Can caffeine chewing gum and watching and imagining golf movements improve bunker shots and driving performance after mental fatigue?

ISRCTN ISRCTN10501086
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10501086
Sponsors Hainan Normal University, Macao Polytechnic University
Funder Hainan Normal University
Submission date
11/10/2026
Registration date
13/10/2026
Last edited
12/10/2026
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Other
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Prof Xianfei Wang
Public, Scientific, Principal investigator

3 Xiaoji No.1 Rd, Mei Lan Qu
Haikou
571127
China

Phone +86 18976037604
Email 090206@hainnu.edu.cn
Mr Shiao Zhao
Public, Scientific, Principal investigator

5HV2+CP8, R. de Luís Gonzaga Gomes, Macao
Macau
999078
China

Phone +853 19358564748
Email zhaoshiao530@gmail.com
Dr Guowen Ai
Public, Scientific, Principal investigator

3 Xiaoji No.1 Rd, Mei Lan Qu
Haikou
571127
China

Phone +86 15708918980
Email 920538@hainnu.edu.cn
Prof Ziheng Ning
Public, Scientific, Principal investigator

5HV2+CP8, R. de Luís Gonzaga Gomes
Macau
999078
China

Phone +853 14714947917
Email zhning@mpu.edu.mo

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationRandomized controlled trial
MaskingBlinded (masking used)
ControlPlacebo
AssignmentCrossover
PurposeTreatment, Acute effects of caffeine chewing gum and asynchronous action observation and motor imagery (A-AOMI), administered independently and in combination, on golf bunker-shot accuracy and driver performance following experimentally induced mental fatigue in golfers with basic experience in both skills.
Scientific titleEffects of caffeine chewing gum and asynchronous action observation and motor imagery on golf bunker-shot and driver performance following mental fatigue: a randomised, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, four-period crossover trial
Study objectives
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 21/08/2026, Teaching Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences and Sports, Macao Polytechnic University (5HV2+CP8, R. de Luís Gonzaga Gomes, Macau, 999078, China; +853 8599 6333; tlsiu@mpu.edu.mo), ref: FCSD/DPPESS-006/2026

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAcute mental fatigue and golf-specific motor performance in healthy golfers with basic experience in bunker shots and driver swings. The study investigates the effects of caffeine chewing gum and asynchronous action observation and motor imagery (A-AOMI) on bunker-shot accuracy and driving performance. No diagnosed medical condition is being investigated.
InterventionThis study will employ a randomised, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, four-period crossover design to investigate the acute effects of caffeine chewing gum and asynchronous action observation and motor imagery (A-AOMI) on golf bunker-shot and driver performance following experimentally induced mental fatigue.
Each participant will complete one familiarisation/baseline assessment session and four experimental sessions separated by a planned 7-day washout period. The four experimental conditions will be administered in a balanced randomised sequence.
The four conditions are:
1. CAF + A-AOMI:200 mg caffeine chewing gum combined with task-specific A-AOMI.
2. CAF + CON:200 mg caffeine chewing gum combined with a neutral control task.
3. PLA + A-AOMI:Placebo chewing gum combined with task-specific A-AOMI.
4. PLA + CON:Placebo chewing gum combined with a neutral control task.
During the initial baseline session, participants will complete 12 bunker shots and 10 driver shots following familiarisation and safety screening. At each experimental visit, participants will first complete baseline assessments, including four bunker shots and three driver shots, before undergoing a 30-minute Stroop task to induce mental fatigue.
Following the Stroop task and a standardised seated physiological assessment, participants will chew either caffeine or placebo gum for 10 minutes and then discard it.
The A-AOMI intervention consists of two task-specific segments, each lasting 3.5 minutes. Each segment includes brief technical instructions, first-person action observation, third-person action observation, guided first-person kinaesthetic motor imagery, and preparation for the subsequent performance task. The neutral control tasks will be matched in duration and will not contain golf-specific action observation or motor imagery instructions.
Participants will first complete the 3.5-minute bunker-specific A-AOMI or neutral control task, immediately followed by 12 bunker shots. After a standardised transition involving two to three practice swings without hitting a ball, participants will complete the 3.5-minute driver-specific A-AOMI or neutral control task, immediately followed by 10 driver shots.
Bunker-shot performance will be evaluated using a predefined 0–5-point scoring system for each shot, yielding a maximum total score of 60 points. Driver performance will be assessed using a FlightScope launch monitor, including ball speed, clubhead speed, carry distance, total distance, smash factor, and lateral deviation.
Heart rate and heart rate variability will be recorded during three standardised five-minute seated periods: before the Stroop task, after the Stroop task, and following the performance tests. Subjective mental fatigue, intervention adherence, and adverse events will also be assessed.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Bunker-shot performance (12-shot total zonal score) measured using the total zonal score across 12 standardised bunker shots (range: 0–60 points), at the initial baseline assessment (12 bunker shots) and immediately following the bunker-specific intervention during each of the four experimental sessions (12 bunker shots per session; approximately 7 days between sessions)
  2. Driver ball speed measured using a FlightScope launch monitor to calculate mean ball speed across 10 standardised driver shots, at the initial baseline assessment (10 driver shots) and immediately following the driver-specific intervention during each of the four experimental sessions (10 driver shots per session; approximately 7 days between sessions)
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
  1. Bunker-shot escape success rate measured using the percentage of successful bunker exits across 12 standardised bunker shots, calculated as the number of shots successfully exiting the bunker divided by 12 and multiplied by 100. Higher percentages indicate better performance, at the initial baseline assessment and immediately after the bunker-specific intervention during each of the four experimental sessions (approximately 7 days apart)
  2. Bunker-shot on-green success rate measured using the percentage of bunker shots finishing on the putting green across 12 standardised shots, calculated as the number of shots finishing on the green divided by 12 and multiplied by 100. Higher percentages indicate better performance, at the initial baseline assessment and immediately after the bunker-specific intervention during each of the four experimental sessions (approximately 7 days apart)
  3. Driver clubhead speed measured using a FlightScope launch monitor to calculate the mean clubhead speed across 10 standardised driver shots, at the initial baseline assessment and immediately after the driver-specific intervention during each of the four experimental sessions (approximately 7 days apart)
  4. Driver carry distance measured using a FlightScope launch monitor to calculate the mean carry distance across 10 standardised driver shots, at the initial baseline assessment and immediately after the driver-specific intervention during each of the four experimental sessions (approximately 7 days apart)
  5. Driver total distance measured using a FlightScope launch monitor to calculate the mean total distance across 10 standardised driver shots, at the initial baseline assessment and immediately after the driver-specific intervention during each of the four experimental sessions (approximately 7 days apart)
  6. Driver smash factor measured using FlightScope launch monitor to calculate the mean smash factor across 10 standardised driver shots, at the initial baseline assessment and immediately after the driver-specific intervention during each of the four experimental sessions (approximately 7 days apart)
  7. Driver directional accuracy measured using mean absolute lateral deviation across valid driver shots, calculated from the absolute values of signed left/right lateral deviations recorded by FlightScope, at the initial baseline assessment and immediately after the driver-specific intervention during each of the four experimental sessions (approximately 7 days apart)
  8. Subjective mental fatigue measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), at pre and immediately post the 30-minute Stroop task, following each task-specific A-AOMI or control segment, and after completion of the golf performance tests during each of the four experimental sessions
  9. Heart rate variability (HRV) measured using Polar H10 heart rate sensor data to calculate of the natural logarithm of the root mean square of successive differences between normal-to-normal heartbeats (lnRMSSD), at three timepoints during each experimental session: T0 (before the Stroop task), T2 (after the Stroop task and before caffeine/placebo administration), and T6 (after completion of bunker-shot and driver performance tests).
Completion date26/11/2026

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit25 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration16
Key inclusion criteria1. Healthy adults aged 18–25 years
2. Golfers with basic experience in both bunker shots and driver swings, including previous bunker-shot instruction or practical experience
3. Able to safely perform standardised bunker shots and driver swings, as confirmed during the familiarisation and screening session
4. Normal or corrected-to-normal vision and the ability to distinguish the colours used in the Stroop task
5. Able to understand and follow the experimental procedures, including the mental fatigue task, chewing gum intervention, and action observation and motor imagery instructions
6. Willing and able to attend one familiarisation/baseline session and four experimental sessions, with a planned 7-day washout period between consecutive experimental sessions
7. Able to comply with the pre-test restrictions, including abstaining from caffeine and alcohol for 24 hours before each experimental session
8. Willing to provide written informed consent before participation
Key exclusion criteria1. Insufficient experience or technical ability to safely perform standardised bunker shots or driver swings
2. History of cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias, epilepsy, or other medical conditions that may increase the risks associated with caffeine intake or physical activity
3. Known hypersensitivity, allergy, or intolerance to caffeine or any ingredient in the experimental chewing gum
4. Current use of medications that may interact with caffeine or substantially affect central nervous system activity, heart rate, or exercise responses
5. Musculoskeletal injuries or physical limitations that prevent safe performance of bunker shots or driver swings
6. Neurological or visual impairments that substantially interfere with performing the Stroop task or following action observation and motor imagery instructions
7. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
8. Oral or temporomandibular conditions that prevent safe chewing of gum
9. Inability or unwillingness to comply with the experimental schedule, washout periods, or pre-test restrictions
10. Participation in another intervention study that could interfere with the outcomes of the present trial
Date of first enrolment20/10/2026
Date of final enrolment25/10/2026

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • China

Study participating centres

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo

Editorial Notes

12/10/2026: Study’s existence confirmed by the Teaching Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences and Sports, Macao Polytechnic University, China.