Back pain and Rescuer fatigue following CardioPulmonary Resuscitation by kneeling, standing on taboret, and standing postures

ISRCTN ISRCTN96900689
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN96900689
Secondary identifying numbers CLFHR9611
Submission date
27/11/2007
Registration date
18/12/2007
Last edited
08/04/2021
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Foo Ning Ping
Scientific

201, Taikang Village
Liou Ying township
Tainan
736
Taiwan

Study information

Study designRandomised, controlled, cross-over trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleBack pain and Rescuer fatigue following CardioPulmonary Resuscitation by different postures
Study acronymBRCPR
Study objectivesBack pain as an occupational disorder in health care providers has been well documented in the literature. But the association between back pain and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) was seldom studied. The objectives of this study were to determine whether different CPR postures including kneeling, standing, and standing on taboret are able to induce back pain in rescuers, and to compare differences in rescuer fatigue in three CPR postures.

Hypothesis:
Back pain and rescuer fatigue are different among three different postures of CPR.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the Institutional Review Board of Chi Mei Medical Center from 5th February 2007 to 16th February 2008 (ref: IRB09602-0011).
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedRescuer fatigue for resuscitation
InterventionCardiopulmonary resuscitation for 10 minutes by using kneeling, standing, and standing on taboret postures.

Since this is a prospective and cross-over trial, each of the participants should complete three different CPR posture within 3 weeks in one week apart. Therefore, each of the sequences of CPR should follow up for at least 48 hours, but the total follow-up period for each of them will be 3 weeks and two days.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure1. Severity of back pain (by Brief Pain Inventory Short Form), measured 24 hours and 48 hours post CPR
2. Rescuer fatigue (effective compression of cardiac massage) - detected by Laerdal Resusci-Anne® Skillreporter™ mannequin, measured during 10 minutes of cardiac massage
Secondary outcome measuresRange of motion of elbow and back with different CPR postures (detected by flexible goniometer), measured during 10 minutes of cardiac massage.
Overall study start date01/03/2007
Completion date31/12/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants60
Total final enrolment24
Key inclusion criteriaHealth care providers working at the Emergency Deparment that have:
1. Clinical work experience longer than 2 years
2. Experience of performing CPR for more than 20 times
Key exclusion criteriaCandidates with:
1. A herniated intervertebral disc
2. Previous spine surgery
3. Underlying anklyosing spondylitis or other autoimmune diseases
4. Current pregnancy
Date of first enrolment01/03/2007
Date of final enrolment31/12/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Taiwan

Study participating centre

201, Taikang Village
Tainan
736
Taiwan

Sponsor information

Chi Mei Foundation Medical Center (Taiwan) - Liou Ying Campus
Hospital/treatment centre

201, Taikang Village
Liou Ying Township
Tainan
736
Taiwan

Website http://www.chimei.org.tw/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/02y2htg06

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Chi Mei Foundation Medical Center (Taiwan) - Liou Ying Campus

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 01/05/2010 08/04/2021 Yes No

Editorial Notes

08/04/2021: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.