Using the ISRCTN registry to track transparency
The ISRCTN registry wants to encourage trialists to follow research openness and transparency recommendations.
Registry records now display badges to highlight prospective registration, regular updating of ongoing records and posting protocols, statistical analysis plans (SAPs), data links and results to the record. The BEEP trial is an example that has several of the badges.
The transparency tracker provides a visual display of the transparency achieved by a set of records, found by a search of the registry. For any search click on 'View in tracker' to view the results in the transparency tracker. Here is an example of the transparency tracker for a search where the condition category = Cancer.
Do you think these new features are useful? We are keen to know what you think. Please complete our feedback form.
The ISRCTN registry is a primary clinical trial registry recognised by WHO and ICMJE that accepts all clinical research studies (whether proposed, ongoing or completed), providing content validation and curation and the unique identification number necessary for publication. All study records in the database are freely accessible and searchable.
ISRCTN supports transparency in clinical research, helps reduce selective reporting of results and ensures an unbiased and complete evidence base.
ISRCTN accepts all studies involving human subjects or populations with outcome measures assessing effects on human health and well-being, including studies in healthcare, social care, education, workplace safety and economic development. The registry welcomes submissions in English from any location. Studies should ideally be registered prospectively (before recruitment starts). ISRCTN also accepts studies registered retrospectively once they are underway or after completion.
Enhancing structural competency in school-based health centers to address LGBTQ+ adolescent health equity
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stepped care guided self-help followed by face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy versus standalone internet-delivered or face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety: a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial of the finnish first-line therapies–initiative
Understanding food provision and eating environments in English special schools: Assessment of nutritional quality of meals, and challenges in ideal provision and eating environments
.png)
.png)
