CAMELOT - Continuous rectus sheath Analgesia in eMErgency LaparOTomy
ISRCTN | ISRCTN15475290 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15475290 |
IRAS number | 312553 |
Secondary identifying numbers | IRAS 312553, Sponsor Number: CRI0420, Funder ID: NIHR133554, CPMS 53589 |
- Submission date
- 04/08/2022
- Registration date
- 09/08/2022
- Last edited
- 04/09/2023
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Overall study status
- Ongoing
- Condition category
- Surgery
Plain English Summary
Background and study aims
In the UK around 30,000 patients, a year undergo an operation called an emergency laparotomy to treat life-threatening conditions. A large vertical cut is made in the abdomen when patients are asleep under general anesthesia. Good pain relief after surgery will help patients feel better and recover quicker. Because of the high level of pain experienced by many patients, opioid-based painkillers such as morphine are often given, using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps. However, morphine can cause serious side effects such as breathing problems, nausea and vomiting, and delayed bowel movement, which can slow patient recovery. Rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are a newer way of providing pain relief, where two thin tubes (catheters) are inserted on either side of the wound during the operation. Local anesthetic is injected slowly into the catheters to numb the nerves and reduce pain for about three days. Small studies suggest that RSCs may provide effective pain relief, reduce the use of morphine, and help patient recovery. Potential disadvantages are that RSCs take time to insert and are expensive. More work is needed to understand whether there are any unwanted effects with RSCs.
This study will find out whether adding a RSCs to standard patient-controlled analgesia provides better pain relief, fewer side effects and complications, and greater satisfaction for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy compared to a control group who will receive a sham catheter with no infusion of analgesia. Our study will also aim to determine whether RSCs are safe and cost-effective.
Who can participate?
Adults who are due to undergo emergency laparotomy surgery.
What does the study involve?
Participants will be allocated to one of two groups, with an equal chance of being in either group (like tossing a coin). An active Rectus Sheath Catheter (RSC) with a constant infusion of local anesthesia for 72 h from the end of surgery will be given to one group of participants. The other group will receive a sham rectus sheath catheter with an inactive infusion device in place for 72 h from the end of surgery. Participants and researchers will not have a choice in which of the two treatments will be given to each participant and will not know which treatment participants have received during the study.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The benefits of the CAMELOT study are that we hope that patients will have less pain after their operation and that their recovery/discharge time may be quicker.
The risks for participating in the CAMELOT study are associated with the ‘active’ rectus sheath catheter and are extremely rare. Particpiants will be actively monitored throughout the study for any possible side effects. Some of the rare risks are described below:
1. Disconnection. Occasionally the RSCs may become accidentally disconnected from the pump. If this happens, we will remove the RSCs to prevent infection, and you will be able to have other forms of pain relief.
2. Infection. This will be actively monitored by the participant’s clinician who will treat accordingly and remove the RSC.
3. Bleeding. This will be actively monitored by the participant’s clinician who will treat accordingly and remove the RSC.
Where is the study run from?
