Implementing simplified Neonatal Resuscitation Protocol - Helping Baby Breathe at Birth (HBB) - in a tertiary level hospital in Nepal for improved perinatal survival

ISRCTN ISRCTN97846009
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN97846009
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
07/08/2012
Registration date
15/08/2012
Last edited
14/02/2018
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Neonatal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Neonatal asphyxia is a medical condition that happens when a baby's brain and other organs do not get enough oxygen before, during or right after birth. This leads to almost a million deaths every year, which almost exclusively happen in low or middle income countries. For babies who are suffering from this lack of oxygen (hypoxia), a delay in receiving emergency care, such as resuscitation, can lead to severe disability in the child. This is a particular problem in these countries as a large number of births take place outside health facilities or without a skilled birth attendant present. In order to try to prevent disability and death, the American Academy of Paediatrics has developed an educational programme called “Helping Babies Breathe” (HBB). This training package is designed to train birth attendants in developing countries in essential skills of how to effectively treat hypoxia. The aim of this study is to find out whether an introduction of a simplified Neonatal Resuscitation Protocol (HBB) will improve the survival rate and overall outcome for babies suffering from hypoxia.

Who can participate?
Newborns delivered at Paropakar Maternity and Women's Hospital during the study period.

What does the study involve?
Birth attendants are provided with training in a simplified Neonatal Resuscitation Protocol (HBB), which is then used in the hospital. The number of neonatal deaths is counted over a six-month period when birth attendants are actively trained in the HBB practices. The results are then compared with a period of six months before the training began, and a period of three months after the active training ends.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
A potential benefit of participating in the study is improved care offered by the trained health professionals. There are no potential risks of participating in the study.

Where is the study run from?
Paropakar Maternity and Women's Hospital (Nepal)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
July 2012 to September 2013

Who is funding the study?
1. Laerdal Foundation (Norway)
2. Uppsala University (Sweden)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Ashish Kc
ashish.k.c@kbh.uu.se

Contact information

Dr Ashish KC
Scientific

Population Service International
Shree Mahalaxmi Sadan
GPO Box 21976
Mahalaxmisthan
Lagankhel
Lalitpur
-
Nepal

Email ashish.k.c@kbh.uu.se

Study information

Study designProspective cohort study with before and after design
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleEvaluating the implementation of a simplified Neonatal Resuscitation Protocol - Helping Baby Breathe at Birth (HBB) - in a tertiary level hospital in Nepal on perinatal outcome and survival using a before-after study design
Study objectivesThe introduction of a simplified Neonatal Resuscitation Protocol (HBB) will significantly improve perinatal outcome and survival in the study setting.
Ethics approval(s)1. Institutional Research Committee - Ministry of Health and Population in Nepal, ref: 2068-11-02BS
2. Ethical Review Board of Uppsala University, 15/08/2012, ref: 2012/267
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPerinatal mortality
InterventionAfter a six month baseline period a simplified algorithm for neonatal resuscitation at birth - Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) will be implemented in the hospital. In order to improve the adherence of the birth attendants towards this new guideline on neonatal resuscitation a framework of quality improvement cycle will be instituted.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measurePerinatal mortality
Secondary outcome measures1. Apgar score at 1, 5 and 10 minutes
2. Saturation at 5 and 10 minutes
3. Length of hospital stay
4. Performance of heatlh staff at resuscitation (time to initiation, time of effective ventiolation etc.)
5. Knowledge level and in-training performance of health staff
Overall study start date01/07/2012
Completion date30/09/2013

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNeonate
SexBoth
Target number of participants28000
Key inclusion criteriaAll newborns delivered at Paropakar Maternity and Women's Hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal during study period
Key exclusion criteriaDoes not meet inclusion criteria
Date of first enrolment01/07/2012
Date of final enrolment30/09/2013

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Nepal

Study participating centre

Population Service International
Lalitpur
-
Nepal

Sponsor information

Uppsala University (Sweden)
University/education

Department of Women's and Children's Health
University Hospital
Uppsala
75185
Sweden

Phone +46 (0)18 471 00 00
Email mats.malqvist@kbh.uu.se
Website http://www.uu.se/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/048a87296

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Laerdal Foundation (Norway)
Private sector organisation / Trusts, charities, foundations (both public and private)
Alternative name(s)
Laerdal Foundation
Location
Norway
Uppsala Universitet
Government organisation / Universities (academic only)
Alternative name(s)
Uppsala University, UU_University, Uppsala Universitet, Sweden, UU
Location
Sweden

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 05/10/2012 Yes No
Results article results 05/07/2015 Yes No
Results article results 10/09/2015 Yes No
Results article results 31/08/2016 Yes No
Results article results 31/01/2018 Yes No

Editorial Notes

14/02/2018: Publication reference added.
05/09/2016: Publication reference added.
15/04/2016: Publication reference added.