Insecticide-treated bednets for control of domestic ticks and prevention of African tick-borne relapsing fever

ISRCTN ISRCTN04521623
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN04521623
Secondary identifying numbers N/A
Submission date
14/04/2009
Registration date
13/05/2009
Last edited
13/05/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Infections and Infestations
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Philip McCall
Scientific

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Pembroke Place
Liverpool
L3 5QA
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleA randomised controlled trial of insecticide-treated bednets for control of domestic ticks and prevention of African tick-borne relapsing fever
Study objectivesWe investigated whether insecticide-treated bednets, using the insecticide formulation and standard practices currently promoted and used widely for malaria prevention in Africa, could control household infestations of soft ticks (Argasids) and prevent transmission of tick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF) to humans.
Ethics approval(s)1. The Medical Research Coordinating Committee (MRCC) of the National Institute for Medical Research (NIMRI) Tanzania gave approval on the 24th May 2001 (ref: NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX /28)
2. The Research Ethics Committee of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine gave approval on the 4th July 2001 (ref: 01.30)

A research permit (03849) was issued by the Tanzanian Committee for Science and Technology (COSTECH), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania on 02/04/2001.
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTick-borne relapsing fever (TBRF)
InterventionThis is a randomised controlled trial performed over 29 months; households are selected by two-stage random sampling and randomised to either receive insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) or no nets (control). Households in both arms were unmatched.

Treated households were provided with insecticide-treated bednets: standard green medium-sized circular bednets (1.5 m x 1.8 m at base, 2.1 m high; total net area of 2.7 sq m), of 75-denier polyester fibre (Tanzania manufacturing Textile Limited factory), impregnated with the pyrethroid lambdacyhalothrin (ICONET; Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland), using NGAO sachets (dosage of 55.6 mg/m^2) locally marketed for malaria control. Nets were retreated by staff at time of distribution and at 6, 18 and 24 months later.

Control households received no treatment.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Insecticide-treated bednets (impregnated with pyrethroid lambdacyhalothrin)
Primary outcome measurePercentages of households infested with O. moubata s.l. (domestic infestations with the soft tick vector of TBRF), numbers of O. moubata s.l. per house (tick-density) and incidence of Borrelia infections in under five year-old children. Surveys were carried out at baseline, with five follow-ups at 3, 7, 15, 18 and 25 months post-intervention.
Secondary outcome measuresUsing a structured questionnaire, studies on knowledge, attitudes, perceptions and behaviours with regard to the efficacy of ITNs in reducing tick infestations and tick-biting and their perceived benefits were conducted in April 2004 (14 months after the trial began) and at the end of the trial (April 2005). In the latter study, behaviours in the control households and the practice of anti-tick activities were additionally investigated in response to perceived anomalies in the data collected in the previous 12 months.
Overall study start date01/01/2003
Completion date30/04/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupOther
SexBoth
Target number of participants1,472 households
Key inclusion criteriaAll members of families living in traditional style constructed ‘tembe’ houses (rectangular with a flat roof of sod or earth supported by poles and walls of mud plastered wicker or sun-dried bricks) were eligible for inclusion.
Key exclusion criteriaFamilies living in households in which floors and walls were plastered with cement and/or roofed with corrugated metal were excluded because it has long been known that they are rarely, if ever, infested with ticks
Date of first enrolment01/01/2003
Date of final enrolment30/04/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • Tanzania
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Liverpool
L3 5QA
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Sir Halley Stewart Trust (UK)
Charity

22 Earith Road
Cambridge
CB24 5LS
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1954 260707
Email email@sirhalleystewart.org.uk
Website http://www.sirhalleystewart.org.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/020w7x032

Funders

Funder type

Charity

Sir Halley Stewart Trust (UK)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 18/10/2003 Yes No