Comparison of patient-device interface types in breathing support of newly born infants

ISRCTN ISRCTN10561691
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10561691
Secondary identifying numbers 10/2021/10919
Submission date
28/05/2021
Registration date
01/06/2021
Last edited
09/02/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the most commonly used device for supporting the breathing of babies. However, providing effective CPAP in preterm infants have been challenging, often related to problems associated with the nasal interface. Most neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) use short nasal prongs to deliver supplemental oxygen and CPAP in neonates. These prongs are effective and safe but have the potential to cause nasal septal pressure injury and pressure leak around the nares. The RAM cannula (a canula that connects the device to the baby nose) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for providing supplemental oxygen. It was soon adopted by clinicians to provide CPAP, largely because of its perceived ease of use and less nasal (septal) injury. Compared with the standard nasal interface for CPAP, the RAM cannula is made of softer material with a thin prong wall resulting in a larger caliber and less nasal trauma. However, there is increasing concern that the RAM cannula might be less effective in supporting the breathing of babies.
This study will compare how effective and safe these two devices are.

Who can participate
This study will include babies born at our center

What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly allocated to receive RAM canula or nasal prongs. Participants will be closely monitored until the end of their hospital stay.

What are the possible risks and benefits?
Since both devices are used in our unit , there is no extra risks involved , however if our trial showed that one of these device is better, we will use only that device for our babies.

Where is the study run from?
Jordan University Hospital (Jordan)

When is the study starting and how long is expected to run for?


Who is funding the study?
Investigator initiated and funded

Who are the main contact?
Prof. Manar Al-lawama, manar-76@hotmail.com

Contact information

Prof Manar Al-lawama
Scientific

Ahmad Ahajjaj street
Amman
11937
Jordan

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-9313-112X
Phone +962 799068565
Email m.allawama@ju.edu.jo

Study information

Study designSingle center interventional randomized conrolled study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet No participant information sheet available
Scientific titleRAM canula versus short nasal prongs for management of respiratory distress in neonatal patients: a randomized trial
Study acronymProRAM Study
Study objectivesThe use of RAM canula as an interface in neonates with respiratory distress is as effective as nasal prongs in providing nasal CPAP, easier for the nursing care, and causes less physical injury for the nose of the newborn infant
Ethics approval(s)Approved 18/05/2021, Ethical Committee at The University of Jordan Hospital (Jordan University Hospital, Queen Rania street, PO. Box: 11943, Amman-Jordan; +962 65353666; juhwebsite@ju.edu.jo), ref: 10/2021/10919
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedManegment of neonates with respiratory dsitress
InterventionThe included neonates will be classified into 2 groups, less than 32 weeks GA, and equal to 32 or more GA.
Within each group, the babies will be randomly allocated to be put on RAM canula or nasal prongs.
The demographic data of the included neonates will be collected.
Clinical data will include: presentation, final diagnosis, and respiratory management needed. Chest x-ray findings, blood gas results. Complications, other neonatal morbidities including intraventricular hemorrhage length of stay, and mortality.
Intervention typeDevice
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)RAM canula, short nasal prongs
Primary outcome measureMeasured using data from the patients' charts and laboratory database at discharge:
1. Duration on CPAP
2. Need for escalation of respiratory support
3. Surfactant administration
4. Mortality before discharge
Secondary outcome measuresMeasured using data from the patients' charts and laboratory database at discharge:
1. Nasal injury during respiratory support
2. Pneumothorax during respiratory support
3. Length of hospital stay
4. Chronic Lung disease at 36 weeks Post conceptional age
Overall study start date11/01/2021
Completion date30/09/2021

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNeonate
SexBoth
Target number of participants80
Key inclusion criteriaNeonates who have respiratory dsitress at birth
Key exclusion criteria1. Noenataes who present with respiratory distress after being transferred out of the delivery room
2. Outborns
3. Neonates diagnosed prenatally to have lung malformation
4. Neonates who are diagnosed prenatally or found at birth to have major congenital anomalies
Date of first enrolment06/06/2021
Date of final enrolment30/08/2021

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Jordan

Study participating centre

Jordan University Hospital
Queen Rania Street
Amman
11943
Jordan

Sponsor information

University of Jordan
University/education

Queen Rania Street
Amman
11942
Jordan

Phone +962 6 5355000
Email Admin@ju.edu.jo
Website http://ju.edu.jo/home.aspx
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/05k89ew48

Funders

Funder type

Other

Investigator initiated and funded

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/05/2022
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planThe current data sharing plans for this study are unknown and will be available at a later date.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article 10/01/2024 09/02/2024 Yes No

Editorial Notes

09/02/2024: Publication reference added.
01/06/2021: Trial's existence confirmed by Jordan University Hospital.