Immunogenicity and adjuvant effect of the whole cell Pertussis component of the Dutch combined Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Poliomyelitis - Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine in infants compared to the old whole cell P vaccine and a new acellular P vaccine component

ISRCTN ISRCTN97785537
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN97785537
Secondary identifying numbers LTR134
Submission date
02/05/2007
Registration date
02/05/2007
Last edited
23/09/2021
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr G. Berbers
Scientific

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)
P.O. Box 1
Bilthoven
3720 BA
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)30 274 2496
Email guy.berbers@rivm.nl

Study information

Study designInterventional, non-randomised, non-controlled, parallel group trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designSingle-centre
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typePrevention
Scientific titleImmunogenicity and adjuvant effect of the whole cell Pertussis component of the Dutch combined Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Poliomyelitis - Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine in infants compared to the old whole cell P vaccine and a new acellular P vaccine component
Study acronymaKwK trial
Study objectivesTo compare the immunogenicity of the whole cell (DTwP) versus the acellular (DTaP) pertussis component of the Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Poliomyelitis - Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTP IPV-Hib) vaccine as measured by the antibody titres at 11 months before the fourth vaccination and at 12 months.
Ethics approval(s)Approval received from the CCMO (Central Committee on Research inv.
Human Subjects) on the 18th October 2004 (ref: P04.1099C)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPertussis, whooping cough
InterventionFour groups of 75 children aged 11 months:
1. DTwP IPV-Hib primary series and booster (11 months) (n = 32)
2. DTwP IPV-Hib primary series and DTaP IPV-Hib booster (Infanrix) (n = 79)
3. DTaP IPV-Hib (Infanrix) primary series and booster (n = 95)
4. DTaP IPV-Hib (Pediacel) primary series and booster with (n = 75) and without (n = 75) pneumococcal vaccination (Prevenar)
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis, Poliomyelitis - Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTP IPV-Hib) vaccine
Primary outcome measureTo compare the immunogenicity of the whole cell versus the acellular pertussis component of the DTP IPV-Hib vaccine as measured by the antibody titres at 11 months before the fourth vaccination and at 12 months. The antibody titres are determined by a twofold serial dilution Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).
Secondary outcome measuresAntibody titres for all vaccine components are measured at 11 months before vaccination and at four to eight weeks after the fourth DTP IPV-Hib vaccination. This will also allow to investigate:
1. The effect of the changes in the production process of the Pertussis whole cell component compared to the ‘old’ whole cell component (data on file)
2. The adjuvant effect of the whole cell versus two different acellular Pertussis components in the DTP IPV-Hib vaccine as used in The Netherlands
3. The immunogenicity and the adjuvant effect of the two different acellular Pertussis components in the DTP IPV-Hib vaccines (Infanrix versus Pediacel) with or without pneumococcal vaccination (Prevenar)
Overall study start date03/11/2004
Completion date01/08/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
SexNot Specified
Target number of participants400
Key inclusion criteria1. Infants in good general health eligible for the fourth DTP IPV-Hib vaccination
Key exclusion criteria1. Severe acute illness or fever (greater than 38.5°C) within two days before vaccination
2. Present evidence of serious disease(s) demanding medical treatment that might interfere with the results of the study
3. Known or suspected allergy to any of the vaccine components
4. Known or suspected immune disorder
5. History of any neurological disorder, including epilepsy
6. Previous administration of plasma products (including immunoglobulins)
7. Previous vaccination with any other vaccine than those used in the National Immunisation Programme
Date of first enrolment03/11/2004
Date of final enrolment01/08/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)
Bilthoven
3720 BA
Netherlands

Sponsor information

National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM) (The Netherlands)
Government

P.O. Box 1
Bilthoven
3720 BA
Netherlands

Phone +31 (0)30 274 9111
Email info@rivm.nl
Website http://www.rivm.nl/en/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01cesdt21

Funders

Funder type

Government

The Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (The Netherlands)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Editorial Notes

23/09/2021: Proactive update review. No publications found. Search options exhausted.