The development and preliminary testing of a self-determination centred exercise consultation training program

ISRCTN ISRCTN07682833
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN07682833
Secondary identifying numbers Version 2
Submission date
02/08/2007
Registration date
12/09/2007
Last edited
29/09/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Joan Duda
Scientific

School of Sport and Exercise Sciences
The University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)121 414 2737
Email jld0330@aol.com

Study information

Study designPragmatic cluster randomised control trial of standard exercise on prescription with a self-determination theory-based exercise on prescription
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeQuality of life
Scientific title
Study acronymEMPOWER
Study objectives1. To determine the effect of the present Exercise on Prescription (EoP) scheme operating in Birmingham on participants' self-reported Physical Activity (PA), associated health behaviours, physical health, and well-being/quality of life at three months and a six-month follow-up
2. To develop a Self Determination Theory-based (SDT) training program for Birmingham health and fitness advisors
3. To determine the effect of the SDT-based (EoP) scheme on participants' self-reported Physical Activity (PA) associated health behaviours, physical health, and well-being/quality of life at three months and a six-month follow-up
4. To compare the effect (at three and six months) of an exercise consultation delivered by SDT-trained health and fitness advisors with an exercise consultation provided by currently trained health and fitness advisors in Birmingham on participants' self-reported physical activity, associated health behaviours, physical health, and well-being/quality of life
5. To examine in an exploratory manner, potential differential effects of the EoP scheme where taught by SDT trained versus control health and fitness advisors as a function of the gender/age, ethnicity, and socio-economic status of the participant
Ethics approval(s)University of Birmingham School of Sport and Exercise Sciences Ethics Sub-Committee, 25/07/2007, ref: LE 07/22
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedGeneral population under 65 that are sedentary with risk factors, for example CHD, diabetes, high blood pressure, mild depression.
InterventionThe intervention spans a three month period during which a health and fitness advisor has one-to-one contact in person (at leisure centres) or via telephone with the participant four times. The advisors will be informed of the principles of self-determination theory and trained to employ particular strategies targeting the promotion of self-determined motivation for behavioural change in the participant.

Following the baseline assessment of the primary and secondary outcomes, the initial consultation will comprise a one hour one-to-one person centred interview and, consistent with the EoP scheme, have the option of a fitness appraisal. At this time, participants will also be given a booklet designed to encourage self-management of physical activity initiation. At one month, the next contact (15 - 20 minutes) will be conducted via telephone or face-to-face. The discussion will be reinforcing successful physical activity engagement attempts and providing strategies for enhancing exercise efficacy. At two months, a brief (5 minute) phone call or face-to-face contact by the advisor will be made to offer encouragement regarding attempts to be physically active. At three months, primary and secondary outcomes will be re-assessed and a final face-to-face "booster" consultation (20 - 30 minutes) will take place focused on recognising and reinforcing the internalisation of the participant's physical activity involvement. Again, the option of a fitness appraisal will be made available. A supplemental self-management booklet centred on the monitoring and maintenance of physical activity will also be provided at this time.

Participants in the control group will be provided with the standard EoP program.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureSelf-reported physical activity using the 7-day Physical Activity Recall (PAR), a structured interview that has been extensively validated against objective measures. Both estimated overall energy expenditure and time spent in vigorous and moderate intensity physical activity will be calculated for all participants at three time points (baseline, 3 months and 6 months).
Secondary outcome measures1. Associated health behaviours: smoking, alcohol consumption, fruit/vegetable intake with brief self-report measures
2. Physical health outcomes: Body Mass Index (BMI), Blood Pressure (BP)
3. Health related quality of life using the Dartmouth Co-op Charts
4. Anxiety and depression measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
5. Vitality using the Subjective Vitality Scale (Ryan and Frederick)
6. Intention to increase physical activity, at baseline and three months only
7. Motivation and processes of change: perceptions of autonomy support from the Advisor, perceived efficacy, autonomy, social connectedness with respect to physical activity, and motivational regulations for exercise using validated scales (the Behavioural Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire [BREQ-2], the Health care Climate Questionnaire, Wilson’s Need Questionnaire)

All secondary outcomes measured at baseline, three months and six months (apart from point 6 above, measured at baseline and three months only).
Overall study start date01/09/2007
Completion date31/03/2009

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants500
Key inclusion criteria1. General population under 65 that are sedentary with risk factors, for example Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), diabetes, high blood pressure, mild depression
2. Referred by General Practitioners (GPs) to the Birmingham Exercise on Prescription Scheme
Key exclusion criteria1. Angina pectoris
2. Moderate to high (or unstable) hypertension: 160/102 mmHg or above
3. Poorly controlled insulin-dependant diabetes
4. History of myocardial infarction within the last six months unless the patient has completed Stage III cardiac rehabilitation
5. Established cerebro-vascular disease
6. Severe chronic obstructive airways disease
7. Uncontrolled asthma
Date of first enrolment01/09/2007
Date of final enrolment31/03/2009

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

School of Sport and Exercise Sciences
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

South Birmingham Primary Care Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

c/o Susan Stokes
Assistant Director of Public Health
Moseley Hall Hospital
Alcester Road
Moseley
Birmingham
B13 8JL
England
United Kingdom

Website http://www.southbirminghampct.nhs.uk/

Funders

Funder type

Government

Heart of Birmingham Teaching Primary Care Trust (UK)

No information available

Birmingham East and North Primary Care Trust (UK)

No information available

South Birmingham Primary Care Trust (UK)

No information available

Birmingham City Council (UK)

No information available

Birmingham Health and Wellbeing Partnership (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 08/06/2009 Yes No
Results article results 29/01/2014 Yes No