Study of the impact of one day versus three days of diet on bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy
ISRCTN | ISRCTN10567113 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN10567113 |
- Submission date
- 28/11/2021
- Registration date
- 08/12/2021
- Last edited
- 18/10/2022
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Digestive System
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Colonoscopy represents the gold standard of screening programs for the early detection of lesions that could develop into cancerous or benign (non-cancerous) tumors. The quality of bowel preparation is reported to significantly affect two important performance measures for colonoscopy, the adenoma detection rate (a type of benign tumour that develops in glandular cells) and the cecal intubation rate (reaching the caecum, and so completing the examination of the entire colon). A one-day low residual (low-fibre) diet is recommended before colonoscopy. This study aims to compare the impact of following a low residual diet for 3 days versus 1 day on the quality of the bowel preparation and the satisfaction and adherence of outpatients undergoing colonoscopy.
Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 years and older who are scheduled to have a colonoscopy with bowel preparation.
What does the study involve?
Eligible patients will be allocated to one of two groups, with an equal chance of being in either group (like tossing a coin). Based on the group to which they were assigned, participants will be informed about the type of diet to follow. Participants in the first group will be asked to follow a 1-day structured low-residue diet (LRD) for 1 day prior to their colonoscopy and those in the other group will be asked to follow a structured LRD for 3 days prior to their colonoscopy. Allowed foods in the LRD will be pasta or rice (not whole), meat, fish, milk, eggs, cheese, ham, and cold cuts, bread (not brown or rye bread), and potatoes. Forbidden foods in the LRD will be vegetables, legumes, and fruits.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The benefit of this study is receiving an excellent bowel cleansing that is necessary to improve the adenoma detection rate and diagnosis. There are no risks for participants other than those related to colonoscopy.
Where is the study run from?
Società Italiana Endoscopia Digestiva (Italy)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
November 2013 to March 2021
Who is funding the study?
Società Italiana Endoscopia Digestiva (Italy)
Who is the main contact?
Prof. Paola Iovino
piovino@unisa.it
Contact information
Scientific
Via Salvador Allende, 43
Baronissi
84081
Italy
0000-0002-9568-0680 | |
Phone | +39 (0)333 386 4917 |
piovino@unisa.it |
Study information
Study design | Multicenter parallel randomized controlled single-blinded trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a patient information sheet |
Scientific title | One-day versus three-days low residue diet and bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial |
Study objectives | To compare the impact of a 3-days versus 1-day low residual diet on the quality of the bowel preparation and the satisfaction and adherence of outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. |
Ethics approval(s) | Approved 03/02/2014, Ethics Committee of the G. Rummo Hospital of Benevento (Segreteria T.S.A., Via Marconi n. 66 – 80059 Torre del Greco, Italy; +39 (0)81/3174206; cometicocampaniasud@aslnapoli3sud.it), ref: n.135 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Bowel preparation quality before colonoscopy |
Intervention | The study informed consent was collected and demographics and medical history recorded on the data collection form. Eligible patients were randomized to one of the following two groups: 1-day structured low-residue diet (LRD) or 3-days structured LRD. Based on the group to which they were assigned, patients were informed both orally and by means of leaflets about the type of diet to be performed. Specifically, the differences between the two arms consisted of the duration of the LRD. Allowed foods were: pasta or rice (not whole), meat, fish, milk, eggs, cheese, ham and cold cuts, bread (not brown or rye bread), potatoes. Forbidden foods were: vegetables, legumes, fruits. All patients received the information sheet for participation in the study and the assessment of the standardized questionnaire of satisfaction for colonoscopy preparation. Demographic data, comorbidities, drug therapy, surgical history, number of evacuations per week, indications for colonoscopy, type of bowel preparation, mode of dose intake, amount of bowel preparation taken, time in hours between the end of preparation and start of colonoscopy, type of sedation, and endoscopic diagnosis were collected. |
Intervention type | Behavioural |
Primary outcome measure | The proportion of subjects with a satisfactory degree of bowel cleanliness with a Score 2 and 3 on the Boston scale in each segment on the day of colonoscopy |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Patient satisfaction measured using a standardized questionnaire of satisfaction for colonoscopy preparation on the day of colonoscopy 2. Adherence to the prescribed diet. measured using patient interview on the day of colonoscopy |
Overall study start date | 04/11/2013 |
Completion date | 01/03/2021 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 421 |
Total final enrolment | 289 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Aged ≥18 years 2. Scheduled to have a colonoscopy with bowel preparation |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Aged <18 years 2. Have undergone a previous proctocolectomy 3. Undergoing a colonoscopy without bowel preparation or in whom the preparation was contraindicated 4. Dietary regimen to be adopted before preparation was contraindicated 5. Refused to provide informed consent 6. Unable to understand the instructions and explanations relating to the purpose and design of the study |
Date of first enrolment | 01/09/2015 |
Date of final enrolment | 30/03/2016 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Italy
Study participating centres
Via Pacevecchia, 53
Benevento
82100
Italy
Via San Leonardo, 1
Salerno
84131
Italy
Via Montedoro, 53
Torre del Greco
80059
Italy
Sponsor information
Research organisation
Via Napoleone Colajanni, 4
Roma
00191
Italy
Phone | +39 (0)636309599 |
---|---|
sied@scstudiocongressi.it | |
Website | http://www.sied.it/ |
Funders
Funder type
Research organisation
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 30/12/2021 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal |
IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Paola Iovino (piovino@unisa.it). The data will be available for about 1 year in the form of an SPSS database and will involve all the data collected during the study and the statistical analysis carried out. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol file | 18/10/2022 | No | No |
Additional files
Editorial Notes
18/10/2022: Uploaded protocol (not peer-reviewed) as an additional file.
02/12/2021: Trial’s existence confirmed by Ethics Committee of the G. Rummo Hospital of Benevento.