The effect of an ilio-inguinal block in appendectomy on post operative pain and hospital stay
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN05904043 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN05904043 |
| Protocol serial number | N0199192286 |
| Sponsor | Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health |
| Funder | Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust (UK) |
- Submission date
- 28/09/2007
- Registration date
- 28/09/2007
- Last edited
- 06/07/2009
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Dr Simon Middleton
Scientific
Scientific
Deparment of General Surgery
Royal Berkshire Hospital
London Road
Reading
RG1 5AN
United Kingdom
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised prospective trial with patient and ward staff blinded to intervention |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Scientific title | |
| Study objectives | Does the use of local anaesthetic nerve blocks to numb the operation site, once the patient is anaesthetised, reduce port operative pain in patients undergoing appendectomy? This will be compared to infiltration of the skin alone with local anaesthetic. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Signs and Symptoms: Pain |
| Intervention | 1. Group A: local infiltration of skin prior to incision with bupivacaine according to weight. 2. Group B: half the bupivacaine by weight infiltrated into the skin prior to incision. As incision deepened second half of bupivacaine given under direct vision deep to external oblique, lateral to the incision, to create field block. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
1. Post operative pain in recovery: by questionnaire in recovery |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Not provided at time of registration |
| Completion date | 30/06/2007 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Not Specified |
| Sex | Not Specified |
| Target sample size at registration | 90 |
| Key inclusion criteria | All open appendectomies undertaken for acute appendicitis at Royal Berkshire Hospital. At time of analysis different sub groups formed according to operative findings: gangrenous / perforated appendix or normal appendix. |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Laparoscopic appendectomies. 2. Appendix removed at time of planned laparotomy (i.e. not through small incision). These exclusion criteria exist as we wish to judge the effect of local anaesthetic on post operative pain. Where a different size wound is left (laparoscopic or laparotomy) it would be an unfair comparison. Where the initial operation is appendectomy via a lanz incision but an alternative pathology is found or the wound is extended for a laparotomy then the patient will be included in the study until the time of analysis. |
| Date of first enrolment | 07/03/2007 |
| Date of final enrolment | 30/06/2007 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
Deparment of General Surgery
Reading
RG1 5AN
United Kingdom
RG1 5AN
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 01/05/2010 | Yes | No |