Biomarkers for RAtional Investigation for Neurological Decision Support in traumatic brain injury (BRaINS-TBI): cohort study with a nested pragmatic randomised controlled trial
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN15031322 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15031322 |
| Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) | 354593 |
| Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS) | 57709 |
| National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) | 159241 |
| Sponsors | University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust |
| Funder | Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme |
- Submission date
- 03/11/2025
- Registration date
- 18/11/2025
- Last edited
- 18/11/2025
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Every year, over a million people in the UK go to the Emergency Department (ED) with a head injury. Most of these are mild, but some can lead to serious problems later. Right now, doctors use symptoms and CT scans to decide how serious the injury is, but this isn’t always accurate.
The BRaINS-TBI study is looking at whether a simple blood test can help doctors make better decisions. These tests look for “biomarkers” – tiny signals in the blood that may show if someone has a brain injury. The study also wants to find out if using these tests can improve care and reduce unnecessary scans.
Who can participate?
People who come to the ED with a mild head injury may be invited to take part. The study also includes healthy volunteers and people with other types of injuries (not involving the head) to help compare results.
What does the study involve?
Participants may be asked to give a blood sample and share information about their injury and recovery. Some people will be randomly chosen to have their blood test results shared with their doctor to help guide care.
Follow-up will happen over the next six months, either by phone, online questionnaires, or in-person visits.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Taking part could help improve how head injuries are treated in the future. It may also help reduce unnecessary CT scans and improve long-term outcomes.
Risks are low – giving a blood sample is safe, and all personal information will be kept confidential. Participation is voluntary, and people can leave the study at any time.
Where is the study run from?
University of Cambridge (UK)
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
October 2025 to June 2027.
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Emma Flanagan, e.flanagan@uea.ac.uk
Contact information
Public, Scientific, Principal investigator
University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine
Perioperative Acute Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (PACE) Division
Box 93 Addenbrooke's Hospital
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
United Kingdom
| 0000-0001-6044-9035 | |
| Phone | +44 1223586585 |
| vfjn2@cam.ac.uk |
Public
Norwich Clinical Trials Unit
University of East Anglia
Norwich
NR4 7TJ
United Kingdom
| 0000-0003-1492-7061 | |
| Phone | +44 1603597306 |
| e.flanagan@uea.ac.uk |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Multi-centre prospective observational cohort study with nested interventional randomized controlled trial |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Scientific title | Biomarkers for RAtional Investigation for Neurological Decision Support in traumatic brain injury (BRaINS-TBI): cohort study with a nested pragmatic randomised trial |
| Study acronym | BRaINS-TBI |
| Study objectives | We aim to carry out a large study across multiple hospitals to find out whether certain substances in the blood (called biomarkers) can help predict how people will recover in the months after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The study also includes a smaller randomised trial to test whether two specific blood biomarkers (UCH-L1 and GFAP),when used together with existing clinical guidelines (the NICE head injury rules), can help doctors decide more accurately who needs a CT brain scan. 1. In adults who present to an ED with a head injury, can biomarkers be used to identify patients at high risk of ongoing problems and so help to rationally assign patients to ongoing clinical care and follow up pathways? 2. Can biomarkers be used to identify which patients require a CT head to rule out a clinically important intracranial injury? |
| Ethics approval(s) |
Submitted 01/10/2025, East of England - Essex Research Ethics Committee (2 Redman Place, London, EC20 1 JQ, United Kingdom; +44 207 104 8106; essex.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 25/EE/0233 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Traumatic brain injury |
| Intervention | BRaINS-TBI has two components: 1. BRaINS-TBI Predict – a prospective observational cohort study. 2. BRaINS-TBI CT – a nested pragmatic randomised controlled trial evaluating the impact of using i-STAT TBI test biomarker results to support CT decision-making in the emergency department (ED). For the nested randomised controlled trial (BRaINS-TBI CT): Aim: To determine whether integrating i-STAT biomarker results with existing NICE CT head rules improves decision-making regarding CT scanning in adults with mild TBI. Study arms: Arm A: Biomarker-Informed Pathway (Intervention Arm) Participants receive standard NHS care plus the i-STAT TBI test. The biomarker results (UCH-L1 and GFAP) are released to the treating ED clinician in real time and may be used alongside NICE guidance to support the decision on whether to perform a CT head scan. All other aspects of care follow standard clinical practice. Arm B: Standard Care Pathway (Control Arm) Participants receive standard clinical assessment and management according to NICE NG232 Head Injury Guidelines. The biomarker sample is still taken for research purposes, but results are not made available to the clinical team at the point of care and do not influence treatment, with participants in this arm having decisions for CT made according to standard care. Randomisation Process Eligible participants are randomised in the ED using a secure web-based randomisation system managed by the Norwich Clinical Trials Unit. Randomisation is 1:1, stratified by site, and uses variable block sizes to ensure allocation concealment. The trial is unblinded due to the nature of the intervention (clinicians must know whether biomarker results are available). Follow-up Duration for both RCT arms Participants in both arms are followed for 6 months, at the same time points and using the same outcome measures as the observational cohort: 2–4-week follow-up 3-month follow-up 6-month follow-up Follow-up includes validated and exploratory questionnaires, resource-use data, and clinical outcome measures such as the GOSE. |
| Intervention type | Device |
| Phase | Not Applicable |
| Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s) | Abbott i-STAT™ Alinity System (i-STAT TBI test cartridge) |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
For the observational cohort (BRaINS-TBI Predict): |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
For the observational cohort (BRaINS-TBI Predict): |
| Completion date | 30/06/2027 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Healthy volunteer, Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Mixed |
| Lower age limit | 16 Years |
| Upper age limit | 100 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 2482 |
| Key inclusion criteria | BRaINS-TBI Predict (Observational Cohort Study) Patients who have sustained a head injury: 1. ≥ 16 years of age 2. Glasgow Coma Score 13, 14, or 15 3. Presentation within 24 hours of sustaining a head injury 4. Meet criteria to be assessed for consideration of a head CT using NICE NG232 clinical decision support tool (CDST). 5. Patients with a prior history of TBI which required clinical assessment but occurred more than 1 year prior may still be included. Non-head injury trauma patient controls: 6. ≥ 16 years of age 7. Glasgow Coma Score 15 or at cognitive baseline 8. Presentation within 24 hours of trauma to part of body other than head. No head injury noted by patient and/or witnesses Healthy Volunteers: 9. Adult ≥ 16 years of age BRaINS-TBI CT (Nested RCT): 1. ≥ 18 years of age 2. Glasgow Coma Score 13, 14, or 15 3. Presentation within 24 hours of head injury 4. When assessed using NICE NG232 clinical decision support tool (CDST) found to have loss of consciousness or amnesia plus any of 4.1. Age 65 years or over 4.2. Any bleeding or clotting disorders (liver failure, haemophilia, taking anticoagulants or antiplatelets) 4.3. Dangerous mechanism of injury (a pedestrian or cyclist struck by a motor vehicle, an occupant ejected from a motor vehicle, or fall from a height of more than 1m or 5 stairs) 4.4. More than 30 minutes’ retrograde amnesia of events immediately before the head injury 4.5. Subjects on anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, excluding aspirin monotherapy, with no other high or medium risk features and shared decision making positive for CT |
| Key exclusion criteria | BRaINS-TBI Predict (Observational Cohort Study) Patients who have sustained a head injury: 1. Participant without capacity and no available patient legal representative or professional consultee available. 2. Participant with capacity unwilling to provide informed consent 3. Unable to adequately understand written and verbal English for consent and assessments unless an appropriate translator is available. Non-head injury trauma patient controls: 4. Any evidence of a current head injury 5. History of a previous head injury requiring medical care. 6. Participant without capacity and no available patient legal representative or professional consultee. 7. Participant with capacity unwilling to provide informed consent 8. Unable to adequately understand written and verbal English for consent and assessments unless an appropriate translator is available. Healthy Volunteers: 9. Prior history of head injury/traumatic brain injury requiring medical assessment or care 10. Other significant neurological disease requiring ongoing treatment/management BRaINS-TBI CT (Nested RCT): 1. Low risk TBI according to NICE-CDR 2. Significant extra-cranial injury for which a full trauma CT would usually be indicated. 3. Any NICE Guideline (NG232) high risk criteria 3.1. GCS ≤ 12 on initial assessment in the ED (aside from intoxicated subjects with no other concerning features) 3.2. Suspected open or depressed skull fracture 3.3. Any sign of basal skull fracture (haemotympanum, 'panda' eyes, cerebrospinal fluid leakage from the ear or nose, Battle's sign) 3.4. Post-traumatic seizure 3.5. Focal neurological deficit 3.6. More than 1 episode of vomiting |
| Date of first enrolment | 01/12/2025 |
| Date of final enrolment | 31/12/2026 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
- Scotland
- Wales
Study participating centres
Hills Road
Cambridge
CB2 0QQ
England
2 Eday Road
Aberdeen
AB15 6RE
Scotland
Uttoxeter Road
Derby
DE22 3NE
England
1055 Great Western Road
Glasgow
G12 0XH
Scotland
Prescot Street
Liverpool
L7 8XP
England
Headley Way
Headington
Oxford
OX3 9DU
England
Derriford Road
Derriford
Plymouth
PL6 8DH
England
London Road
Reading
RG1 5AN
England
Stott Lane
Salford
M6 8HD
England
Herries Road
Sheffield
S5 7AU
England
80 Newark Street
London
E1 2ES
England
Tonna Uchaf
Tonna
Neath
SA11 3LX
Wales
Colney
Norwich
NR4 7UY
England
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Stored in publicly available repository |
| IPD sharing plan | De-identified participant data (demographics, biomarker results, CT findings, outcomes) will be shared after publication of primary analyses via the secure UK TBI-REPORTER data repository (https://tbi-reporter.uk/). Access will be granted to researchers for ethically approved studies in line with NIHR and sponsor data-sharing policies. Supporting documents (protocol, SAP, data dictionary) will be available on request from NCTU. |
Editorial Notes
17/11/2025: Trial's existence confirmed by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK).