Development and evaluation of a training intervention for cancer teams talking about randomised trials

ISRCTN ISRCTN08988781
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN08988781
Protocol serial number 4205
Sponsor Brighton and Sussex Medical School (UK)
Funder Cancer Research UK (CRUK) (UK)
Submission date
31/03/2010
Registration date
31/03/2010
Last edited
24/01/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/trials/a-study-looking-at-peoples-attitudes-towards-clinical-trials-and-how-doctors-and-nurses-give-information-about-taking-part-in-a-trial

Contact information

Dr Valerie Jenkins
Scientific

Brighton and Sussex Medical School
University of Sussex, Biology Building
Falmer
Brighton
BN1 9QG
United Kingdom

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised interventional multicentre process of care trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleA multicentre randomised controlled trial to improve communication with patients about clinical trials within cancer teams
Study acronymTeams Talking Trials
Study objectivesThe study is a randomised trial to examine whether the communication with patients about clinical trials can be improved within cancer teams. The aims of the study are to:
1. Examine the attitudes of multidisciplinary team (MDT) members to clinical trials and the influence these have on trial recruitment
2. Examine the attitudes of patients towards clinical trials, and their satisfaction with and comprehension of information received about trials and conduct and evaluate specific training for cancer teams about trial discussions.

Team members who undergo focused training will:
1. Display greater confidence about trial discussions post course
2. Be clearer about the informational roles played by colleagues when discussing trials

Patients seen by teams who undergo training will:
1. Rate clarity of information provided more highly
2. Provide more positive reasons for accepting or declining trial end
Ethics approval(s)South East Wales Research Ethics Committee Panel C on 16/02/2007 (ref: 07/WSEO3/17)
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTopic: National Cancer Research Network; Subtopic: All Cancers/Misc Sites; Disease: All
InterventionThe intervention is a 1.5 training course in communication about randomised clinical trials for cancer teams. Each team will receive the intervention either following 6 or 12 months of data collection.

Follow Up Length: 0 month(s)
Study Entry : Other

Details:
Patients attending clinics and hospitals for treatment or follow up are recruited to survey A. 50 patients for each team will be recruited into the survey A.

The number of patients for survey B will vary according to each team, and the number will be recorded pre- and post-educational intervention.

Each patient completes a survey and is noted on the accrual spreadsheet as registered, although the protocol design is randomised.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Numbers of patients approached about trials, analysed in Jan 2011

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Attitudes and involvement of team members, analysed in June 2010

Completion date30/12/2010

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration1600
Key inclusion criteria1. Cancer teams working in Wales
2. Patients who have had a randomised clinical trial discussed with them by one of the team members
3. Either sex, aged 18 - 90 years
Key exclusion criteriaCancer teams in other parts of the UK
Date of first enrolment04/06/2007
Date of final enrolment30/12/2010

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Brighton
BN1 9QG
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summary
IPD sharing planNot provided at time of registration

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/05/2013 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes
Plain English results 24/01/2022 No Yes

Editorial Notes

24/01/2022: A link to plain English results was added.