ISRCTN ISRCTN97157037
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN97157037
Protocol serial number DTH-2017010
Sponsor Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
Funder National Natural Science Foundation of China
Submission date
09/06/2017
Registration date
13/06/2017
Last edited
10/07/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims:
Radicular pain is a type of pain that is caused by compression of a nerve in the spine. The pain is often felt in the area of the body that is supplied by that nerve, such as leg pain caused by compression of a nerve supplying the leg. Around 10-15% of patients with radicular pain undergo surgery to correct the problem eventually, however most use pain relieving drugs to control the pain levels. Diosmin is a type of plant chemical found mainly in citrus fruits, which is used for treating various conditions. It is thought to work by reducing inflammation (swelling). The aim of this study is to find out whether treatment with Diosmin may be effective in the treatment of radicular pain.

Who can participate?
Adults who have been diagnosed with radicular pain

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Those in the first group are treated with Diosmin for one month. Those in the second group are treated with a commonly used pain relieving treatment for one month. Participants in both groups are asked to rate their pain levels and satisfaction with treatment when they first receive their treatment and again after two and eight weeks.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants who receive the Diosmin may benefit from a reduction in pain and greater levels of satisfaction. There are no notable risks involved with participating.

Where is the study run from?
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (China)

When is study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
March 2008 to December 2011

Who is funding the study?
National Natural Science Foundation of China (China)

Who is the main contact?
Professor Yinhe Wang

Contact information

Prof Yinhe Wang
Scientific

Department of Orthopedic Surgery
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
Nanjing University Medical School
321 Zhongshan Road
Jiangsu
Nanjing
210008
China

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-2354-5049

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designNon-Inferiority randomised active-controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleA randomized controlled trial evaluating the effects of Diosmin in the treatment of radicular pain caused by lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion
Study objectivesDiosmin at a dose of 50 mg/kg/day may reduce the radicular pain from lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion and has no effect difference with currently used active treatment of mannitol plus dexamethasone.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics Committees of Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 30/08/2008, ref: DTH-2017010
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedRadicular pain
InterventionParticipants are randomised to one of two groups using a single randomisation technique.

Intervention group: Participants receive Diosmin (Nanjing Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd) per os, 900 mg, tid for 2 weeks followed by bid for 2 weeks, and lastly 450 mg bid as maintenance dose for at least one month.

Control group: Participants receive 20% mannitol (CR Double-Crane Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd) 250ml (1g/kg/day) and dexamethasone (Furuitang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd) 10 mg/day intravenous drops for the first 3 days and followed by mannitol for 4 days.

In the both groups, the course of treatment lasts for at least one month.

Participants in both groups rate their pain levels and satisfaction with treatment at initial drug administration and after two and eight weeks.
Intervention typeDrug
PhasePhase IV
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Diosmin
Primary outcome measure(s)

1. Perceived pain is measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a numerical rating scale (NRS) just after the administration of drugs, and two and eight weeks later
2. Self-rated physical disability is measured using the Roland-Morris questionnaire (RM-Q) just after the administration of drugs, and two and eight weeks later

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Patient’s satisfaction is measured using a three-grade scale ranging from completely satisfied (no pain at all time and no restriction of activities) to satisfied (slight pain that requires no medication and mild restriction of activities) to unsatisfied (moderate to severe pain that requires medication and moderate to severe restriction of activities) via telephone after two years.

Completion date01/12/2011

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration300
Key inclusion criteria1. Preliminarily diagnosis of radicular pain
2. Aged 18 years and over
3. Pain duration at least 30 days
4. Underwent routine discography
5. Previously treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioid medications or physical therapy without pain relief for more than one month
6. Normal or slight decrease in the height of disc space on lateral plain X-ray film
7. Initially considered eligible for surgical intervention
Key exclusion criteria1. Spondylolysis
2. Lumbar canal stenosis
3. Isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis
4. Inflammatory arthritis
5. Spinal instability
6. Infection from previous lumbar surgery
7. Neurologic disease
8. Tumor
9. Psychological disorders (such as depression or using antidepressant/anxiolytic medications)
Date of first enrolment01/01/2009
Date of final enrolment30/06/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • China

Study participating centre

Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital
Nanjing University Medical School
321 Zhongshan Road
Jiangsu
Nanjing
210008
China

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to the privacy of these data, but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/01/2017 Yes No
Basic results 13/06/2017 28/06/2017 No No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Additional files

ISRCTN97157037_BasicResults_13June17.pdf
Uploaded 28/06/2017

Editorial Notes

10/07/2018: Publication reference added.
28/06/2017: Internal review.