Revascularisation or medical therapy in elderly patients with acute anginal syndromes

ISRCTN ISRCTN10487159
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10487159
ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02086019
Secondary identifying numbers 16226
Submission date
13/03/2014
Registration date
13/03/2014
Last edited
13/10/2021
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Circulatory System
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a term referring to various heart conditions, including heart attacks. Despite the enormous amount of research around ACS, there is only a very small amount of data on the management of ACS in the elderly, octogenarian population. About 33% of all ACS episodes in the UK occur in patients aged over 75. The incidence of ACS in the octogenarian is projected to increase due to advances in ACS treatment in an aging population. A non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is a less serious heart attack where the supply of blood to the heart is only partially blocked. Treatment for NSTEMI can be divided into two groups: optimal medical therapy (OMT) or OMT plus revascularisation. OMT consists of the medications heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, beta blocker and a statin followed by a plan to optimise long-term medical treatment in order to reduce future cardiac events. OMT plus revascularisation refers to OMT together with a coronary angiogram (X-ray of the heart) followed by either stent insertion or coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). As yet, no large studies comparing OMT with OMT plus revascularisation have been undertaken in octogenarian patients. The small amount of data that is available appears to demonstrate a greater benefit from revascularisation, yet it is common for this to be denied to them. Our aim is to recruit over 700 patients aged 80 or over to a study comparing OMT with OMT plus revascularisation.

Who can participate?
NSTEMI patients aged 80 or over

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to be treated with either OMT or OMT plus revascularisation.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration

Where is the study run from?
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
April 2014 to September 2019

Who is funding the study?
Medtronic International Trading Sàrl

Who is the main contact?
Mr Duncan Fatz
duncan.fatz@bsuh.nhs.uk

Contact information

Mr Duncan Fatz
Scientific

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
HIV Research Office
Sussex House
Abbey Road
Brighton
BN2 1ES
United Kingdom

Email duncan.fatz@bsuh.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designRandomised; Interventional; Design type: Not specified
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleRevascularisation or medical therapy in elderly patients with acute anginal syndromes
Study acronymRINCAL
Study hypothesisThe aim is to recruit over 700 patients 80 years or over to a randomised controlled trial comparing revascularisation plus OMT (invasive arm) versus optimal medical therapy (conservative arm).
Ethics approval(s)London - Brighton & Sussex Research Ethics Committee, 27/11/2013, ref: 13/LO/1082
ConditionTopic: Cardiovascular; Subtopic: Cardiovascular (all Subtopics); Disease: Atherothrombosis
InterventionPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG)
Intervention typeMixed
Primary outcome measureComposite at 1 year of:
1. Death
2. Non-fatal myocardial infarction
Secondary outcome measuresNot provided at time of registration
Overall study start date01/04/2014
Overall study end date01/09/2019

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupSenior
SexBoth
Target number of participantsPlanned Sample Size: 750; UK Sample Size: 750
Total final enrolment251
Participant inclusion criteria1. Age 80 or over
2. Non STEMI characteristic chest pain accompanied by typical ischaemic ECG changes a troponin rise
3. Suitable for conservative or invasive strategy
Participant exclusion criteria1. Acute STEMI
2. Cardiogenic shock
3. Lack of suitability for whatever clinical reason to be randomised (any condition in the opinion of the Investigator would make it unsafe or unsuitable for the patient to participate in the study)
4. Platelet count =50 x 109/mm3
5. Patient life expectancy < 1 year
6. Known allergies to clopidogrel, aspirin, heparin, stainless steel, IV contrast or stent
7. Drug elutant
8. Recent major GI haemorrhage (within 3 months)
9. Any previous cerebral bleeding episode
10. Participation in another investigational drug or device study
11. Patient unable to give consent
12. Clinical decision precluding the use of stents
Recruitment start date01/04/2014
Recruitment end date01/09/2018

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust
Brighton
BN2 1ES
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Hospital/treatment centre

CIRU, Royal Sussex County Hospital
Eastern Road
Brighton
BN2 5BE
England
United Kingdom

Funders

Funder type

Industry

Medtronic; Grant Codes: UK- SHQ –SBU
Private sector organisation / For-profit companies (industry)
Alternative name(s)
Medtronic Inc.
Location
United States of America

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Dr Adam de Belder (a.debelder@nhs.net).

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 17/05/2021 11/10/2021 Yes No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

13/10/2021: IPD sharing statement added.
11/10/2021: Publication reference and total final enrolment added.
05/08/2019: ClinicalTrials.gov number added.
16/07/2018: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The recruitment end date was changed from 01/04/2018 to 01/09/2018.
2. The overall trial end date was changed from 01/04/2018 to 01/09/2019.
12/02/2016: Plain English summary added.