Glycaemic control in labour with diabetes (GILD Trial)
ISRCTN | ISRCTN13019598 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13019598 |
IRAS number | 333765 |
Secondary identifying numbers | CPMS 58451, NIHR159223 |
- Submission date
- 10/07/2025
- Registration date
- 16/07/2025
- Last edited
- 16/07/2025
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Pregnancy and Childbirth
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Diabetes during pregnancy affects about 9 in every 100 women or birthing people. Most of these cases are gestational diabetes (GDM), which develops during pregnancy and usually goes away after birth. During labour or before a planned caesarean, people with GDM are often closely monitored to keep their blood sugar levels in a safe range. However, some find this monitoring uncomfortable or intrusive. New research suggests that very tight control of blood sugar during labour might not be as necessary as once thought. This study will compare two approaches—tight control and a more relaxed approach—to see how they affect the birth experience, the baby’s health, and overall outcomes.
Who can participate?
You may be able to take part if you:
-Have gestational diabetes
-Are aged 16 years or over (or under 16 years if considered able to consent)
-Are expecting one baby (not twins or more)
-Are planning to give birth at 37 weeks or later
-Can give informed consent
What does the study involve?
If you join the study, you’ll be randomly placed into one of two groups during labour:
-One group will have their blood sugar checked every hour, aiming to keep levels between 4–7 mmol/L.
-The other group will have checks every 2–4 hours, with a wider target range of 4–10 mmol/L.
If your blood sugar goes outside the target range, you’ll be treated with insulin as part of usual care.
Researchers will also ask you about your experience of the monitoring and your birth.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Taking part in the study may not directly benefit participants, but the information we collect from this study may help us to understand more about the best way to monitor blood sugars during labour in people with gestational diabetes. This may be of benefit to participants' in a future pregnancy and may help all women/birthing people with GDM in the future.
Whilst recent research suggests tight monitoring of blood sugars may not be as important for preventing problems in the baby as once thought, we do not know which one is better for women/birthing people and their babies. That is why we are doing this study. When women's blood sugars are monitored in labour closely, about 10 in every 100 babies (i.e., 10%} have low blood sugars after birth, which could mean the baby is admitted to the neonatal unit, away from their Mum, for treatment. If a woman/birthing person's blood sugars are monitored labour in a 'more relaxed' approach, we think about 15 in 100 babies (i.e., 15%} might have low blood sugars after birth, but we don't know - it might be slightly less, it might be slightly more.
There are no physical risks from completing the questionnaires or optional discussions. It is possible that thinking and talking sensitive topics such as gestational diabetes and birth experience may cause feelings of anxiety.
Where is the study run from?
University of Nottingham (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2024 to January 2028
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK).
Who is the main contact?
GILD@nottingham.ac.uk
Contact information
Public
Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Applied Health Research Building, University Park
Nottingham
NG7 2RD
United Kingdom
0000-0003-1872-953X | |
GILD@nottingham.ac.uk |
Scientific, Principal Investigator
Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Applied Health Research Building, University Park
Nottingham
NG7 2RD
United Kingdom
0000-0001-5794-7324 | |
GILD@nottingham.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Interventional randomized controlled trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Other |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | 47644 GILD Trial Participant Information Sheet_v1.1_12June2025.pdf |
Scientific title | The clinical and cost effectiveness of tight versus more relaxed glucose control around the time of birth in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes (GILD) |
Study acronym | GILD |
Study objectives | ‘More relaxed’ blood glucose control is non inferior to ‘tight’ control around the time of birth for women/birthing people with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) for risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia and neonatal unit admission |
Ethics approval(s) |
Approved 16/06/2025, East of England - Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (2 Redman Place, Stratford, London, E20 1JQ, United Kingdom; +44 2071048181; cambridgeeast.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 25/EE/0116 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Glycaemic control in labour with diabetes |
Intervention | Main study When the woman/birthing person comes into hospital to birth their baby, the clinical team providing intrapartum care will follow the glucose monitoring strategy as per randomised allocation: Tight monitoring (comparator) – glucose finger prick testing will be conducted hourly, and the acceptable blood sugar range will be 4–7 mmol/L. More relaxed monitoring (intervention) – glucose finger prick testing will be conducted every 2–4 hours, and the acceptable blood sugar range will be 4–10 mmol/L. Glucose testing by finger prick testing will commence from the point of: i) admission in either spontaneous established labour, or ii) following artificial rupture of membranes or onset of regular contractions following induction of labour, or iii) admission for elective caesarean section Data on the birth, maternal health outcomes and neonatal health outcomes will be collected between admission for birth and hospital discharge. At the time of discharge, women/birthing people will complete questionnaires about their birth experience and quality of life. A follow-up questionnaire will also be completed at 6 weeks after birth and an economic evaluation will be undertaken. To determine acceptability of more relaxed glucose control, some women/birthing people and healthcare practitioners will be interviewed. Qualitative sub-study Women/birthing people: Approximately 20 women/birthing people will be purposively sampled via a pre-defined sampling matrix. At the point of consent for the main trial, women/birthing people can give optional consent to be contacted about the qualitative sub-study. At around 6 weeks post-birth the women/birthing people will be provided with an information sheet about the qualitative sub-study and if they agree to take part an interview will be arranged for between 6 and 12 weeks post-birth. Verbal consent will be collected and recorded by the researcher before the start of the interview. Interviews will last around 30–45 minutes and will follow an interview theme guide. A £25 shopping voucher will be offered as a token of appreciation upon interview completion. Healthcare professionals: One-to-one semi-structured interviews will be conducted with approximately 20–30 health professionals (e.g. clinical midwives, neonatologists, obstetricians, diabetes specialists) or until data richness is achieved from participating sites, who have experience of either caring for women/birthing people who have been randomised to the more relaxed blood glucose monitoring strategy or caring for infants born to women/birthing people who were randomised to more relaxed control. Purposive sampling will ensure health professionals of different career stages, ethnicities and locations are included. A remote interview, via telephone or video call, will be convened at a mutually convenient time. Consent will be taken verbally and recorded electronically at the beginning of the interview. Health professionals will be offered the opportunity to enter into a £250 prize draw upon completion of interview. Study within a trial (SWAT) Participating sites will be randomised on a 1:1 allocation to receiving standard recruitment materials or standard recruitment materials plus an inclusivity package. The inclusivity package will include bespoke trial recruitment materials for South Asian women/birthing people, cultural awareness training for site staff provided in line with the site initiation training, and community connectors. Community connectors will be women/birthing people with lived experience of gestational diabetes who will provide ad-hoc informal peer-support to women/birthing people who are considering joining the trial. Sites will be randomised using a minimisation algorithm balancing on baseline South Asian ethnicity at site (ONS/site level data). Randomisation will be by NCTU prior to site initiation. Sites not randomised to receive the inclusivity package will receive standard trial recruitment materials. To ensure these sites are still supported to recruit underserved groups, including South Asian women/birthing people, standard trial materials will be translated to the top five languages at the participating sites. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | Co-Primary outcomes: 1. Neonatal hypoglycaemia, as defined by a blood glucose level of <2 mmol/L at any time and/or a single value of <2.5 mmol/L in a baby with abnormal clinical signs. Tested using a blood gas analyser, between birth and neonatal discharge after birth. 2. Neonatal unit admission (any level; 1-3) at any point between birth and neonatal discharge after birth measured using patient records. |
Secondary outcome measures | Measured using patient records (unless noted otherwise): Secondary outcomes (neonatal): 1. Outcome of birth, defined as live/stillbirth. 2. Symptomatic neonatal hypoglycaemia, measured on a ‘symptoms checklist’ between birth and neonatal discharge after birth. 3. Treatment for neonatal hypoglycaemia between birth and neonatal discharge after birth. 4. Duration of neonatal unit admission between birth and neonatal discharge after birth. 5. Neonatal hypothermia, defined as any episode <36.5C between birth and neonatal discharge after birth. 6. Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) requiring active therapeutic hypothermia between birth and neonatal discharge after birth. 7. Neonatal death less than or equal to 28 days since birth. 8. Breastfeeding, captured in the CRF between birth and neonatal discharge, and a participant-completed questionnaire at 6 weeks post-birth. Secondary outcomes (maternal) 9. Maternal hypoglycaemia defined as blood glucose < 3.5mmol/L, measured using capillary blood glucose values during admission for birth. 10. Maternal admission to critical care, between admission for birth and maternal discharge after birth. 11. Postnatal depression. Measured using the Edinburgh Postnatal Questionnaire, completed by the participant 6 weeks after birth. Secondary outcomes (treatment acceptability and adherence) 12. Maternal satisfaction with childbirth experience. Measured by Birth Satisfaction Scale Revied (validated questionnaire) and selected questions from the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire v2 6 weeks after birth. 13. Maternal satisfaction with blood glucose monitoring strategy. Measured using a study-specific questionnaire at maternal discharge after birth. 14. Woman/birthing person able to eat/drink what they want around the time of birth. Measured via participant-completed questionnaire at maternal discharge after birth. Secondary outcomes (cost effectiveness) 15. Maternal health-related quality of life, measured using the EQ-5D-5L at baseline, maternal hospital discharge and 6 weeks post-birth. Secondary outcomes (resource use) 16. The main resources to be monitored include: i) The costs associated with glucose monitoring in labour for both more relaxed control and tight control groups; ii) Time and resource use incurred in NHS secondary care due to maternal or neonatal hypoglycaemia, admission of mothers or babies to neonatal care (any level, 1-3) or to treat any other adverse events; iii) Duration of hospital stay for the woman/birthing person and the baby; iv) Maternal or neonatal re-admissions to secondary care or attendances at primary care or unscheduled postnatal outpatient contacts due to complications attributable to GDM. Measured using participant completed questionnaires at maternal hospital discharge after birth and at 6 weeks post-birth, and data collected from medical records. Secondary outcomes (acceptability) 17. Acceptability of a more relaxed or tight blood glucose monitoring strategy from the perspective of women/birthing people and healthcare professionals. Measured via qualitative semi-structured interviews between 6-12 weeks after birth. Secondary outcomes (SWAT) 18. The number of South Asian women/birthing people: i) approached for participation in the trial; ii) who give consent to participate; iii) who are randomised. All proportionate to the number of South Asian women/birthing people at each site. Measured from screening logs and trial enrolment. |
Overall study start date | 01/10/2024 |
Completion date | 31/01/2028 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 14 Years |
Sex | Female |
Target number of participants | 1630 |
Key inclusion criteria | 1. Women/birthing people with gestational diabetes mellitus 2. Aged 16 years or over (or < 16 years if deemed Gillick competent). 3. Singleton pregnancy 4. Able to provide informed consent 5. Planned birth >=37 weeks gestation |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Known lethal fetal anomaly 2. At time of consent, known clinical indication to recommend birth < 37 weeks |
Date of first enrolment | 01/07/2025 |
Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2026 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- United Kingdom
Study participating centres
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Isleworth
TW7 6AF
United Kingdom
Salterhebble
Halifax
HX3 0PW
United Kingdom
Calow
Chesterfield
S44 5BL
United Kingdom
Glossop Road
Sheffield
S10 2JF
United Kingdom
Watford
WD18 0HB
United Kingdom
Southampton
SO16 5YA
United Kingdom
Harrow
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Taunton
TA1 5DA
United Kingdom
Whitechapel
London
E1 1BB
United Kingdom
Ilford
IG3 8YB
United Kingdom
Brighton
BN2 5BE
United Kingdom
Haywards Heath
RH16 4EX
United Kingdom
Chichester
PO19 6SE
United Kingdom
Guildford
GU2 7XX
United Kingdom
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Bradford
BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom
Thornton Heath
CR7 7YE
United Kingdom
Burnley
BB10 2PQ
United Kingdom
London
SE1 7EH
United Kingdom
Wishaw
ML2 0DP
United Kingdom
Nottingham
NG7 2UH
United Kingdom
Reading
RG1 5AN
United Kingdom
London
SE13 6LH
United Kingdom
Woolwich
London
SE18 4QH
United Kingdom
Redhill
RH1 5RH
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
University/education
University Park
Nottingham
NG7 2RD
England
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 115 951 5151 |
---|---|
sponsor@nottingham.ac.uk | |
Website | http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/ |
https://ror.org/01ee9ar58 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
No information available
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
IPD sharing plan summary | Data sharing statement to be made available at a later date |
Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication in a peer-reviewed journal |
IPD sharing plan | The current data sharing plans for this study are unknown and will be available at a later date |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participant information sheet | version 1.1 | 12/06/2025 | 16/07/2025 | No | Yes |
Additional files
Editorial Notes
10/07/2025: Trial's existence confirmed by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK).