Digital follow-up. Can well-regulated patients with type 2 diabetes have digital annual follow-up without compromising quality of care?
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN11499301 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN11499301 |
| Sponsor | Steno Diabetes Centers |
| Funder | Steno Diabetes Center Aarhus |
- Submission date
- 09/07/2026
- Registration date
- 10/07/2026
- Last edited
- 09/07/2026
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Mrs Kirsten Christensen
Scientific, Public
Scientific, Public
Palle Juel-Jensens Boulevard 11, indgang A
Aarhus
8200
Denmark
| 0009-0000-0726-0575 | |
| Phone | +45 24600481 |
| kichis@rm.dk |
Prof Annelli Sandbæk
Principal investigator
Principal investigator
Palle Juel-Jensens Boulevard 11, indgang A
Aarhus
8200
Denmark
| 0000-0003-1647-2646 | |
| Phone | +45 2128 2073 |
| anesnd@rm.dk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Allocation | Non-randomized controlled trial |
| Masking | Open (masking not used) |
| Control | Active |
| Assignment | Single |
| Purpose | Screening |
| Scientific title | Can well-regulated patients with type 2 diabetes followed by their general practitioner be offered digital follow-up without compromising quality of care? |
| Study objectives | The study will investigate whether digital annual follow-up can be implemented for patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes (as defined by predefined indicators) without compromising treatment quality. Furthermore the study is purposed to gain knowledge on how general practice can safely differentiate care for people with type 2 diabetes with the aim of increasing health equity. In addition, the study contributes knowledge on how digital care can support differentiation in general practice. In this study, every second annual diabetes follow-up, is conducted remotely via email communication between the healthcare provider and the participant over a two-year intervention period. The primary outcome is HbA1c. It is hypothesized to have non-inferiority with respect to changes in HbA1c for the participant in the intervention group compared to a matched control group receiving standard annual follow-up. Secondary outcomes are other diabetes-related clinical indicators (e.g., LDL, eGFR), morbidity and primary and secondary healthcare utilization, where the analysis compares the change in these indicators between the intervention group and the matched control group. |
| Ethics approval(s) |
Approved 25/06/2026, The Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics (Skottenborg 26, Viborg, 8800, Denmark; +45 78410186; komite@rm.dk), ref: Sagsnr. 1-10-72-56-26 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Type 2 diabetes (ICD-10: E11) and follow-up in general practice. |
| Intervention | The intervention consists of replacing annual in-person follow-up with a digital annual follow-up every second year. In this setting, digital annual follow-up means that communication between healthcare provider and the participant is conducted remotely via email. Blood glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) is measured using HbA1c blood samples gained from the participants medical record. HbA1c must be sent to and analyzed at the local Department of Clinical Biochemistry. Analyses will follow the department’s standardized and accredited procedures. Point-of-care HbA1c measurements conducted in the GP clinic are not acceptable. |
| Intervention type | Behavioural |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
|
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
|
| Completion date | 30/11/2028 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | |
|---|---|
| Age group | Mixed |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Upper age limit | 100 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 600 |
| Key inclusion criteria | 1. eGFR >59 mL/min/1.73 m² 2. HbA1c: 2.1. <48 mmol/mol, or 2.2. 48–53 mmol/mol if the individual HbA1c treatment target is <53 mmol/mol 3. Urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR): 3.1. <30 mg/g, or 3.2. 30–300 mg/g with ongoing treatment with organ-protective medication: SGLT-2i or GLP1 agonist and RAS-blockade with ACE-I or ARB (ATC-code: C09, A10BK, A10BD, A10BJ) 4. LDL <2.6 mmol/L 5. Ability to use the Danish national healthcare website (www.sundhed.dk) 6. Ability to read and understand Danish |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. The following diagnosis, ICD-10 codes: 1.1. F00–F03: Dementia – all forms 1.2. F70-F79: Intellectual disability 1.3. I50: Heart failure 1.4. Z51.5: Palliative care. 1.5. Pregnancy (ICD-10 O00-O99) 2. Any diagnoses or circumstances, that by the GPs judgement, makes digital annual follow-up inadvisable or unsafe |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/09/2026 |
| Date of final enrolment | 30/11/2026 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Denmark
Study participating centres
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study will be available upon request to Kirsten Christensen, kichis@rm.dk. |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protocol file | version 4 | 25/06/2026 | 09/07/2026 | No | No |
Additional files
- 49877_Protocol_V4_25June2026.pdf
- Protocol file
Editorial Notes
09/07/2026: Study’s existence confirmed by the Scientific Ethics Committees for the Central Denmark Region, Committee II.