The effect of the use of fasica iliaca nerve blockade on patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia and the effect of continuous nerve blockade on post-operative pain and mobility outcomes in patients with hip fractures
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN07083722 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN07083722 |
| Protocol serial number | RGHT000559 |
| Sponsor | Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (UK) |
| Funder | Belfast Health and Social Care Trust (UK) (ref: RGHT 000559) |
- Submission date
- 30/09/2009
- Registration date
- 14/10/2009
- Last edited
- 07/03/2017
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Surgery
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
Department of Anaesthetics & Intensive Care Medicine
Queen's University Belfast
2nd Floor, Mulhouse Building
Grosvenor Road
Belfast
BT12 6BJ
United Kingdom
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised controlled double-blind trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Comparison of fascia iliac compartment block with conventional sedation to facilitate the positioning of patients with fractured neck of femur for spinal anaesthesia and the effect of nerve blockade on post-operative pain and mobility: a randomised double-blind controlled study |
| Study objectives | Part 1: Does the use of single shot fascia iliaca blockade reduce pain on patient positioning for spinal anaesthesia when compared with a standard sedation regime? Part 2: Does the use of post-operative bolus dose fascia iliaca blockade improve pain and mobility outcomes in patients undergoing operative repair of fractured neck of femur? |
| Ethics approval(s) | Health and Social Care Research Ethics Committee (HSC REC 1) (Northern Ireland), 18/04/2008, ref: 08/NIR01/20 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Operative repair of fractured neck of femur |
| Intervention | Part 1: Patients randomised to receive either fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) with 2 mg/kg 1% lignocaine or conventional sedation with 0.2 mg/kg intravenous (iv) ketamine and 0.025 mg/kg iv midazolam. At the end of surgery, a FICB using 1 mg/kg 0.25% levobupivacaine will be performed in all patients. Part 2: Patients randomised to receive a pre-operative FICB using either 1 mg/kg 0.25% levobupivacaine or 2 mg/kg 1% lignocaine. After administration of FICB a catheter will be inserted below the fascia iliaca and secured in place. Patients will be reviewed in the post-operative period and bolus doses of 0.125% levobupivacaine administered through the FICB catheter if Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is greater than 4. The catheter will be removed no longer than 24 hours after surgery. |
| Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Part 1: Comparison of VAS score on rest and positioning for spinal anaesthesia in patients who have received either a fascia iliaca compartment block or convention sedation. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
1. Length of time to first request of additional analgesia |
| Completion date | 01/09/2009 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 100 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I - IV 2. Patients able to give written informed consent 3. Patients requiring operative repair of fractured neck of femur 4. Patients aged 18 years and over, either sex |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. History of dementia or difficulty in obtaining consent 2. History of allergy to any of the medications used in the study |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/07/2009 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/09/2009 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- Northern Ireland
Study participating centre
BT12 6BJ
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Editorial Notes
07/03/2017: No publications found, verifying study status with principal investigator.