Making it Happen: reducing maternal and neonatal deaths in South Africa; healthcare facility level assessment of in-service training in emergency obstetric and early newborn care for staff working in maternity services in twelve districts in RSA
ISRCTN | ISRCTN11224105 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN11224105 |
Secondary identifying numbers | N/A |
- Submission date
- 26/08/2016
- Registration date
- 08/09/2016
- Last edited
- 27/01/2020
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Pregnancy and Childbirth
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Globally, every year 303,000 women die due to pregnancy-related complications, 2.6 million babies are stillborn and a further 2.7 million die in the first month of life. Many of these deaths occur in low and middle income countries and the majority of them are preventable. Poor emergency care is one of the major contributors to the unacceptably high death rates for mothers and newborns in South Africa. Improving emergency care is known to reduce death rates. It is critical for healthcare providers to have up-to-date knowledge and skills. Short training programs are a recognised means of improving the quality of care for patients. This study aims to improve the knowledge and skills of healthcare workers in maternity services in South Africa through two packages: Essential Steps in Managing Obstetric Emergencies (ESMOE) and Emergency Obstetric Simulation Training (EOST).
Who can participate?
Staff from healthcare facilities providing emergency obstetric and newborn care in 12 districts in the Republic of South Africa
What does the study involve?
Healthcare providers at all facilities regularly have the EOST ‘fire-drill’ exercises (short, hands-on, participatory, on the job training) as a means of boosting their knowledge and skills. Additionally, all healthcare providers receive a one-off training using the ESMOE package (2- or 3-day training with a mix of teaching methods using theoretical and practical sessions). This training is introduced at different times to measure the effect of introducing the additional training and to find out how it affects patients and whether it reduces the number of deaths.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Staff taking part in the training benefit from refresher training which increases their ability to provide care to mothers and babies. There are no risks of taking part in the study.
Where is the study run from?
133 facilities in the selected districts in South Africa; all work is coordinated through the MRC departments at the University of Pretoria and the Centre for Maternal and Newborn Care at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine in the UK.
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2011 to January 2018
Who is funding the study?
Department for International Development (DFID) UK and DFID South Africa
Who is the main contact?
Prof. Nynke van den Broek
Contact information
Scientific
Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Pembroke Place
Liverpool
L3 5QA
United Kingdom
0000-0001-8523-2684 |
Study information
Study design | Multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-controlled interventional study |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Other |
Participant information sheet | No participant information sheet available |
Scientific title | Making it Happen: reducing maternal and neonatal deaths in South Africa; healthcare facility level assessment of in-service training in emergency obstetric and early newborn care for staff working in maternity services in twelve districts in RSA |
Study objectives | This study aims to identify the most effective method of providing in-service training in emergency obstetric and newborn care to help to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality in South Africa. With two approaches applied in the study, the null hypothesis is that in-service training in emergency obstetric and early newborn care delivered under Essential Steps in Managing Obstetric Emergencies (ESMOE) package is no different in terms of its effectiveness in reducing maternal and newborn mortality from delivering Emergency Obstetric Simulation Training (EOST) training in healthcare facilities. |
Ethics approval(s) | 1. Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, 30/05/2012, ref: 89/2012 2. Study granted an ethics review exemption by the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine Research and Ethics Committee, 13/05/2016 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | In-service training in emergency obstetric and early newborn care |
Intervention | Two types of training approaches to be used to build capacity of healthcare providers in maternity services to provide emergency obstetric and early newborn care in twelve districts in the Republic of South Africa: 1. Emergency Obstetric Simulation Training (EOST) package: Training of trainers on ESMOE provided for lead doctor and midwife per participating facility. Having completed the training, those healthcare providers to act subsequently as facilitators of EOST in their workplaces by organising regular ‘fire-drill’ sessions on selected aspects of emergency obstetric and newborn care for staff present in the ward during the time of the session. 