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UK)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
From January 2022 to October 2026
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Jonathan Evans, camelot-trial@bristol.ac.uk
Contact information
Public
Trial Coordinator - CAMELOT
Bristol Trials Centre (BTC)
1-5 Whiteladies Road
Clifton
Bristol
BS8 1NU
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)117 455 1591 |
---|---|
camelot-trial@bristol.ac.uk |
Study information
Study design | Multi-centre, double-blind, pragmatic, parallel-group, superiority randomized sham-controlled trial with an internal pilot phase to determine feasibility of recruitment and protocol adherence |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
Study setting(s) | Hospital |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a participant information sheet |
Scientific title | CAMELOT - Continuous rectus sheath Analgesia in eMErgency LaparOTomy. A Multi-centre, randomised sham-controlled trial of rectus sheath catheter-delivered local anaesthetic infusion compared with usual care in patients undergoing emergency bowel surgery. |
Study acronym | CAMELOT |
Study hypothesis | The use of a rectus sheath catheter (RSC)-delivered local anaesthetic infusion in addition to standard analgesia, is superior to standard analgesia without RSC for postoperative pain control. |
Ethics approval(s) | Approved 24/08/2022, London - Bromley Research Ethics Committee (Meeting held by video-conference via Zoom; +44 (0)207 104 8105; bromley.rec@hra.nhs.uk), ref: 22/LO/0555 |
Condition | Use of rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) in patients undergoing emergency bowel surgery. |
Intervention | CAMELOT is a multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial in NHS hospitals, with a 12-month internal pilot phase and active follow-up for 6 months post-surgery. Patients who are undergoing an emergency laparotomy surgery via a midline incision and eligible for inclusion in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) will be randomised after their midline incision has been performed and before the start of surgical closure, using a secure internet-based randomisation system ensuring allocation concealment. Participants will be allocated into one of two groups via a 1:1 ratio: 1. Insertion of an active RSC with infusion of standard local analgesia for 72 hours from the end of surgery 2. A sham RSC, placed on the skin of surgical site by adhesive dressing and not delivering any local anaesthetic for 72 hours, from the end of surgery |
Intervention type | Procedure/Surgery |
Primary outcome measure | Postoperative pain control measured using the Overall Benefit of Analgesia Score (OBAS) over the first 5 postoperative days |
Secondary outcome measures | 1. Postoperative complications measured using the incidence of the following postoperative complications with severity of Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher collected in the CRF/patient records within 30-days of randomisation: 1.1. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) 1.2. Respiratory failure 1.3. Paralytic ileus 1.4. Incisional surgical site infection 1.5. Rectus sheath catheter/infusion-related complications 2. Time to tracheal extubation (in days) measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records between randomisation and the day of tracheal extubation 3. Time to return of bowel function (in days) measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records between randomisation and the day of the return of bowel function 4. Time to first mobilisation (in days) measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records between randomisation and the day of first mobilisation 5. Pain intensity at rest and on movement measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 6. Postoperative opioid use measured using data collected in the CRF/patient records in the first five days from the end of surgery 7. Mortality measured using the incidence of death collected in the CRF/patient records at 30 and 90 days from the date of randomisation 8. Chronic postoperative pain measured using the Brief Pain Inventory at 3 and 6 months from the date of randomisation 9. Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ5D-5L at 3 days, and 3 and 6 months from the date of randomisation 10. Return to work and activity measured using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: General Health (WPAI:GH) at 3 and 6 months from the date of randomisation |
Overall study start date | 22/01/2022 |
Overall study end date | 26/10/2026 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Adult |
Lower age limit | 18 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 750 |
Participant inclusion criteria | 1. Aged ≥18 years 2. Undergoing emergency laparotomy surgery via a midline incision 3. Eligible for inclusion in the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) |
