A study to test a new way of more accurately measuring kidney function using fingerprick blood samples

ISRCTN ISRCTN14717076
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14717076
IRAS number 304466
Secondary identifying numbers S21KID09-S, IRAS 304466, CPMS 51877
Submission date
27/07/2022
Registration date
28/07/2022
Last edited
04/08/2022
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Urological and Genital Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Blood tests used in kidney clinics estimate rather than measure kidney function. This means that they may not always be accurate. Here is also evidence that this inaccuracy affects some people more than others and may create health inequality. Clinical gold standard ways of actually measuring kidney function are time-consuming, expensive and have only limited availability. There is another gold standard test which involves injecting a dye and taking three or four blood tests over 5-6 hours to see how quickly the kidneys are removing this dye. This can be done in a routine way by injecting the dye when people come to clinic appointments and giving them a small kit that will allow them to take fingerprick blood samples at home later that day and post them back.

Who can participate?
Adult patients with chronic kidney disease attending renal outpatient appointments

What does the study involve?
Participants will be given a small injection of a dye when they come to the clinic and then have an extra teaspoon of blood with their usual clinic bloods and be shown how to use the fingerprick test kit. They will do the first fingerprick test in the clinic. They will take the kit home and do more tests 3, 4, and 5 hours later. Finally, they complete a feedback survey and everything is then posted back using a pack provided.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
There is a small risk of allergic reaction as the dye contains iodine.

Where is the study run from?
Salford Royal Hospital (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2021 to August 2023

Who is funding the study?
Investigator initiated and funded

Who is the main contact?
Prof. Darren Green, darren.green@nca.nhs.uk

Contact information

Prof Darren Green
Principal Investigator

Dept Renal Medicine
Hope Building
Stott Lane
Salford
M6 8HD
United Kingdom

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-9370-8176
Phone +44 (0)161 789 7373
Email darren.green@nca.nhs.uk

Study information

Study designSingle-centre observational cohort study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCohort study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeDiagnostic
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleImproving the accuracy of chronic kidney disease monitoring using postal finger prick iohexol measured glomerular filtration rate
Study objectivesThe primary aim of the study is to show that iohexol measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) can be undertaken with a high level of accuracy by healthcare professionals and patients together using microstamping test kits at home after an injection of iohexol at an outpatient appointment.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 01/03/2022, West of Scotland REC 4 (Ward 11, Dykebar Hospital, Grahamston Road, Paisley, PA2 7DE, UK; +44 (0)141 314 0213; WoSREC4@ggc.scot.nhs.uk), ref: 22/WS/0016
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPatients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) where creatinine-based eGFR calculation may give spurious results
InterventionPatients will be recruited from the renal outpatient department. Patients will receive a 5 ml bolus of Omnipaque followed by paired venous and fingerprick bloods 5 minutes post injection (time zero). Outpatients will have their appointment as usual and then go home with a home blood testing kit. Further fingerpick bloods will be taken by the patient at time points 3, 4 and 5 hours post-injection. The samples will be posted to the lab by the patient using an envelope provided in the kit. This can be done at any point in the 5 days after sample collection. An optional feedback survey will also be in the pack for completion and return. This is then the end of the study involvement.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureBland Altman comparison of fingerprick versus “gold standard” venous iohexol levels at time 0 using bias and P30 measurements
Secondary outcome measuresPercentage of participants in whom mGFR results differ from clinically used eGFR results to the extent that treatment is likely to have differed (e.g. drug dosing) had mGFR been used for clinical decision making at the time of study visit
Overall study start date21/12/2021
Completion date01/08/2023

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexBoth
Target number of participants40
Key inclusion criteriaAdult patients with CKD
Key exclusion criteria1. Iodine intolerance
2. Unable to provide consent
3. Unable to perform fingerprick blood testing
Date of first enrolment02/08/2022
Date of final enrolment31/07/2023

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Salford Royal Hospital
Stott Lane
Eccles
Salford
M6 8HD
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust
Hospital/treatment centre

1st Floor, Summerfield House
544 Eccles New Road
Salford
M5 5AP
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1612067050
Email NCA.Research@srft.nhs.uk

Funders

Funder type

Other

Investigator initiated and funded

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/12/2023
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryPublished as a supplement to the results publication
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal
IPD sharing planAn anonymised dataset will be produced and supplied as a supplement at the time of publication

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Editorial Notes

04/08/2022: Internal review.
28/07/2022: Trial's existence confirmed by the HRA.