A prospective randomised, multicentre trial to assess the impact of laboratory based rapid diagnosis on outcome in patients with Blood Stream Infections

ISRCTN ISRCTN97107018
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN97107018
Secondary identifying numbers 11978
Submission date
25/10/2013
Registration date
25/10/2013
Last edited
21/12/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Blood stream infections (BSI) are a major problem and about 8% of hospital inpatients have a BSI. Some will be admitted with a BSI and others will develop an infection during their hospital stay. Recent improvements in infection control have reduced the number of patients that acquire an infection during their hospital stay, but BSI still occur. In certain infections the death rate can be as high as 50% and every patient that contracts an infection has a longer hospital stay. BSI are diagnosed by taking a blood sample from patients with a suspected infection. Antibiotic treatment begins within hours, but it takes several days to reach a definitive diagnosis and identify the correct antibiotic. The initial antibiotic selected will be a broad spectrum antibiotic, based on the clinician's judgment. However, until bacterial analysis is performed it is unknown if the correct antibiotic has been selected and there can be a time lag of up to 35 days before patients receive appropriate antibiotic therapy for their BSI. Use of the correct antibiotics has been shown to reduce death rates by up to 50% in some patient groups. This study will assess the impact of new technology designed to speed up laboratory diagnosis.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 and over, in hospital with a BSI.

What does the study involve?
Patients will be randomly allocated into two groups. One group will be tested using the current diagnostic approach and the other group will be tested with the current diagnostic approach and also the new rapid diagnostic technology.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration.

Where is the study run from?
Southmead Hospital (UK).

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
August 2012 to December2013.

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK).

Who is the main contact?
Dr Margaret Stoddart
Margaret.Stoddart@nbt.nhs.uk

Contact information

Dr Margaret Stoddart
Scientific

Department of Microbiology
Southmead Hospital
Southmead Road
Westbury-On-Trym
Bristol
BS10 5NB
United Kingdom

Email Margaret.Stoddart@nbt.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled interventional trial; Design type: Diagnosis
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleA prospective randomised, multicentre trial to assess the impact of laboratory based rapid diagnosis on outcome in patients with Blood Stream Infections
Study acronymRAPIDO
Study objectivesThe research is to find out whether more rapid identification of the pathogens involved in a blood stream infection can reduce the chance of dying in the 28days following infection.

It will also asses whether rapid identification results in:
1. Faster recovery
2. Shorter hospital stay
3. Shorter time before receiving the correct antibiotic
4. Differences in total antibiotic use
5. Differences in NHS costs and cost-effectiveness of acute care.

It will also assess whether differences in clinical outcomes are related to differences in the timing and appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy.

More details can be found at: http://public.ukcrn.org.uk/search/StudyDetail.aspx?StudyID=11978
Ethics approval(s)12/SW/003; First MREC approval date 20/03/2012
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: Infection; Subtopic: Infection (all Subtopics); Disease: Infectious diseases and microbiology
InterventionOnce a positive blood culture has been identified patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomised 1:1 to receive conventional diagnosis or rapid diagnosis. A web-based randomisation system will be used.

In each site samples allocated to conventional diagnosis will follow the usual SOPs directing the process in the individual Trusts.

The rapid diagnostic platform in all five sites will be MALDI-TOF technology. Where a sample has been randomised to the rapid diagnostic arm some of the sample will be retained and follow the conventional diagnostic pathway as well.

MALDI is a soft ionization technique used in mass spectrometry, allowing the analysis of organisms which tend to be fragile and fragment when ionized by more conventional ionization methods. The ionization is triggered by a laser beam (normally a nitrogen laser). A matrix is used to protect the bacteria from being destroyed by direct laser beam and to facilitate vaporization and ionization. MALDI-TOF spectra can then used for the identification of microorganisms. A colony of the microbe in question is smeared directly on the sample target and overlaid with matrix. The mass spectra generated are analysed by dedicated software and compared with stored profiles. Species diagnosis by this procedure is much faster, more accurate and cheaper than other procedures based on immunological or biochemical tests.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureTo assess the impact of laboratory based rapid diagnosis of Blood Stream Infections on 28-day all-cause mortality.
Secondary outcome measures1. To assess the impact of rapid diagnosis on all-cause mortality at 7 days
2. To assess the impact of rapid diagnosis on resolution of infection, measured by temperature
3. To assess the impact of rapid diagnosis on patient length of stay (days)
4. To assess the impact of rapid diagnosis on acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection within 28 days
5. To assess the impact of rapid diagnosis on in-hospital antibiotic consumption in the first 7 days
6. To assess the impact of rapid diagnosis on the NHS costs and cost-effectiveness of acute care
7. To assess the impact of rapid diagnosis on time to initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy and time to appropriate de-escalation of empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy
8. To investigate the relationship between the timing of appropriate antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes
Overall study start date01/08/2012
Completion date31/12/2013

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsUK Sample Size: 4536
Key inclusion criteria1. Age 18 years and over
2. Male and female
3. Blood culture positive for bacteria or fungi
4. Admitted to hospital
Key exclusion criteria1. Less than 18 years of age
2. Patients on the end of life pathway when the blood sample was taken
3. Previously randomised for this study as each patient will only be recruited once
4. Prisoners or young offenders in the custody of HM Prison Service in England or Wales.
5. Patients not recieving NHS care
6. Attending physician deems patient unsuitable
Date of first enrolment01/08/2012
Date of final enrolment31/12/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Southmead Hospital
Bristol
BS10 5NB
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

North Bristol NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

Trust Headquarters
Beckspool Road
Frenchay
Bristol
B16 1JE
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.nbt.nhs.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/036x6gt55

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR (UK) - Programme Grants for Applied Research; Grant Codes: PGfAR RP-PG-0707-10043

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Editorial Notes

21/12/2017: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.