A double-blind multi-centre randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of methylprednisolone injections in the treatment of Morton's neuroma

ISRCTN ISRCTN13668166
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13668166
Secondary identifying numbers 2001/RUO/04
Submission date
03/10/2008
Registration date
12/11/2008
Last edited
05/03/2015
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nervous System Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Colin Thompson
Scientific

School of Health Sciences
Queen Margaret University
Edinburgh
EH21 6UU
United Kingdom

Email cthomson@qmu.ac.uk

Study information

Study designIncremental cost-effectiveness analysis and single-blind pragmatic randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Scientific titleA double-blind multi-centre randomised controlled trial to investigate the effectiveness of methylprednisolone injections in the treatment of Morton's neuroma
Study acronymMoRTISE
Study objectivesThe trial is designed primarily to address the question: is local injection of steroid (methylprednisolone) an effective treatment for Morton's neuroma? Thus we seek to test the following null hypothesis: that steroid injections are as effective as anaesthetic injections for the pain and the effects of pain associated with Morton's neuroma.
Ethics approval(s)Lothian Research Ethics Committee (Orthopaedic surgery/surgery Research ethics sub-committee), 23/11/2000, ref: LREC/2000/5/31
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedMorton's neuroma
InterventionParticipants will be allocated to receive steroid and anaesthetic (injection of 1 ml methylprednisolone and 1 ml 2% lignocaine) or just anaesthetic (2 ml of 1% lignocaine). All ultrasound examinations and injections will be performed by the same musculoskeletal radiologist using an ATL HDI 5000 (Seattle, Washington) with a 7-12MHz transducer. Neuroma will be injected by a plantar approach. Patients will receive only a single injection and patints will be reviewed clinically after 3 months.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Applicable
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Methylprednisolone
Primary outcome measure1. Patient completed booklet of outcome measures, comprehensive yet brief, will cover the following domains:
1.1. Foot Health Status - the Foot Thermometer, a validated 10 cm visual analogue scale of foot health, will be the primary outcome measure. A validated questionnaire-based measure of foot health status will complement it.
1.2. Functional Disability - the Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Schedule has been validated for use as a measure of disability specifically associated with foot pain
1.3. Pain - the Multidimensional Affect and Pain Survey (MAPS) is a widely validated questionnaire developed from cluster analysis of common descriptors for pain and its effects. It covers three dimensions: pain as a sensory experience; suffering associated with pain; and uniquely, for this type of measurement tool, general well-being in the presence of pain.
1.4. General Health Status - the EuroQol, a single validated index for describing and valuing health states. It consists of five items - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression - and a visual analogue scale of global health status.
2. Need for surgical excision of the digital nerve, based on explicit criteria
3. The size of the neuroma, as determined by ultrasonic scan

All measured at 1 month, 3 months and 12 months.
Secondary outcome measuresPatients will receive essentially the same outcome booklets as above 1, 3 and 12 months after treatment. In the case of non-response to postal questionnaires, the research secretary will send out written reminders to patients after 1 and 2 weeks: the research secretary will also contact patients by telephone at the time of posting the second reminder. Additional clinical information, such as adverse events, will be documented by the trial clinical co-ordinator at the clinical review appointment after four months. This information will be forwarded, by post, directly to the research secretary as part of the usual routine of clinical documentation.
Overall study start date01/08/2003
Completion date31/07/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants150 patients (75 in each group)
Key inclusion criteriaAll patients (adult, either sex) referred to outpatient clinics at The Royal Infirmary Edinburgh (RIE), St John's Hospital Livingston and Queen Margaret University College (QMUC) with a diagnosis of Morton's neuroma, confirmed by a diagnostic ultrasound scan, will be considered for inclusion in the trial.
Key exclusion criteria1. Contraindications to methylprednisolone or lignocaine such as pregnancy, breast-feeding or peripheral vascular disease
2. Communication difficulties as judged by the recruiting clinician
3. Received a recent injection of steroid for Morton's neuroma
Date of first enrolment01/08/2003
Date of final enrolment31/07/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Queen Margaret University
Edinburgh
EH21 6UU
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Queen Margaret University (UK)
University/education

Queen Margaret University Drive
Edinburgh
EH21 6UU
Scotland
United Kingdom

Email jtait@qmu.ac.uk
Website http://www.qmu.ac.uk/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/002g3cb31

Funders

Funder type

Government

Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department (UK)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/05/2013 Yes No
Results article economic evaluation results 25/02/2015 Yes No