Submission date
08/12/2004
Registration date
24/01/2005
Last edited
15/09/2008
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Retrospectively registered
? Protocol not yet added
? SAP not yet added
Results added
? Raw data not yet added
Study completed

Plain English Summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study website

Contact information

Type

Scientific

Contact name

Prof Markus W Büchler

ORCID ID

Contact details

Im Neuenheimer Feld 110
Heidelberg
69120
Germany
+49 6221 56 6200
markus.buechler@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Additional identifiers

EudraCT/CTIS number

IRAS number

ClinicalTrials.gov number

Protocol/serial number

KSC 01/2002

Study information

Scientific title

Acronym

POUCH - Trial

Study hypothesis

The straight colo-anal anastomosis after LAR/TME is often associated with poor functional results in the first two years. With the Colon J-Pouch (CJP) better early post-operative results could be achieved, however, late evacuation problems occurred. Therefore, the transverse coloplasty pouch (TCP) was developed, which showed good functional results in the early and late post-operative period in phase I/II trials. The purpose of this trial is to compare the CJP with the TCP in terms of surgically related mortality and morbidity as well as functional outcome.

Ethics approval(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Study design

Randomised controlled trial

Primary study design

Interventional

Secondary study design

Randomised controlled trial

Study setting(s)

Hospital

Study type

Treatment

Patient information sheet

Condition

Rectal cancer

Intervention

Patients with rectal cancer of the lower two thirds, eligible for low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME).

Patients will be randomized intraoperatively to either the Colon J-Pouch or Transverse Coloplasty group if they are eligible for both. Postoperative follow-up will assess the safety of TCP and CJP after LAR/TME, including postoperative mortality, morbidity and functional results. Functional outcome will be monitored for 24 months. Each participant has to answer questionnaires about their neorectal function after certain time periods.

Intervention type

Other

Primary outcome measure

Not provided at time of registration

Secondary outcome measures

Not provided at time of registration

Overall study start date

01/06/2002

Overall study end date

30/06/2005

Reason abandoned (if study stopped)

Eligibility

Participant inclusion criteria

For inclusion in this trial, patients have to be eligible for low anterior resection with TME due to a tumour of the lower rectum (potential R0 resection). Presumed preservation and a normal function of the rectal sphincter with faecal continence pre-operatively are mandatory.

Participant type(s)

Patient

Age group

Not Specified

Sex

Not Specified

Target number of participants

130

Participant exclusion criteria

Not provided at time of registration

Recruitment start date

01/06/2002

Recruitment end date

30/06/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

Germany

Study participating centre

Im Neuenheimer Feld 110
Heidelberg
69120
Germany

Sponsor information

Organisation

University of Heidelberg Medical School (Germany)

Sponsor details

Im Neuenheimer Feld 110
Heidelberg
69120
Germany
+49 6221 56 6200
markus.buechler@med.uni-heidelberg.de

Sponsor type

University/education

Website

ROR

https://ror.org/038t36y30

Funders

Funder type

University/education

Funder name

University of Heidelberg Medical School (Germany)

Alternative name(s)

Funding Body Type

Funding Body Subtype

Location

Results and Publications

Publication and dissemination plan

Not provided at time of registration

Intention to publish date

Individual participant data (IPD) sharing plan

IPD sharing plan summary

Not provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article Functional results: 01/08/2005 Yes No
Results article Early results: 01/10/2008 Yes No

Additional files

Editorial Notes