Comparing two ways of cleaning root canals to see which better reduces harmful bacteria during dental treatment

ISRCTN ISRCTN11332195
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN11332195
Sponsor Mustansiriyah University
Funder Investigator initiated and funded
Submission date
21/11/2025
Registration date
25/11/2025
Last edited
25/11/2025
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Oral Health
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of multi-step versus single-step root canal irrigation protocols in reducing bacterial DNA and RNA levels.

Who can participate?
Eligible participants are patients requiring root canal treatment who meet inclusion criteria and provide informed consent.

What does the study involve?
Participants will receive root canal treatment using one of two irrigation methods. Bacterial samples will be collected before and after treatment to assess bacterial load reduction.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may benefit from optimized root canal treatment techniques. Risks include mild discomfort or sensitivity related to standard dental procedures.

Where is the study run from?
The study is conducted at the College of Dentistry, Mustansiriyah University (Iraq)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study starts 08/05/2024, last enrolment 10/04/2025 and completed 18/12/2025 .

Who is funding the study?
Investigator initiated and funded

Who is the main contact?
The main contact is Omar Talib Khaleefah, reachable at omr_ta@yahoo.com for any study-related questions.

Contact information

Dr Omar Khaleefah
Public, Scientific, Principal investigator

Ramadi, Anbar Governorate
Ramadi
31001
Iraq

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-8192-2933
Phone +9647816788826
Email omr_ta@yahoo.com

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designParallel superiority, double-blind randomized controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific titleComparative evaluation of multi-step versus single-step root canal irrigation protocols on reduction of bacterial DNA and RNA levels: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Study objectivesTo compare the efficacy of conventional multi-step irrigants (sodium hypochlorite and EDTA) against single-step Triton irrigants in reducing bacterial DNA and RNA levels within root canals.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 01/05/2024, College of Dentistry Research Ethics Committee (Mustansiriyah University, Baghdad, -, Iraq; -; mucodrec@gmail.com), ref: REC198

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedMaxillary central incisors with necrotic pulp (non-responsive to sensitivity testing), asymptomatic apical periodontitis
InterventionProcedure and Bacterial Sampling:
28 patients included, All teeth follow strict aseptic measures, including plaque removal and disinfection with 30% H2O2 followed by 2.5% NaOCl, which is then inactivated with 5% sodium thiosulfate. Control samples using sterile paper points verify the sterility of the disinfected tooth surface before anesthesia and isolation. After access cavity preparation and complete removal of caries and restoration, the cavity undergoes the same disinfection protocol, and another control sample is obtained.

Patients are randomly assigned to two groups based on irrigation technique:

Group 1: Multi-Step (NaOCl/EDTA, n=14)

Group 2: Single-Step (Triton, n=14)

Before the first sampling (S1), a K-file #15 confirms working length using radiographs and an apex locator. Three sterile paper points are consecutively introduced to full canal length and retained for 60 seconds. Chemomechanical preparation follows using modified NiTi instruments, with irrigation according to group assignment and irrigants neutralized by 5% sodium thiosulfate.

The second sampling (S2) is conducted immediately after chemomechanical preparation using the same sampling method. All samples are collected for bacterial DNA and RNA analysis.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Bacterial DNA levels measured using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis at baseline (before chemomechanical preparation) and immediately after chemomechanical preparation
  2. Bacterial RNA levels measured using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis at baseline (before chemomechanical preparation) and immediately after chemomechanical preparation
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
Completion date18/12/2025

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit60 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration28
Total final enrolment28
Key inclusion criteria1. Maxillary central incisors with necrotic pulp (non-responsive to sensitivity testing)
2. Asymptomatic apical periodontitis, confirmed by periapical radiographs
3. Patients aged 18–60 years
Key exclusion criteria1. Symptomatic teeth (pain, tenderness, swelling)
2. Immature roots
3. Antibiotic use within 3 months
4. Systemic disease
5. Inability to isolate with a rubber dam
6. Periodontal pockets >3 mm
7. Root fractures
8. Severe decay
Date of first enrolment08/05/2024
Date of final enrolment10/04/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Iraq

Study participating centre

outpatient Postgraduate Clinic, College of Dentistry, Mustansiriyah University
Baghdad
10052
Iraq

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study will be available upon request from Omar Talib Khaleefah (omr_ta@yahoo.com)

Editorial Notes

24/11/2025: Trial's existence confirmed by College of Dentistry Research Ethics Committee.