CAMELOT - Continuous rectus sheath Analgesia in eMErgency LaparOTomy

ISRCTN ISRCTN15475290
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15475290
IRAS number 312553
Secondary identifying numbers IRAS 312553, Sponsor Number: CRI0420, Funder ID: NIHR133554, CPMS 53589
Submission date
04/08/2022
Registration date
09/08/2022
Last edited
04/09/2023
Recruitment status
Recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Surgery
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
In the UK around 30,000 patients, a year undergo an operation called an emergency laparotomy to treat life-threatening conditions. A large vertical cut is made in the abdomen when patients are asleep under general anesthesia. Good pain relief after surgery will help patients feel better and recover quicker. Because of the high level of pain experienced by many patients, opioid-based painkillers such as morphine are often given, using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps. However, morphine can cause serious side effects such as breathing problems, nausea and vomiting, and delayed bowel movement, which can slow patient recovery. Rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are a newer way of providing pain relief, where two thin tubes (catheters) are inserted on either side of the wound during the operation. Local anesthetic is injected slowly into the catheters to numb the nerves and reduce pain for about three days. Small studies suggest that RSCs may provide effective pain relief, reduce the use of morphine, and help patient recovery. Potential disadvantages are that RSCs take time to insert and are expensive. More work is needed to understand whether there are any unwanted effects with RSCs.

This study will find out whether adding a RSCs to standard patient-controlled analgesia provides better pain relief, fewer side effects and complications, and greater satisfaction for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy compared to a control group who will receive a sham catheter with no infusion of analgesia. Our study will also aim to determine whether RSCs are safe and cost-effective.

Who can participate?
Adults who are due to undergo emergency laparotomy surgery.

What does the study involve?
Participants will be allocated to one of two groups, with an equal chance of being in either group (like tossing a coin). An active Rectus Sheath Catheter (RSC) with a constant infusion of local anesthesia for 72 h from the end of surgery will be given to one group of participants. The other group will receive a sham rectus sheath catheter with an inactive infusion device in place for 72 h from the end of surgery. Participants and researchers will not have a choice in which of the two treatments will be given to each participant and will not know which treatment participants have received during the study.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The benefits of the CAMELOT study are that we hope that patients will have less pain after their operation and that their recovery/discharge time may be quicker.

The risks for participating in the CAMELOT study are associated with the ‘active’ rectus sheath catheter and are extremely rare. Particpiants will be actively monitored throughout the study for any possible side effects. Some of the rare risks are described below:
1. Disconnection. Occasionally the RSCs may become accidentally disconnected from the pump. If this happens, we will remove the RSCs to prevent infection, and you will be able to have other forms of pain relief.
2. Infection. This will be actively monitored by the participant’s clinician who will treat accordingly and remove the RSC.
3. Bleeding. This will be actively monitored by the participant’s clinician who will treat accordingly and remove the RSC.

Where is the study run from?
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
From January 2022 to October 2026

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Jonathan Evans, camelot-trial@bristol.ac.uk

Contact information

Mr Jonathan Evans
Public

Trial Coordinator - CAMELOT
Bristol Trials Centre (BTC)
1-5 Whiteladies Road
Clifton
Bristol
BS8 1NU
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)117 455 1591
Email camelot-trial@bristol.ac.uk

Study information

Study designMulti-centre, double-blind, pragmatic, parallel-group, superiority randomized sham-controlled trial with an internal pilot phase to determine feasibility of recruitment and protocol adherence
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleCAMELOT - Continuous rectus sheath Analgesia in eMErgency LaparOTomy. A Multi-centre, randomised sham-controlled trial of rectus sheath catheter-delivered local anaesthetic infusion compared with usual care in patients undergoing emergency bowel surgery.
Study acronymCAMELOT
Study hypothesisThe use of a rectus sheath catheter (RSC)-delivered local anaesthetic infusion in addition to standard analgesia, is superior to standard analgesia without RSC for postoperative pain control.
Ethics approval(s)Approved 24/08/2022, London - Bromley Research Ethics Committee (Meeting held by video-conference via Zoom; +44 (0)207 104 8105; bromley.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 22/LO/0555
ConditionUse of rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) in patients undergoing emergency bowel surgery.
InterventionCAMELOT is a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial in NHS hospitals, with a 12-month internal pilot phase and active follow-up for 6 months post-surgery.

Patients who are undergoing an emergency laparotomy surgery via a midline incision and eligible for inclusion in the National Emergency
Laparotomy Audit (NELA) will be randomised after their midline incision has been performed and before the start of surgical closure, using a secure internet-based randomisation system ensuring allocation concealment. Participants will be allocated into one of two groups via a 1:1 ratio:
1. Insertion of an active RSC with infusion of standard local analgesia for 72 hours from the end of surgery
2. A sham RSC, placed on the skin of surgical site by adhesive dressing and not delivering any local anaesthetic for 72 hours, from the end of surgery
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measurePostoperative pain control measured using the Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) over the first 5 postoperative days
Secondary outcome measures1. Postoperative complications measured using the incidence of the following postoperative complications with severity of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher collected in the CRF/patient records within 30-days of randomisation:
1.1. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC)
1.2. Respiratory failure
1.3. Paralytic ileus
1.4. Incisional surgical site infection
1.5. Rectus sheath catheter/infusion-related complications
2. Time to tracheal extubation (in days) measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records between randomisation and the day of tracheal extubation
3. Time to return of bowel function (in days) measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records between randomisation and the day of the return of bowel function
4. Time to first mobilisation (in days) measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records between randomisation and the day of first mobilisation
5. Pain intensity at rest and on movement measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
6. Postoperative opioid use measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records in the first five days from the end of surgery
7. Mortality measured using the incidence of death collected in the CRF/patient records at 30 and 90 days from the date of randomisation
8. Chronic postoperative pain measured using the Brief Pain Inventory at 3 and 6 months from the date of randomisation
9. Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ5D-5L at 3 days, and 3 and 6 months from the date of randomisation
10. Return to work and activity measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health (WPAI:GH) at 3 and 6 months from the date of randomisation
Overall study start date22/01/2022
Overall study end date26/10/2026

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants750
Participant inclusion criteria1. Aged ≥18 years
2. Undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery via a midline incision
3. Eligible for inclusion in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA)
Participant exclusion criteriaCurrent participant exclusion criteria:
1. Planned epidural anaesthesia
2. Clinician refusal
3. Lack of mental capacity to consent to trial participation
4. Contraindications to RSC including allergy to local anaesthetic (LA), anatomical factors making RSC insertion impossible
5. Existing co-enrolment in another clinical study if:
5.1. The intervention in the other study is expected to influence the primary outcome (this will be considered by a senior clinician on a case-by-case basis)
5.2. It is considered too burdensome for the patient; or
5.3. It is not permitted by the other study
6. Previous enrolment in the CAMELOT trial



Previous participant exclusion criteria:
1. Clinician or patient refusal to participate
2. Planned epidural anaesthesia
3. Contraindications to Rectus Sheath Catheter (RSC) including allergy to local anaesthetic (LA)
4. Anatomical factors making RSC insertion impossible
Recruitment start date25/01/2023
Recruitment end date01/09/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • England
  • Scotland
  • United Kingdom

Study participating centres

North Bristol NHS Trust
Southmead Hospital
Southmead Road
Westbury-on-trym
Bristol
BS10 5NB
United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
St. James's University Hospital
Beckett Street
Leeds
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Medway Maritime Hospital
Windmill Road
Gillingham
ME7 5NY
United Kingdom
Musgrove Park Hospital
Musgrove Park
Taunton
TA1 5DA
United Kingdom
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Corsebar Road
Paisley
PA2 9PN
United Kingdom
Barts Health NHS Trust
The Royal London Hospital
80 Newark Street
London
E1 2ES
United Kingdom
The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
Russells Hall Hospital
Pensnett Road
Dudley
DY1 2HQ
United Kingdom
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Victoria Hospital
Whinney Heys Road
Blackpool
FY3 8NR
United Kingdom
City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
Sunderland Royal Hospital
Kayll Road
Sunderland
SR4 7TP
United Kingdom
Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Great Western Hospital
Marlborough Road
Swindon
SN3 6BB
United Kingdom
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Mindelsohn Way
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2GW
United Kingdom
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
New Cross Hospital
Wolverhampton Road
Heath Town
Wolverhampton
WV10 0QP
United Kingdom
Royal Derby Hospital
Uttoxeter Road
Derby
DE22 3NE
United Kingdom
Royal Liverpool University Hospital NHS Trust
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Prescot Street
Liverpool
L7 8XP
United Kingdom
Croydon University Hospital
London Road
Croydon
CR7 7YE
United Kingdom
York Hospitals NHS Trust Hq
York Hospital
Wigginton Road
York
YO31 8HE
United Kingdom
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Cobbett House
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Ayrshire Central Hospital
Kilwinning Road
Irvine
KA12 8SS
United Kingdom
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
J B Russell House
Gartnavel Royal Hospital
1055 Great Western Road Glasgow
Glasgow
G12 0XH
United Kingdom
South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust
Middlesbrough General Hospital
Ayresome Green Lane
Middlesbrough
TS5 5AZ
United Kingdom
Heartlands Hospital
Bordesley Green East
Bordesley Green
Birmingham
B9 5ST
United Kingdom
Medway NHS Foundation Trust
Medway Maritime Hospital
Windmill Road
Gillingham
ME7 5NY
United Kingdom

Sponsor information

University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Hospital/treatment centre

R&D Department
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Level E, Laboratory & Pathology Block
SCBR - Mailpoint 138
Tremona Road
Southampton
SO16 6YD
England
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)2381205146
Email sharon.davies-dear@uhs.nhs.uk
Website http://www.uhs.nhs.uk/home.aspx
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/0485axj58

Funders

Funder type

Government

National Institute for Health and Care Research
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
Location
United Kingdom
Health Technology Assessment Programme
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
Location
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date26/10/2026
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal.
IPD sharing planData will not be made available for sharing until after publication of the main results of the study unless agreed by the Chief Investigator/Trial Management Group on a case-by-case basis. Thereafter, anonymised individual patient data will be made available for secondary research, conditional on assurance from the secondary researcher that the proposed use of the data is compliant with the MRC Policy on Data Sharing regarding scientific quality, ethical requirements, and value for money. A minimum requirement with respect to scientific quality will be a publicly available pre-specified protocol describing the purpose, methods, and analysis of the secondary research, e.g. a protocol for a Cochrane systematic review. Please contact Mark Edwards using the following email: camelot-trial@bristol.ac.uk.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol file version 1.0 01/07/2022 22/12/2022 No No
Protocol file version 2.0 12/04/2023 03/05/2023 No No
HRA research summary 28/06/2023 No No

Additional files

ISRCTN15475290 CAMELOT_Protocol_v1.0_01July2022.pdf
ISRCTN15475290_Protocol_v2.0_12April2023.pdf

Editorial Notes

04/09/2023: The following changes were made:
1. The public contact was changed.
2. Medway NHS Foundation Trust was added as a study participating centre.
22/06/2023: The study participating centre 'Heartlands Hospital' was added.
03/05/2023: Uploaded protocol (not peer reviewed)
24/02/2023: The following changes have been made:
1. Ethics approval added.
2. The participant exclusion criteria have been changed.
3. The recruitment start date has been changed from 01/11/2022 to 25/01/2023.
22/12/2022: The following changes have been made:
1. Uploaded protocol (not peer reviewed)
2. The public contact has been changed and the plain English summary updated accordingly.
29/09/2022: The recruitment start date was changed from 01/09/2022 to 01/11/2022.
05/09/2022: Internal review.
04/08/2022: Trial’s existence confirmed by the National Institute for Health and Care Research.