SPECIAL: Standard or Palliative Care in Advanced Lung Cancer - Does early referral of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer to UK specialist palliative care services make a difference in their quality of life or survival?
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN13337289 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13337289 |
| Protocol serial number | HTA 11/108/06; sponsor's ref : STH17019; University of Birmingham ref : LU3006 |
| Sponsor | Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| Funder | National Institute for Health Research |
- Submission date
- 02/06/2015
- Registration date
- 17/06/2015
- Last edited
- 24/08/2022
- Recruitment status
- Stopped
- Overall study status
- Stopped
- Condition category
- Cancer
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Public
Cancer Research (UK) Clinical Trials Unit
School of Cancer Sciences
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B29 2TT
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)121 414 6372 |
|---|---|
| SPECIAL@trials.bham.ac.uk |
Scientific
c/o Trial Co-ordinator
Cancer Research (UK) Clinical Trials Unit
School of Cancer Sciences
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2TT
United Kingdom
| Phone | +44 (0)121 414 6372 |
|---|---|
| SPECIAL@trials.bham.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Phase III randomised controlled trial with integral feasibility stage (non-randomised) |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | A phase III randomised trial, with integral feasibility stage, to assess changes in quality of life and survival in patients being referred for early than versus standard specialist palliative care on being diagnosed with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. |
| Study acronym | SPECIAL |
| Study objectives | Palliative care services in the UK have have traditionally been provided for patients with advanced cancer by local and national independent charitable organisations. Recent progress in anticancer treatments means that increasingly patients with advanced disease may still be receiving active interventions into the late stages of disease. Thus it is important for both the National Health Service and other providers to undertake research into new models of care in advanced cancer, in which anticancer treatment and patient/family-directed supportive and palliative care services are simultaneously provided. To help direct supportive and palliative care interventions, the National Cancer Action Team has recommended that all patients with cancer should receive Holistic Needs Assessment (HNA) at key points of their trajectory from diagnosis, after primary treatment, through continuing disease into end of life care or into survivorship. As patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often have a high symptom burden at diagnosis this patient group is in particular need of HNA at the point of diagnosis as well as through their ongoing care. Holistic needs include not only physical symptoms but also psychological, social, spiritual, financial issues; problems with independent living; concerns about treatments and side-effects; and information needs. Many services are not yet using any formal means of assessing holistic needs though there is a range of HNA tools available with the Distress Thermometer/Concerns Checklist or the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care (SPARC) most commonly used in the UK (Ahmedzai et al., 2008). A single-centre study in USA found that patients with advanced NSCLC randomised to early palliative care had improved quality of life parameters and also achieved a longer survival time compared to patients who had palliative care according to standard procedures (Temel et al, 2010). The SPECIAL trial has been designed to address the question of whether early referral to palliative care services in the UK achieves the same range of benefits as those observed in the US study, given that the availability, structure and funding of palliative care are so different in the two countries. It further asks the question whether a formal holistic needs assessment enhances the referral to palliative care. References : Ahmedzai SH, K.G., Rogers E, Noble B, SPARC: a holistic screening questionnaire for palliative and supportive care needs. J Palliat Care 2008. 24(3): p. 194-195. Temel, J.S., et al., Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med, 2010. 363(8): p. 733-42. More details can be found at http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/projects/hta/1110806 Protocol can be found at http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/117428/PRO-11-108-06.pdf |
| Ethics approval(s) | UK REC North West – Greater Manchester (West), 22/05/2015, ref: 15/NW/0324 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer; specialist palliative care |
| Intervention | Feasibility study : All patients will be asked to complete a Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care (SPARC) holistic needs questionnaire (a copy of the last form completed by the patient to be sent with the referral letter to specialist palliative care (SPC), if and when this occurs). Randomised trial: Study arms: Arm A : Standard of care (i.e., standard referral to SPC, if patient is willing) Arm B : sub-randomisation Arm B1 : Early SPC referral + standard of care Arm B2 : Early SPC referral + standard of care + SPARC assessment |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Feasibility study : |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Randomised trial: |
| Completion date | 03/03/2016 |
| Reason abandoned (if study stopped) | Participant recruitment issue |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Mixed |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 585 |
| Total final enrolment | 4 |
| Key inclusion criteria | Patients : 1. Any adult (≥18 years) patient with newly diagnosed stage IV non-small cell lung cancer, with histologically confirmed diagnosis 2. ECOG performance score 0-3 Carers: Must be caring for a patient participant of the trial. NB. A patient's involvement in the trial is not dependent upon having a carer willing and able to take part also. |
| Key exclusion criteria | 1. ECOG performance score 4 2. Prognosis of ≤2 weeks 3. Participation in another local competing supportive or palliative care trial 4. Dementia, delirium or other lack of capacity or communication which renders the patient unable to participate in the trial 5. Any other psychological disorder which, in the view of the investigator, renders the patient unable to participate 6. Unable to communicate in English or with the use of an interpreter |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/09/2015 |
| Date of final enrolment | 03/03/2016 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
- Scotland
Study participating centres
Sheffield
S10 2JF
United Kingdom
Glasgow
G12 0XH
United Kingdom
Birmingham
B15 2TH
United Kingdom
Birmingham
B18 7QH
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not expected to be made available |
| IPD sharing plan | Not provided at time of registration |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HRA research summary | 26/07/2023 | No | No | ||
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
| Protocol (other) | 08/04/2016 | 12/04/2022 | No | No | |
| Study website | Study website | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Editorial Notes
24/08/2022: The following changes have been made:
1. The overall trial end date has been changed from 31/12/2019 to 03/03/2016.
2. The total final enrolment number has been added.
3. The IPD sharing summary has been changed from "Available on request" to "Not expected to be made available".
12/04/2022: The following changes have been made:
1. The recruitment end date has been changed from 31/08/2018 to 03/03/2016.
2. A protocol link has been added.
11/11/2016: The study was abandoned on 01/03/2016 as participant recruitment did not meet required target set by funding body.