A prospective, randomised pilot study in the management of neonates at risk of hypoglycaemia (34 weeks to term) by oral feeding using preterm formula.
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN13668937 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13668937 |
| Protocol serial number | N0084144605 |
| Sponsor | Department of Health |
| Funder | Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Trust (UK), NHS R&D Support Funding |
- Submission date
- 30/09/2005
- Registration date
- 30/09/2005
- Last edited
- 08/04/2014
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Neonatal Diseases
Plain English summary of protocol
Not provided at time of registration
Contact information
Scientific
Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust
Scunthorpe General Hospital
Cliff Gardens
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Scientific title | |
| Study objectives | Preterm formula milk, having a higher calorie density than standard formula, is beneficial in maintaining blood glucose levels in neonates at high risk of hypoglycaemia. |
| Ethics approval(s) | Not provided at time of registration |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Neonatal Diseases |
| Intervention | Randomisation of at least 10 in each arm, routine management of cannulation and intravenous glucose or oral feeding of Preterm formula. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
The two groups are compared using independent t-tests. So calculating means or proportions per group with 95% Cls for the difference between means or proportions as appropriate. If there is an element of repeated measures (i.e. if measuring each person more than once) then calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for each group and then compare the AUCs for binary categorical data odds ratios again with 95% CIs, can be used. Somewhere, an arbitrary level of 5% significance (two-tailed) will be assumed. Randomisation will be according to a random numbers table. Even split can not be done with a small sample. Due to small sample, the method of minimisation may be used, when randomising, or randomise using blocks. |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Not provided at time of registration |
| Completion date | 04/04/2005 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Neonate |
| Sex | Not Specified |
| Target sample size at registration | 20 |
| Key inclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
| Key exclusion criteria | Not provided at time of registration |
| Date of first enrolment | 05/04/2004 |
| Date of final enrolment | 04/04/2005 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centre
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Not provided at time of registration |
| IPD sharing plan |