A prospective, randomised pilot study in the management of neonates at risk of hypoglycaemia (34 weeks to term) by oral feeding using preterm formula.

ISRCTN ISRCTN13668937
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN13668937
Protocol serial number N0084144605
Sponsor Department of Health
Funder Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Trust (UK), NHS R&D Support Funding
Submission date
30/09/2005
Registration date
30/09/2005
Last edited
08/04/2014
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Neonatal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr James Devlin
Scientific

Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust
Scunthorpe General Hospital
Cliff Gardens
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised controlled trial
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectivesPreterm formula milk, having a higher calorie density than standard formula, is beneficial in maintaining blood glucose levels in neonates at high risk of hypoglycaemia.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedNeonatal Diseases
InterventionRandomisation of at least 10 in each arm, routine management of cannulation and intravenous glucose or oral feeding of Preterm formula.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

The two groups are compared using independent t-tests. So calculating means or proportions per group with 95% Cls for the difference between means or proportions as appropriate. If there is an element of repeated measures (i.e. if measuring each person more than once) then calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for each group and then compare the AUCs for binary categorical data odds ratios again with 95% CIs, can be used. Somewhere, an arbitrary level of 5% significance (two-tailed) will be assumed. Randomisation will be according to a random numbers table. Even split can not be done with a small sample. Due to small sample, the method of minimisation may be used, when randomising, or randomise using blocks.

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

Not provided at time of registration

Completion date04/04/2005

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupNeonate
SexNot Specified
Target sample size at registration20
Key inclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment05/04/2004
Date of final enrolment04/04/2005

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Northern Lincolnshire & Goole Hospitals NHS Trust
Scunthorpe
DN15 7BH
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan