Glycaemic control in labour with diabetes (GILD Trial)

ISRCTN ISRCTN13019598
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13019598
IRAS number 333765
Secondary identifying numbers CPMS 58451, NIHR159223
Submission date
10/07/2025
Registration date
16/07/2025
Last edited
16/07/2025
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Diabetes during pregnancy affects about 9 in every 100 women or birthing people. Most of these cases are gestational diabetes (GDM), which develops during pregnancy and usually goes away after birth. During labour or before a planned caesarean, people with GDM are often closely monitored to keep their blood sugar levels in a safe range. However, some find this monitoring uncomfortable or intrusive. New research suggests that very tight control of blood sugar during labour might not be as necessary as once thought. This study will compare two approaches—tight control and a more relaxed approach—to see how they affect the birth experience, the baby’s health, and overall outcomes.

Who can participate?
You may be able to take part if you:
-Have gestational diabetes
-Are aged 16 years or over (or under 16 years if considered able to consent)
-Are expecting one baby (not twins or more)
-Are planning to give birth at 37 weeks or later
-Can give informed consent

What does the study involve?
If you join the study, you’ll be randomly placed into one of two groups during labour:
-One group will have their blood sugar checked every hour, aiming to keep levels between 4–7 mmol/L.
-The other group will have checks every 2–4 hours, with a wider target range of 4–10 mmol/L.
If your blood sugar goes outside the target range, you’ll be treated with insulin as part of usual care.
Researchers will also ask you about your experience of the monitoring and your birth.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Taking part in the study may not directly benefit participants, but the information we collect from this study may help us to understand more about the best way to monitor blood sugars during labour in people with gestational diabetes. This may be of benefit to participants' in a future pregnancy and may help all women/birthing people with GDM in the future.
Whilst recent research suggests tight monitoring of blood sugars may not be as important for preventing problems in the baby as once thought, we do not know which one is better for women/birthing people and their babies. That is why we are doing this study. When women's blood sugars are monitored in labour closely, about 10 in every 100 babies (i.e., 10%} have low blood sugars after birth, which could mean the baby is admitted to the neonatal unit, away from their Mum, for treatment. If a woman/birthing person's blood sugars are monitored labour in a 'more relaxed' approach, we think about 15 in 100 babies (i.e., 15%} might have low blood sugars after birth, but we don't know - it might be slightly less, it might be slightly more.
There are no physical risks from completing the questionnaires or optional discussions. It is possible that thinking and talking sensitive topics such as gestational diabetes and birth experience may cause feelings of anxiety.

Where is the study run from?
University of Nottingham (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2024 to January 2028

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK).

Who is the main contact?
GILD@nottingham.ac.uk

Contact information

Dr Samantha Harrison
Public

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Applied Health Research Building, University Park
Nottingham
NG7 2RD
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-1872-953X
Email GILD@nottingham.ac.uk
Prof Kate Walker
Scientific, Principal Investigator

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Applied Health Research Building, University Park
Nottingham
NG7 2RD
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-5794-7324
Email GILD@nottingham.ac.uk

Study information

Study designInterventional randomized controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet 47644 GILD Trial Participant Information Sheet_v1.1_12June2025.pdf
Scientific titleThe clinical and cost effectiveness of tight versus more relaxed glucose control around the time of birth in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes (GILD)
Study acronymGILD
Study objectives‘More relaxed’ blood glucose control is non inferior to ‘tight’ control around the time of birth for women/birthing people with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) for risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia and neonatal unit admission
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 16/06/2025, East of England - Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (2 Redman Place, Stratford, London, E20 1JQ, United Kingdom; +44 2071048181; cambridgeeast.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 25/EE/0116

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedGlycaemic control in labour with diabetes
InterventionMain study
When the woman/birthing person comes into hospital to birth their baby, the clinical team providing intrapartum care will follow the glucose monitoring strategy as per randomised allocation:
Tight monitoring (comparator) – glucose finger prick testing will be conducted hourly, and the acceptable blood sugar range will be 4–7 mmol/L.
More relaxed monitoring (intervention) – glucose finger prick testing will be conducted every 2–4 hours, and the acceptable blood sugar range will be 4–10 mmol/L.
Glucose testing by finger prick testing will commence from the point of:
i) admission in either spontaneous established labour, or
ii) following artificial rupture of membranes or onset of regular contractions following induction of labour, or
iii) admission for elective caesarean section
Data on the birth, maternal health outcomes and neonatal health outcomes will be collected between admission for birth and hospital discharge. At the time of discharge, women/birthing people will complete questionnaires about their birth experience and quality of life. A follow-up questionnaire will also be completed at 6 weeks after birth and an economic evaluation will be undertaken.
To determine acceptability of more relaxed glucose control, some women/birthing people and healthcare practitioners will be interviewed.

Qualitative sub-study
Women/birthing people: Approximately 20 women/birthing people will be purposively sampled via a pre-defined sampling matrix. At the point of consent for the main trial, women/birthing people can give optional consent to be contacted about the qualitative sub-study. At around 6 weeks post-birth the women/birthing people will be provided with an information sheet about the qualitative sub-study and if they agree to take part an interview will be arranged for between 6 and 12 weeks post-birth. Verbal consent will be collected and recorded by the researcher before the start of the interview. Interviews will last around 30–45 minutes and will follow an interview theme guide. A £25 shopping voucher will be offered as a token of appreciation upon interview completion.
Healthcare professionals: One-to-one semi-structured interviews will be conducted with approximately 20–30 health professionals (e.g. clinical midwives, neonatologists, obstetricians, diabetes specialists) or until data richness is achieved from participating sites, who have experience of either caring for women/birthing people who have been randomised to the more relaxed blood glucose monitoring strategy or caring for infants born to women/birthing people who were randomised to more relaxed control. Purposive sampling will ensure health professionals of different career stages, ethnicities and locations are included. A remote interview, via telephone or video call, will be convened at a mutually convenient time. Consent will be taken verbally and recorded electronically at the beginning of the interview. Health professionals will be offered the opportunity to enter into a £250 prize draw upon completion of interview.

Study within a trial (SWAT)
Participating sites will be randomised on a 1:1 allocation to receiving standard recruitment materials or standard recruitment materials plus an inclusivity package. The inclusivity package will include bespoke trial recruitment materials for South Asian women/birthing people, cultural awareness training for site staff provided in line with the site initiation training, and community connectors. Community connectors will be women/birthing people with lived experience of gestational diabetes who will provide ad-hoc informal peer-support to women/birthing people who are considering joining the trial. Sites will be randomised using a minimisation algorithm balancing on baseline South Asian ethnicity at site (ONS/site level data). Randomisation will be by NCTU prior to site initiation.
Sites not randomised to receive the inclusivity package will receive standard trial recruitment materials. To ensure these sites are still supported to recruit underserved groups, including South Asian women/birthing people, standard trial materials will be translated to the top five languages at the participating sites.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureCo-Primary outcomes:
1. Neonatal hypoglycaemia, as defined by a blood glucose level of <2 mmol/L at any time and/or a single value of <2.5 mmol/L in a baby with abnormal clinical signs. Tested using a blood gas analyser, between birth and neonatal discharge after birth.
2. Neonatal unit admission (any level; 1-3) at any point between birth and neonatal discharge after birth measured using patient records.
Secondary outcome measuresMeasured using patient records (unless noted otherwise):

Secondary outcomes (neonatal):
1. Outcome of birth, defined as live/stillbirth.
2. Symptomatic neonatal hypoglycaemia, measured on a ‘symptoms checklist’ between birth and neonatal discharge after birth.
3. Treatment for neonatal hypoglycaemia between birth and neonatal discharge after birth.
4. Duration of neonatal unit admission between birth and neonatal discharge after birth.
5. Neonatal hypothermia, defined as any episode <36.5C between birth and neonatal discharge after birth.
6. Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) requiring active therapeutic hypothermia between birth and neonatal discharge after birth.
7. Neonatal death less than or equal to 28 days since birth.
8. Breastfeeding, captured in the CRF between birth and neonatal discharge, and a participant-completed questionnaire at 6 weeks post-birth.

Secondary outcomes (maternal)
9. Maternal hypoglycaemia defined as blood glucose < 3.5mmol/L, measured using capillary blood glucose values during admission for birth.
10. Maternal admission to critical care, between admission for birth and maternal discharge after birth.
11. Postnatal depression. Measured using the Edinburgh Postnatal Questionnaire, completed by the participant 6 weeks after birth.
Secondary outcomes (treatment acceptability and adherence)
12. Maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience. Measured by Birth Satisfaction Scale Revied (validated questionnaire) and selected questions from the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire v2 6 weeks after birth.
13. Maternal satisfaction with blood glucose monitoring strategy. Measured using a study-specific questionnaire at maternal discharge after birth.
14. Woman/birthing person able to eat/drink what they want around the time of birth. Measured via participant-completed questionnaire at maternal discharge after birth.
Secondary outcomes (cost effectiveness)
15. Maternal health-related quality of life, measured using the EQ-5D-5L at baseline, maternal hospital discharge and 6 weeks post-birth.

Secondary outcomes (resource use)
16. The main resources to be monitored include: i) The costs associated with glucose monitoring in labour for both more relaxed control and tight control groups; ii) Time and resource use incurred in NHS secondary care due to maternal or neonatal hypoglycaemia, admission of mothers or babies to neonatal care (any level, 1-3) or to treat any other adverse events; iii) Duration of hospital stay for the woman/birthing person and the baby; iv) Maternal or neonatal re-admissions to secondary care or attendances at primary care or unscheduled postnatal outpatient contacts due to complications attributable to GDM. Measured using participant completed questionnaires at maternal hospital discharge after birth and at 6 weeks post-birth, and data collected from medical records.

Secondary outcomes (acceptability)
17. Acceptability of a more relaxed or tight blood glucose monitoring strategy from the perspective of women/birthing people and healthcare professionals. Measured via qualitative semi-structured interviews between 6-12 weeks after birth.
Secondary outcomes (SWAT)
18. The number of South Asian women/birthing people: i) approached for participation in the trial; ii) who give consent to participate; iii) who are randomised. All proportionate to the number of South Asian women/birthing people at each site. Measured from screening logs and trial enrolment.
Overall study start date01/10/2024
Completion date31/01/2028

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit14 Years
SexFemale
Target number of participants1630
Key inclusion criteria1. Women/birthing people with gestational diabetes mellitus
2. Aged 16 years or over (or < 16 years if deemed Gillick competent).
3. Singleton pregnancy
4. Able to provide informed consent
5. Planned birth >=37 weeks gestation
Key exclusion criteria1. Known lethal fetal anomaly
2. At time of consent, known clinical indication to recommend birth < 37 weeks
Date of first enrolment01/07/2025
Date of final enrolment31/12/2026

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
West Middlesex University Hospital
Twickenham Road
Isleworth
TW7 6AF
United Kingdom
Calderdale Royal Hospital
Godfrey Road
Salterhebble
Halifax
HX3 0PW
United Kingdom
Chesterfield Royal Hospital
Chesterfield Road
Calow
Chesterfield
S44 5BL
United Kingdom
Jessops Wing
Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Glossop Road
Sheffield
S10 2JF
United Kingdom
Watford General Hospital
Vicarage Road
Watford
WD18 0HB
United Kingdom
Princess Anne Hospital
Coxford Road
Southampton
SO16 5YA
United Kingdom
Northwick Park Hospital
Watford Road
Harrow
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Musgrove Park Hospital (taunton)
Musgrove Park Hospital
Taunton
TA1 5DA
United Kingdom
Royal London Hospital
Whitechapel Road
Whitechapel
London
E1 1BB
United Kingdom
King George's Hospital
Barley Lane
Ilford
IG3 8YB
United Kingdom
Royal Sussex County Hospital
Eastern Road
Brighton
BN2 5BE
United Kingdom
Princess Royal Hospital
Lewes Road
Haywards Heath
RH16 4EX
United Kingdom
St Richards Hospital
Spitalfield Lane
Chichester
PO19 6SE
United Kingdom
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Egerton Road
Guildford
GU2 7XX
United Kingdom
St Marys Hospital
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Bradford Royal Infirmary
Duckworth Lane
Bradford
BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom
Croydon University Hospital
530 London Road
Thornton Heath
CR7 7YE
United Kingdom
Burnley General Hospital
Casterton Avenue
Burnley
BB10 2PQ
United Kingdom
St Thomas' Hospital
Westminster Bridge Road
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom
University Hospital Wishaw
50 Netherton Street
Wishaw
ML2 0DP
United Kingdom
Queens Medical Centre
Derby Road
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Royal Berkshire Hospital
London Road
Reading
RG1 5AN
United Kingdom
University Hospital Lewisham
Lewisham High Street
London
SE13 6LH
United Kingdom
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Woolwich Stadium Road
Woolwich
London
SE18 4QH
United Kingdom
East Surrey Hospital
Canada Avenue
Redhill
RH1 5RH
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University of Nottingham
University/education

University Park
Nottingham
NG7 2RD
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 115 951 5151
Email sponsor@nottingham.ac.uk
Website http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/01ee9ar58

Funders

Funder type

Government

NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies Co-ordinating Centre (NETSCC)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a peer-reviewed journal
IPD sharing planThe current data sharing plans for this study are unknown and will be available at a later date

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Participant information sheet version 1.1 12/06/2025 16/07/2025 No Yes

Additional files

47644 GILD Trial Participant Information Sheet_v1.1_12June2025.pdf

Editorial Notes

10/07/2025: Trial's existence confirmed by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK).