Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention in Family Practice: The Better Project

ISRCTN ISRCTN07170460
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN07170460
Protocol serial number 2.0
Sponsor Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Canada)
Funders Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Canada), Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
Submission date
23/03/2010
Registration date
07/04/2010
Last edited
25/01/2017
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Eva Grunfeld
Scientific

500 University Ave.
Suite 352
Toronto
ON M5G 1V7
Canada

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designPragmatic randomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleThe use of patient- and practice-level interventions to improve chronic disease prevention in family practice: A pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Study acronymBETTER
Study objectives1. In a family practice group setting, to determine if a patient-centred prevention and screening intervention by a well-trained health professional, for adults aged 40 to 65, is effective.
2. In a family practice group setting, to determine if a practice-centred intervention is effective.
3. To determine if either the patient-centred or practice-centred interventions are cost-effective.
Ethics approval(s)1. University of Alberta Research Ethics Board, 08/04/2010
2. Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board, 31/05/2010, ref: #10-024
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedChronic disease prevention - specifically cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases
Intervention1. Patient-level intervention with a trained health care professional during which a plan will be developed for the patient. All recommendations and discussions will be based on the 'BETTER' prevention and screening manoeuvers that are evidence-based best practice manoeuvers.
2. Practice-level intervention will involve a trained Practice Facilitator who will develop a plan for the practice that will focus on how to optimise the use of existing information tools and resources.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

The Summary Quality Index (SQUID), measured at 6 months
A reliable and valid composite measure to track quality of care among primary care practice patients that use an electronic medical record (EMR). The primary analysis will be a comparison between the SQUID of the intervention group and the SQUID of the control group.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Assessment of the impact of the intervention in improving the quality of care, comparison made from baseline to 6 months follow-up (intervention group only)
2. Economic evaluation to examine the cost-effectiveness of the interventions
Outcomes will be measured at 12 months.

Completion date01/03/2012

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexAll
Target sample size at registration1120
Key inclusion criteria1. Strata 1:
1.1. Adult patients of the participating Family Physicians who are between the ages of 40 and 65, inclusive
1.2. Written informed consent to participate in the trial
2. Strata 2: Adults with moderate mental illness aged 40 to 65
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients who are unable to give written informed consent for reasons of language, literacy or competence
2. Patients who are not able to come to the family practice office
3. Off-site patients or non-active patients (no visit in the last 3 years) of the family physician
Date of first enrolment01/07/2010
Date of final enrolment01/03/2012

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Canada

Study participating centre

500 University Ave.
Toronto
ON M5G 1V7
Canada

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 22/01/2014 Yes No
Results article results 01/01/2017 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Editorial Notes

25/01/2017: Publication reference added.