Dilute povidone-iodine irrigation versus normal saline irrigation in preventing surgical site infection after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis

ISRCTN ISRCTN10376975
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10376975
Sponsor University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital
Funder University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital
Submission date
21/03/2026
Registration date
04/04/2026
Last edited
07/05/2026
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Digestive System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Plain English summary of protocol not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Emmanuel Afolabi
Principal investigator, Scientific, Public

Department of Surgery, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, East-West Road, Alakahia, Port Harcourt
Port Harcourt, Rivers State
500102
Nigeria

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0009-0002-6833-1220
Phone +2348060553917
Email drdareafolabi2001@yahoo.com

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationRandomized controlled trial
MaskingBlinded (masking used)
ControlActive
AssignmentParallel
PurposeTreatment
Scientific titleDilute povidone-iodine irrigation versus normal saline irrigation in preventing surgical site infection after appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial
Study acronymPOVI-SSI
Study objectives This study aims to compare two commonly used solutions, dilute povidone-iodine and normal saline, for cleaning the surgical wound during appendectomy in patients with perforated appendicitis. Surgical site infection is a common complication after this type of surgery, especially in severe cases. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either povidone-iodine or normal saline irrigation during surgery. The study evaluates which method is more effective in reducing wound infections and improving patient outcomes after surgery.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 27/02/2017, The Ethics and Research Committee at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH) (East-West Road, Port Harcourt, 500102, Nigeria; -; info@upthng.com), ref: UPTH/ADM/90/S.II/VOL.XI/374

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPerforated appendicitis requiring appendectomy
InterventionRandomisation was performed using a computer-generated random sequence with allocation concealment via sealed opaque envelopes. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Group A received dilute povidone-iodine irrigation of the surgical wound before closure, while Group B received normal saline irrigation before wound closure during appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Surgical site infection within 30 days following appendectomy measured using clinical assessment data, based on standard diagnostic criteria, including the presence of purulent discharge, wound erythema, swelling, tenderness, or wound dehiscence at one timepoint at the end of the trial
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
  1. Length of hospital stay and postoperative complications during the hospital stay and within 30 days postoperatively measured using data recording the number of days from surgery to discharge, and clinical assessment data, based on the occurrence of any adverse events following surgery, at one timepoint at the end of the trial
Completion date31/12/2021

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit100 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration120
Total final enrolment120
Key inclusion criteria1. Adult patients (≥18 years)
2. Diagnosed with perforated appendicitis, undergoing emergency appendectomy
3. Provided informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients with non-perforated appendicitis
2. Those with previous abdominal surgery
3. Patients with significant immunosuppression or severe comorbidities
4. Those who did not provide informed consent
Date of first enrolment01/12/2019
Date of final enrolment31/12/2020

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Nigeria

Study participating centres

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol file 07/05/2026 No No

Additional files

ISRCTN10376975 Protocol.pdf
Protocol file

Editorial Notes

07/05/2026: Uploaded protocol (not peer-reviewed) as an additional file.
01/04/2026: Study’s existence confirmed by the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital Ethical Committee and the Research Ethics Group of the Centre for Medical Research and Training College of Health Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.