Wearing textured insoles in shoes to help selfmanagement for people with MS: an exploratory study of the effects on balance

ISRCTN ISRCTN02778739
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN02778739
Secondary identifying numbers 7926
Submission date
12/05/2010
Registration date
12/05/2010
Last edited
30/09/2013
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nervous System Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr John Dixon
Scientific

Health and Social Care Institute
Borough Road
Middlesbrough
TS1 3BA
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designSingle centre randomised interventional process of care trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeQuality of life
Scientific title
Study acronymTextured Insoles & Balance in MS Version 3
Study objectivesTo explore if wearing textured insoles in footwear can affect balance for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The overall context of the study is about the use of footwear as an aid to improving balance in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The results from this study on the effects of wearing insoles will serve to inform further work into the use of textured insoles to improve balance in people with MS.
Ethics approval(s)MREC approved on the 3rd June 2009 (ref: 09/H0903/35)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: Neurological; Subtopic: Neurological (all Subtopics); Disease: Nervous system disorders
InterventionThe project will see if wearing insoles with a rough texture in shoes can help people affected by multiple sclerosis. We will investigate two different textured insoles (using a smooth insole as a control) to see if either or both can change people's ability to maintain their balance when standing and when walking. We will study what happens the first time they wear the textured insoles and also after two weeks of wearing them.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureBalance
Secondary outcome measures1. Muscle activation
2. The effects on balance of wearing textured insoles for two weeks
Overall study start date01/07/2009
Completion date31/03/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned sample size: 50; UK sample size: 50
Key inclusion criteria1. Men and women aged between 18 - 65 years
2. Clinical diagnosis of MS
3. Can walk about 100 m with or without resting with the use of one stick or crutch
Key exclusion criteriaAny potential participant will be excluded from the study for any of the following reasons:
1. Diagnosis of other central nervous system condition
2. Musculoskeletal injury within last 6 weeks
3. Relapse of symptoms in the last three months
4. Reduced sensation in either or both feet of a degree that would preclude them perceiving the textures
5. Known allergy to or subsequent allergic reaction to hypoallergenic tape
6. Inability to understand instructions
7. Unable to walk 10 metres (11 yards) without resting, either unassisted or with one stick or crutch
8. Previous use of these or similar textured insoles
Date of first enrolment01/07/2009
Date of final enrolment31/03/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Health and Social Care Institute
Middlesbrough
TS1 3BA
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Multiple Sclerosis Society (UK)
Charity

Research and Development
372 Edgware Road
London
NW2 6ND
United Kingdom

Website http://www.mssociety.org.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/043fwdk81

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Multiple Sclerosis Society (UK)
Private sector organisation / Associations and societies (private and public)
Alternative name(s)
Multiple Sclerosis Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, The MS Society, MS Society UK, Multiple Sclerosis Society UK, MS Society
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/06/2014 Yes No