Contact information
Type
Scientific
Contact name
Prof Jeremy Dale
ORCID ID
Contact details
Centre for Primary Health Care Studies
University of Warwick
Coventry
CV4 7AL
United Kingdom
+44 (0)2476 524254
jeremy.dale@warwick.ac.uk
Additional identifiers
EudraCT/CTIS number
IRAS number
ClinicalTrials.gov number
Protocol/serial number
PSI E-21
Study information
Scientific title
Acronym
Study hypothesis
The aims of the study were:
1. To investigate the efficacy and safety of telephone assessment and advice to Category C (non-urgent) 999 ambulance service callers as an alternative to despatching an ambulance
2. To investigate the acceptability of telephone assessment and advice to Category C 999 ambulance service callers
3. To compare the efficacy, safety and acceptability of nurses and paramedics as providers of telephone advice to Category C 999 ambulance service callers
4. To model the cost consequences of telephone assessment and advice to Category C 999 ambulance callers
Ethics approval(s)
Not provided at time of registration
Study design
Randomised controlled trial
Primary study design
Interventional
Secondary study design
Randomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)
Other
Study type
Other
Patient information sheet
Condition
Computer-assisted telephone advice for emergency services
Intervention
Time blocks of 3-4 hours were allocated randomly within the constraints of staff availability to intervention sessions (nurse assessment and triage, or paramedic assessment and triage) and control sessions. During intervention sessions, nurses or paramedics trained in telephone consulting skills and using the TAS computerised decision support system assessed the patients' needs for emergency ambulances and, if appropriate, offered advice. The intervention ran in 'shadow' form (i.e. all ambulances were dispatched in the usual way), but calls assessed as appropriate for advice were given an opportunity to decline the ambulance.
Intervention type
Other
Primary outcome measure
1. Triage assessment made by the paramedic or nurse
2. Subsequent cancellation of ambulance
3. Caller/patient satisfaction
4. Health outcome
5. SF-12 one week after 999 call
6. Review of nurse/paramedic decision making by independent clinical panel
7. Economic analysis of findings. The findings indicate that the provision of telephone assessment and advice to Category C callers is both safe and acceptable to callers. Telephone assessment and advice could enable patients with no identified clinical need for an emergency ambulance to be offered more appropriate care for their presenting condition. In the ambulance services studied, this could lead to at least 7-10% of dispatches being cancelled, so enabling improved response times for patients with more critical or life-threatening needs. Nurses using computer assisted decision support were more effective at identifying patients not in need of emergency ambulance than were paramedics using the decision support. The savings in marginal costs to the ambulance service appear likely to outweigh the costs of providing the telephone triage intervention. There are also likely to be considerable savings to AEDs as a result of reduced attendances.
Secondary outcome measures
Not provided at time of registration
Overall study start date
01/04/1997
Overall study end date
01/04/2000
Reason abandoned (if study stopped)
Eligibility
Participant inclusion criteria
The trial was conducted at two sites: the London Ambulance Service and the West Midlands Ambulance Service. Data collection for the main study was undertaken over a period of 12 months. All calls to the 999 ambulance service prioritised by call-takers as presenting with non-urgent (Category C) problems during sampled sessions.
Participant type(s)
Patient
Age group
Other
Sex
Both
Target number of participants
Not provided at time of registration
Participant exclusion criteria
Not provided at time of registration
Recruitment start date
01/04/1997
Recruitment end date
01/04/2000
Locations
Countries of recruitment
England, United Kingdom
Study participating centre
Centre for Primary Health Care Studies
Coventry
CV4 7AL
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Organisation
Record Provided by the NHS R&D 'Time-Limited' National Programme Register - Department of Health (UK)
Sponsor details
The Department of Health
Richmond House
79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom
Sponsor type
Government
Website
Funders
Funder type
Government
Funder name
NHS Primary and Secondary Care Interface National Research and Development Programme (UK)
Alternative name(s)
Funding Body Type
Funding Body Subtype
Location
Results and Publications
Publication and dissemination plan
Not provided at time of registration
Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan
IPD sharing plan summary
Not provided at time of registration
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 01/03/2003 | Yes | No | |
Results article | 2, results | 01/10/2004 | Yes | No |