Impact of an online evidence retrieval system on decision-making in general practice

ISRCTN ISRCTN03597773
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN03597773
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
22/07/2005
Registration date
09/09/2005
Last edited
08/11/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Enrico Coiera
Scientific

Centre for Health Informatics
University of New South Wales
Sydney
2052
Australia

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleImpact of an online evidence retrieval system on decision-making in general practice
Study objectivesThe aim of this trial is to assess the effectiveness of an online evidence retrieval system in improving clinical decision-making processes in general practice. The specific hypotheses to be tested in this study are that:
1. Online evidence systems are clinically acceptable and will be used by clinicians in ‘real world’ general practice settings
2. Online evidence systems are effective in changing clinical decision-making behaviour and result in measurable improvements in evidence-based prescribing decisions
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedOnline clinical evidence retrieval technology
InterventionParticipants in the intervention group were given access to Quick Clinical an online clinical evidence retrieval system specifically designed around the needs of family physicians. This system is based on the generic use of search filters focused on clinical questions and retrieves evidence from multiple resources including bibliographic databases, textbooks and summarised guidelines.

Participants in the control group received no intervention.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measureThe primary outcome measures are clinician acceptance and use of Quick Clinical and the resulting change in decision-making behaviour. Specific outcome measures are:
1. Physician acceptability focusing on ease of use and usefulness and patterns of use of QC
2. Prescribing patterns in clinical priority areas identified at the start of the study
3. Prescribing patterns in response to new evidence of the effectiveness of new or existing treatments
4. Patterns of non-pharmacological clinical management
Secondary outcome measures1. Referral patterns
2. Management decisions
3. Number, timing and types of investigations
Overall study start date01/05/2005
Completion date01/05/2006

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants200
Key inclusion criteriaRegistered general practitioners who had a computer with Internet connectivity and prescribed electronically were studied.
Key exclusion criteriaClinicians were excluded if they were participating in other studies requiring the provision of prescribing data or if they were planning to retire or move to another practice during the study period.
Date of first enrolment01/05/2005
Date of final enrolment01/05/2006

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Australia

Study participating centre

Centre for Health Informatics
Sydney
2052
Australia

Sponsor information

University of New South Wales (Australia) - Centre for Health Informatics
University/education

Coogee Campus
Sydney
2052
Australia

Website http://www.chi.unsw.edu.au/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03r8z3t63

Funders

Funder type

University/education

University of New South Wales (Australia) - Centre for Health Informatics

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article 24/08/2006 Yes No

Editorial Notes

08/11/2022: Internal review.