A randomised controlled trial comparing the effect of ADmission Cardiotocography versus intermittent Auscultation of the foetal heart Rate on low-risk women on admission to labour ward showing signs of possible labour

ISRCTN ISRCTN96340041
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN96340041
Secondary identifying numbers RP/2006/55
Submission date
20/02/2008
Registration date
25/03/2008
Last edited
11/05/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Mr Declan Devane
Scientific

School of Nursing & Midwifery
National University of Ireland
Galway
-
Ireland

Email Declan.Devane@nuig.ie

Study information

Study designMulticentre two-group randomised trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeScreening
Participant information sheet Not yet available in web format as of 21/02/2008, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleFoetal cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation during labour ward admission: a randomised controlled trial and qualitative follow-up
Study acronymADCAR
Study objectivesThe admission cardiotocograph (ACTG), was introduced as a screening test to try and identify foetuses at greater risk of intrapartum asphyxia that might benefit from continuous electronic foetal monitoring (EFM) during labour. Contrary to recommendations that it should not be used for low-risk women (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists [RCOG] 2001), an Irish survey found that routine ACTGs were done in 96% of all maternity units in the Republic of Ireland (Devane, Lalor & Bonner 2007). There have been repeated calls for a thorough evaluation of the ACTG through adequately powered randomised trials. The ADCAR trial is designed to provide this evaluation.

Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference between admission cardiotocography (ACTG) and intermittent auscultation (IA) of the foetal heart, in low risk women on admission to the labour ward or labour assessment room in:
1. Caesarean section
2. Obstetric intervention, and
3. Neonatal morbidity

This trial will also explore women's experience of foetal monitoring modalities.
Ethics approval(s)1. Regional Ethics Committee - Health Services Executive, North Eastern Region (Ireland), July 2007
2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Research Ethics Committee, November 2007
3. Coombe Women and Infant's University Hospital, Dublin, Research Ethics Committee, February 2008
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedIntrapartum asphyxia
Intervention1. Control: 20 minute CTG on admission to labour ward/assessment room with signs of labour
2. Intervention: intermittent auscultation of the foetal heart, on admission to the labour ward/assessment room with signs of labour, using a Pinard stethoscope or a Doppler ultrasound device
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureIncidence of caesarean section, measured at or immediately after birth.
Secondary outcome measures1. Obstetric intervention to include:
1.1. Use of continuous EFM
1.2. Use of foetal blood sampling
1.3. Augmentation of labour with oxytocin
1.4. Augmentation of labour with artificial rupture of membranes (ARM)
1.5. Artificial rupture of membranes
1.6. Labour length
1.7. Epidural analgesia
1.8. Episiotomy
1.9. Opiate analgesia
1.10. Perineal trauma requiring repair (excluding episiotomy)
1.11. Estimated blood loss
1.12. Mode of birth
2. Neonatal morbidity to include:
2.1. Metabolic acidosis (defined as an umbilical artery blood pH less than 7.05, and a base deficit in the extracellular fluid compartment (BD) of greater than 12.0 mmol/l)
2.2. Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE)
2.3. Seizures
2.4. Use of anticonvulsants
2.5. Hypotonia
2.6. Apgar scores at one and five minutes
2.7. Admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
2.8. Length of stay in NICU (in days)
2.9. Length of neonatal ventilator days
2.10. Neonatal death
2.11. Stillbirth
2.12. Intracranial haemorrhage
2.13. Meconium aspiration
2.14. Renal failure
2.15. Neonatal resuscitation
3. Women's experience of foetal monitoring modalities

All outcomes will be measured at or immediately after birth except for the qualitative interviews which will be carried out 6 - 8 weeks post birth.
Overall study start date10/03/2008
Completion date10/06/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexFemale
Target number of participants5,776 (2,888 per group)
Key inclusion criteria1. Women between 37+0 and 40+6 completed weeks of pregnancy
2. Absence of antenatal, maternal and foetal risk factors to the development of neonatal encephalopathy, cerebral palsy or perinatal death as per RCOG, which warrant EFM
3. Greater than or equal to18 years
4. Ability to understand study information and willingness to give written, informed consent
5. Women participating in interviews must be able to converse in English
Key exclusion criteriaAny criteria that does not meet the inclusion criteria.
Date of first enrolment10/03/2008
Date of final enrolment10/06/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Ireland

Study participating centre

National University of Ireland
Galway
-
Ireland

Sponsor information

Health Research Board (HRB) (Ireland)
Government

73 Lower Baggot Street
Dublin
2
Ireland

Phone +353 (0)1 234 5000
Email hrb@hrb.ie
Website http://www.hrb.ie/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/003hb2249

Funders

Funder type

Government

Health Research Board (HRB) (Ireland) (ref: RP/2006/55)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Alternative name(s)
HRB
Location
Ireland
Department of Health and Children (Ireland)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article recruitment rates results 10/05/2015 Yes No