Exploring the implementation of new autistic-led standards in residential and supported living for autistic adults

ISRCTN ISRCTN12256307
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12256307
Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) 336051
Sponsor University of Sussex
Funder National Institute for Health and Care Research
Submission date
06/03/2026
Registration date
06/03/2026
Last edited
06/03/2026
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Care and support are not good enough for autistic adults. Many autistic people are stuck in hospitals when they don’t need to be there. This can happen when care services, like care homes and supported living services, do not support autistic adults well. The Independent Guide to Quality Care for Autistic People (the guide) suggests a better way to support autistic people. The guide was written in 2019 by the National Autistic Taskforce (NAT). The NAT is run by autistic people. The NAT want to help speak up for other autistic people when it is hard for them to speak up for themselves, especially autistic people with a learning disability.

The guide says that staff in care services should respect autistic people’s rights. Autistic people living in care services should have more control over their lives and how they are supported. Staff should listen to autistic people and think about how they feel not about behaviours.

This project will try out the ideas in the Guide, in care services. Autistic people from the NAT, and researchers who know about autism and care services, will work with autistic people living in care services and staff. The project will happen in two different care services.

The project will take two years. We will:

- find things which are not working well
- work out how to fix problems
- try those new ways of working, to see if they work better

We will do these steps 3 or 4 times, to try to make different things better. We will use the ideas in the Guide to help us see things that are not working well for autistic people. We will watch and listen to autistic people living in care services to find out what they think. We will talk to staff to find out what they think could be better. We will have meetings with some of the staff and autistic people who live in care services every month. In the meetings we will
talk about what works well and what doesn’t work well. We will measure how things are changing by visiting the care services, listening to autistic people who live in the care services, families and staff, and looking at what staff have written down.

A different group called the ‘advisory panel’ will meet 4 times per year. The advisory panel will include autistic people; family members; staff; managers and people who decide which care services autistic people are supported by. The researchers will tell the panel what is happening in the project. The advisory panel will tell the researchers what they think.

The project will make new tools to help care services provide better care for autistic people.

Contact information

Dr David Orr
Scientific, Principal investigator

Department of Social Work and Social Care, University of Sussex
Brighton
BN1 9QQ
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-2107-2671
Phone +44 1273 678167
Email d.orr@sussex.ac.uk
Prof Sue Fletcher-Watson
Public

Centre for Biomedicine, Self and Society
Usher Building
University of Edinburgh
5, Little France Road
Edinburgh
EH16 4UX
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-2688-1734
Phone +44 131 651 3083
Email sue.fletcher-watson@ed.ac.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationN/A: single arm study
MaskingOpen (masking not used)
ControlUncontrolled
AssignmentSingle
PurposeSupportive care
Scientific titleDeveloping and applying new autistic-led standards for social care environments: a participatory action research study of Ethical Quality Autistic Led Support
Study acronymEQUALS
Study objectives
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 19/02/2026, London - Camberwell St Giles Research Ethics Committee (2 Redman Place, Stratford, London, E20 1JQ, United Kingdom; +44 20 7104 8000; camberwellstgiles.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 26/LO/0037

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedAutism
InterventionThree participatory action groups are expected to run on a monthly basis, and culminate in whole-service reflection. These action groups are designed to implement the National Autistic Taskforce service standards recommendations for autistic people, contributing to culture change within services.
As a participatory action project, the process is a focus of learning from the study alongside the outcomes.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Feasibility and acceptability of implementing the EQUALS approach measured using survey results and service records at 0-12 months, dependent on action group goal-setting targets
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
  1. Staff morale measured using survey at 0-12 months, dependent on action group goal-setting targets
Completion date31/03/2027

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit100 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration17
Key inclusion criteriaPeople using services:
1. Autistic adults, including those who do not use speech, have co-occurring learning disabilities, or require intensive support
2. Aged 18+ years
3. Living in one of the two participating residential or supported living services

Staff employed at either of the participating services, including support workers, senior support workers, team leaders and managers

Family members or close friends who visit or remain regularly involved in the life of an autistic adult living in the service
Key exclusion criteria1. Individuals who are not within one of the key participant categories (i.e. who are not autistic residents, support staff or managers employed by participating services, or family members / close friends with an ongoing relationship to a resident)
2. Individuals with a direct supervisory or governance role over the research project (e.g. steering committee or advisory group members), in order to avoid conflicts of interest
Date of first enrolment16/03/2026
Date of final enrolment31/03/2027

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Anonymised for the protection of participants, as these are small specialist services and naming them could easily make individuals identifiable
Anonymised
Anonymised
Anonymised
England

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol file version 1.3 02/02/2026 06/03/2026 No No

Additional files

49154 EQUALS Protocol_v1.3 02-02-2026.pdf
Protocol file

Editorial Notes

06/03/2026: Trial's existence confirmed by London - Camberwell St Giles Research Ethics Committee.