Participant exclusion criteria | Current participant exclusion criteria: 1. Planned epidural anaesthesia 2. Clinician refusal 3. Lack of mental capacity to consent to trial participation 4. Contraindications to RSC including allergy to local anaesthetic (LA), anatomical factors making RSC insertion impossible 5. Existing co-enrolment in another clinical study if: 5.1. The intervention in the other study is expected to influence the primary outcome (this will be considered by a senior clinician on a case-by-case basis) 5.2. It is considered too burdensome for the patient; or 5.3. It is not permitted by the other study 6. Previous enrolment in the CAMELOT trial Previous participant exclusion criteria: 1. Clinician or patient refusal to participate 2. Planned epidural anaesthesia 3. Contraindications to Rectus Sheath Catheter (RSC) including allergy to local anaesthetic (LA) 4. Anatomical factors making RSC insertion impossible |
Recruitment start date | 25/01/2023 |
Recruitment end date | 01/09/2025 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- England
- Scotland
- United Kingdom
Study participating centres
Southmead Road
Westbury-on-trym
Bristol
BS10 5NB
United Kingdom
Beckett Street
Leeds
LS9 7TF
United Kingdom
Windmill Road
Gillingham
ME7 5NY
United Kingdom
Taunton
TA1 5DA
United Kingdom
Paisley
PA2 9PN
United Kingdom
80 Newark Street
London
E1 2ES
United Kingdom
Pensnett Road
Dudley
DY1 2HQ
United Kingdom
Whinney Heys Road
Blackpool
FY3 8NR
United Kingdom
Kayll Road
Sunderland
SR4 7TP
United Kingdom
Marlborough Road
Swindon
SN3 6BB
United Kingdom
Mindelsohn Way
Edgbaston
Birmingham
B15 2GW
United Kingdom
Wolverhampton Road
Heath Town
Wolverhampton
WV10 0QP
United Kingdom
Derby
DE22 3NE
United Kingdom
Prescot Street
Liverpool
L7 8XP
United Kingdom
Croydon
CR7 7YE
United Kingdom
Wigginton Road
York
YO31 8HE
United Kingdom
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9WL
United Kingdom
Irvine
KA12 8SS
United Kingdom
Gartnavel Royal Hospital
1055 Great Western Road Glasgow
Glasgow
G12 0XH
United Kingdom
Ayresome Green Lane
Middlesbrough
TS5 5AZ
United Kingdom
Bordesley Green
Birmingham
B9 5ST
United Kingdom
Windmill Road
Gillingham
ME7 5NY
United Kingdom
Sponsor information
Hospital/treatment centre
R&D Department
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Level E, Laboratory & Pathology Block
SCBR - Mailpoint 138
Tremona Road
Southampton
SO16 6YD
England
United Kingdom
Phone | +44 (0)2381205146 |
---|---|
sharon.davies-dear@uhs.nhs.uk | |
Website | http://www.uhs.nhs.uk/home.aspx |
https://ror.org/0485axj58 |
Funders
Funder type
Government
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Research, NIHRresearch, NIHR - National Institute for Health Research, NIHR (The National Institute for Health and Care Research), NIHR
- Location
- United Kingdom
Government organisation / National government
- Alternative name(s)
- NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme, HTA
- Location
- United Kingdom
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | 26/10/2026 |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
IPD sharing plan summary | Available on request |
Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal. |
IPD sharing plan | Data will not be made available for sharing until after publication of the main results of the study unless agreed by the Chief Investigator/Trial Management Group on a case-by-case basis. Thereafter, anonymised individual patient data will be made available for secondary research, conditional on assurance from the secondary researcher that the proposed use of the data is compliant with the MRC Policy on Data Sharing regarding scientific quality, ethical requirements, and value for money. A minimum requirement with respect to scientific quality will be a publicly available pre-specified protocol describing the purpose, methods, and analysis of the secondary research, e.g. a protocol for a Cochrane systematic review. Please contact Mark Edwards using the following email: camelot-trial@bristol.ac.uk. |
Study outputs
Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol file | version 1.0 | 01/07/2022 | 22/12/2022 | No | No |
Protocol file | version 2.0 | 12/04/2023 | 03/05/2023 | No | No |
HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No |
Additional files
Editorial Notes
04/09/2023: The following changes were made:
1. The public contact was changed.
2. Medway NHS Foundation Trust was added as a study participating centre.
22/06/2023: The study participating centre 'Heartlands Hospital' was added.
03/05/2023: Uploaded protocol (not peer reviewed)
24/02/2023: The following changes have been made:
1. Ethics approval added.
2. The participant exclusion criteria have been changed.
3. The recruitment start date has been changed from 01/11/2022 to 25/01/2023.
22/12/2022: The following changes have been made:
1. Uploaded protocol (not peer reviewed)
2. The public contact has been changed and the plain English summary updated accordingly.
29/09/2022: The recruitment start date was changed from 01/09/2022 to 01/11/2022.
05/09/2022: Internal review.
04/08/2022: Trial’s existence confirmed by the National Institute for Health and Care Research.