2. Essential Steps in Managing Obstetric Emergencies (ESMOE) package: Training to be delivered in two forms: 2-day training for lower level cadres and 3-day for medical officers and above, with materials adjusted to meet the needs of specific types of participants. This training is to be delivered once per study period to staff in facilities designated to provide emergency care to mothers and babies in the selected twelve districts. Both interventions to be delivered at all participating facilities; training of trainers to deliver EOST to be done at the start of the trial in all sites (and subsequently rolled out repeatedly to staff over the duration of the trial); ESMOE training delivered at different time points in the twelve districts based on the randomisation of districts (in line with stepped wedge design). All facilities within a district are to be trained a time period of ca. 6-8 weeks. Sufficient number of trainings on ESMOE to be provided to ensure a minimum of 80% of staff within a district have been trained (saturation approach) to ensure a critical mass of staff are trained. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | All outcomes are to be measured monthly in each facility (according to the stepped wedge design) over the study period (26 months): 1. Facility-level stillbirth rate (number of stillbirths per 1000 births) 2. Facility-level maternal case fatality rate for direct obstetric complications (number of maternal deaths due to direct obstetric complications per 100 cases of direct emergency obstetric complications) 3. Facility-level early newborn death rate (number of early newborn deaths per 1000 live births) 4. Facility-level maternal mortality ratio (number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births) |
Secondary outcome measures | Number of women seeking care in healthcare facilities measured in each facility each month (according to the stepped wedge design) over the course of the study period (26 months) |
Overall study start date | 30/09/2011 |
Completion date | 31/01/2018 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Health professional |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | In total, est. 3000 healthcare providers working in maternity services in the 12 districts to be trained in ESMOE; for the purpose of the facility level assessment, all staff at 133 healthcare facilities included in the study to be trained through both EOST and ESMOE training approaches |
Key inclusion criteria | Note: Assessment of intervention done at healthcare facility level 1. Districts for the intervention were identified by the National Department of Heath because of poor health outcomes measured by institutional maternal mortality ration and district level stillbirth rate (within RSA). This is an externally-driven selection and is not representative of all regions in the Republic of South Africa. The final number of eligible districts is 12 2. Within the identified districts, all healthcare facilities designated to provide emergency obstetric and newborn care services as basic (BEmOC) and comprehensive (CEmOC) level in the districts to be included in the study (staff invited for training). The total number of such facilities identified is 136 3. Ultimate inclusion in the study based on ability to provide necessary data for monitoring the results of the intervention. The total number of such facilities is 133. (Other facilities meeting the first two criteria are eligible for inclusion in the training but not the measurement of effectiveness) |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Facilities in non-selected districts 2. Facilities not designated to provide emergency obstetric and newborn care services as basic (BEmOC) or comprehensive (CEmOC) level 3. Facilities unable to provide data for assessing results of the intervention (this is only a criterion for inclusion in the facility-based assessment and does not exclude staff in those facilities being included in training) |
Date of first enrolment | 01/07/2012 |
Date of final enrolment | 31/03/2015 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- South Africa
- United Kingdom
Study participating centres
L3 5QA
United Kingdom
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
-
South Africa
Sponsor information
University/education
Pembroke Place
Liverpool
L3 5QA
England
United Kingdom
Website | http://www.lstmed.ac.uk |
---|---|
https://ror.org/03svjbs84 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- Department for International Development, UK, DFID
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 01/03/2019 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication in a high-impact peer reviewed journal. |
IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Dr Barbara Madaj (Barbara.Madaj@lstmed.ac.uk) or via the Centre’s email address (cmnh@lstmed.ac.uk). Data will be accessible once the trial publication is published. The data dictionary with information on data available (variables and characteristics of variables) can be reviewed by interested parties. Use of data would need to be agreed in advance, following legal and ethical guidelines. Data in this trial relate to health facilities, not individual people, but the information on healthcare facilities will be suitably anonymised to protect the individual facilities. LSTM require data to be preserved for a minimum of five years, but there is no cap for how long the data would be stored. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Results article | results | 10/11/2019 | 27/01/2020 | Yes | No |
Editorial Notes
27/01/2020: Publication reference added.
12/12/2018: The intention to publish date was changed from 01/06/2018 to 01/03/2019.
31/07/2017: Publication and dissemination plan and IPD sharing statement added.
20/07/2017: The overall trial end date was changed from 31/07/2016 to 31/01/2018.