Dilute povidone-iodine irrigation versus normal saline irrigation in preventing surgical site infection after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN10376975 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10376975 |
| Sponsor | University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital |
| Funder | University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital |
- Submission date
- 21/03/2026
- Registration date
- 04/04/2026
- Last edited
- 07/05/2026
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Digestive System
Plain English summary of protocol
Plain English summary of protocol not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Principal investigator, Scientific, Public
Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, East-West Road, Alakahia, Port Harcourt
Port Harcourt, Rivers State
500102
Nigeria
| 0009-0002-6833-1220 | |
| Phone | +2348060553917 |
| drdareafolabi2001@yahoo.com |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Allocation | Randomized controlled trial |
| Masking | Blinded (masking used) |
| Control | Active |
| Assignment | Parallel |
| Purpose | Treatment |
| Scientific title | Dilute povidone-iodine irrigation versus normal saline irrigation in preventing surgical site infection after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial |
| Study acronym | POVI-SSI |
| Study objectives | This study aims to compare two commonly used solutions, dilute povidone-iodine and normal saline, for cleaning the surgical wound during appendectomy in patients with perforated appendicitis. Surgical site infection is a common complication after this type of surgery, especially in severe cases. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either povidone-iodine or normal saline irrigation during surgery. The study evaluates which method is more effective in reducing wound infections and improving patient outcomes after surgery. |
| Ethics approval(s) |
Approved 27/02/2017, The Ethics and Research Committee at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH) (East-West Road, Port Harcourt, 500102, Nigeria; -; info@upthng.com), ref: UPTH/ADM/90/S.II/VOL.XI/374 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Perforated appendicitis requiring appendectomy |
| Intervention | Randomisation was performed using a computer-generated random sequence with allocation concealment via sealed opaque envelopes. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group A received dilute povidone-iodine irrigation of the surgical wound before closure, while Group B received normal saline irrigation before wound closure during appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. |
| Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
|
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
|
| Completion date | 31/12/2021 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | |
|---|---|
| Age group | Mixed |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Upper age limit | 100 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 120 |
| Total final enrolment | 120 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. Adult patients (≥18 years) 2. Diagnosed with perforated appendicitis, undergoing emergency appendectomy 3. Provided informed consent |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients with non-perforated appendicitis 2. Those with previous abdominal surgery 3. Patients with significant immunosuppression or severe comorbidities 4. Those who did not provide informed consent |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/12/2019 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2020 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Nigeria
Study participating centres
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol file | 07/05/2026 | No | No |
Additional files
- ISRCTN10376975 Protocol.pdf
- Protocol file
Editorial Notes
07/05/2026: Uploaded protocol (not peer-reviewed) as an additional file.
01/04/2026: Study’s existence confirmed by the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital Ethical Committee and the Research Ethics Group of the Centre for Medical Research and Training College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.