ISRCTN ISRCTN14951861
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN14951861
Secondary identifying numbers N0120148502
Submission date
29/09/2006
Registration date
29/09/2006
Last edited
06/04/2009
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Duncan Raistrick
Scientific

Addictions Unit
19 Springfield Mount
Woodhouse
Leeds
LS2 9NG
United Kingdom

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Not specified
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study objectivesTo investigate whether buprenorphine opiate detoxification regime can be considered to be at least as clinically effective as a lofexidine regime, which was taken at the reference treatment.
Ethics approval(s)Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedMental and Behavioural Disorders: Drug addiction
InterventionThe study was a randomised controlled trial (RCT) using a non-inferiority approach. Non-inferiority is demonstrated if, within a 95% confidence interval, buprenorphine performs within a preset tolerance limit of clinically acceptable differences in outcomes, completion rates between the two treatments.

Individual ready for heroin detoxification were given information about the trial and invited to participate. Consenting participants were then randomised to one of the two treatments. Detoxification was undertaken in a specialist outpatient clinic according to pre-defined protocols. The detoxification procedure required that this was an open label trial. The primary outcome was whether or not an individual completed the detoxification. Completion of the planned detoxification was taken to be an objective marker of both the acceptability of the pharmacotherapy and also the effectiveness of the detoxification procedure in the clinic. Abstinence at one-month follow-up was taken as an indicator of overall treatment effectiveness and was used as a secondary outcome measure.

The difference in completion proportions between the two treatments was then tested to determine whether or not the treatments could be considered clinically equivalent. Data were also collected for individuals who declined randomisation and instead chose their treatment. Additional secondary outcome measures were substance use, dependence, psychological health, social satisfaction and treatment satisfaction.
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Buprenorphine, lofexidine
Primary outcome measureThe primary outcome was whether or not an individual completed the detoxification.
Secondary outcome measuresAbstinence at one-month follow-up was taken as an indicator of overall treatment effectiveness and was used as a secondary outcome measure.
Overall study start date01/05/2000
Completion date30/09/2004

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
SexNot Specified
Target number of participantsNot provided at time of registration
Key inclusion criteriaIndividual ready for heroin detoxification who agreed to take part in the trial.
Key exclusion criteriaNot provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment01/05/2000
Date of final enrolment30/09/2004

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centre

Addictions Unit
Leeds
LS2 9NG
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2006 Update - Department of Health
Government

The Department of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall
London
SW1A 2NL
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)20 7307 2622
Email dhmail@doh.gsi.org.uk
Website http://www.dh.gov.uk/Home/fs/en

Funders

Funder type

Government

Leeds Mental Health Teaching NHS Trust (UK) NHS R&D Support Funding

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/12/2005 Yes No