapat U, Alcock G, More NS, Das S, Joshi W, Osrin D, Stillbirths and newborn deaths in slum settlements in Mumbai, India: a prospective verbal autopsy study., BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2012, 12, 39, doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-39.