Submission date
12/02/2007
Registration date
16/02/2007
Last edited
03/05/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Retrospectively registered
? Protocol not yet added
? SAP not yet added
Results added
? Raw data not yet added
Study completed

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Type

Scientific

Contact name

Dr Jim McCambridge

ORCID ID

Contact details

Centre for Research on Drugs & Health Behaviour
Department of Public Health & Policy
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Keppel Street
London
WC1E 7HT
United Kingdom

Additional identifiers

EudraCT/CTIS number

IRAS number

ClinicalTrials.gov number

Protocol/serial number

1

Study information

Scientific title

Acronym

AUDIT

Study hypothesis

The primary hypothesis of this pilot study is that participants who complete the AUDIT assessment measure (Saunders et al, 1993) at the time of study entry, will report lower levels of hazardous drinking (AUDIT score) at follow up, compared to the control group. The secondary hypotheses are that participants who complete the AUDIT assessment measure at study entry, will report lower levels of alcohol consumption, problems and dependence at follow up, compared to the control group. In combination with the specific effects of reactivity to a brief measure, we will also evaluate the more general impact of participating in a study of alcohol consumption.

Saunders JB. Aasland OG. Babor TF. de la Fuente JR. Grant M. (1993) Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction 88(6):791-804.

Ethics approval(s)

King's College London

Study design

Trial

Primary study design

Interventional

Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Study setting(s)

Other

Study type

Prevention

Patient information sheet

Condition

Hazardous drinking

Intervention

AUDIT 10-item screening questionnaire

Intervention type

Other

Primary outcome measure

AUDIT score

Secondary outcome measures

1. Hazardous drinking (as measured by) AUDIT score greater than or equal to 8
2. Hazardous drinking 10 or more units on any day within the past week regardless of gender
3. Hazardous drinking at or above 14 units past week for women or 21 units for men
4. Total number of units consumed in past week
5. Total number of days alcohol was drunk in the past month
6. Dependence (as measured by Leeds Dependence Questionnaire[LDQ])
7. General Problems (as measured by Alcohol Problems Scale [APS])
8. Academic Problems (as measured by Academic Role Expectations and Alcohol Scale[AREAS])

Overall study start date

01/02/2006

Overall study end date

01/09/2006

Reason abandoned (if study stopped)

Eligibility

Participant inclusion criteria

University students aged 18-24

Participant type(s)

Patient

Age group

Adult

Lower age limit

18 Years

Upper age limit

24 Years

Sex

Both

Target number of participants

400

Participant exclusion criteria

None

Recruitment start date

01/02/2006

Recruitment end date

01/09/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

England, United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Centre for Research on Drugs & Health Behaviour
London
WC1E 7HT
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Organisation

King's College London (UK)

Sponsor details

CREC office
Room 7.21 James Clerk Maxwell Building
Waterloo Campus
King’s College London
57 Waterloo Road
London
SE1 8WA
England
United Kingdom

Sponsor type

University/education

Website

ROR

https://ror.org/0220mzb33

Funders

Funder type

Other

Funder name

Investigator-funded

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype

Location

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Not provided at time of registration

Intention to publish date

Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan

IPD sharing plan summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/02/2008 Yes No

Additional files

Editorial Notes