Investigating the effect of bilateral quadriceps NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on exercise capacity in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ISRCTN ISRCTN15985261
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15985261
Protocol serial number 12017
Sponsor King College Hospital (UK)
Funder National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (UK) - Doctoral Research Fellowship
Submission date
31/05/2012
Registration date
31/05/2012
Last edited
01/12/2016
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often experience a reduced ability to exercise, which affects their independence and quality of life. Several factors contribute to this including leg muscle weakness. Exercise can help but even simple forms, e.g. walking, can be difficult when out of breath. An alternative is neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) which uses a small battery-operated stimulator and pads placed over each thigh to produce a comfortable contraction and relaxation of the underlying muscles. Several small studies have found 4−6 week programmes to benefit patients but larger studies are required to confirm these findings.

Who can participate?
People diagnosed with COPD, attending clinics at the Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust may be invited to take part by their usual clinical team.

What does the study involve?
In this study 52 people with severe COPD will be allocated to receive either active or ‘sham’ (dummy) NMES to the thigh muscles. Both programmes will consist of 30 minutes of daily stimulation for 6 weeks, but the level will be set to either allow muscle contraction (active) or provide sensation only (dummy). Before and after the programme participants’ ability to exercise, thigh muscle strength and size, physical activity level and quality of life will be assessed.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
We hope that using NMES will help keep participants leg muscles strong and the information we get from this study should help us provide better care for people with COPD and will help confirm if NMES can benefit people with COPD unable to complete traditional forms of exercise. If successful, this may help this group maintain their independence for longer. It is however possible some participants will not gain any benefits from using NMES. NMES has been used in a wide range of medical conditions and there should be no serious side effects. People sometimes feel slight muscle soreness after first using NMES because it is a form of exercise, but this generally settles after a day or two.

Where is the study run from?
The study will run from Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.

When is study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study start in June 2012 and run approximately two years.

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Matthew Maddocks
matthew.maddocks@kcl.ac.uk

Contact information

Dr Matthew Maddocks
Scientific

Cicely Saunders Institute
Bessemer Road
Denmark Hill
London
SE5 9PJ
United Kingdom

Phone +44 207 848 5242
Email matthew.maddocks@kcl.ac.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
Study designRandomised; Interventional; Design type: Treatment
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study type Participant information sheet
Scientific titleA randomised placebo-controlled trial investigating the effect of bilateral quadriceps NeuroMuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on exercise capacity in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Study acronymNMES
Study objectivesPeople with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often experience a reduced ability to exercise, which affects their independence and quality of life. Several factors contribute to this including leg muscle weakness.

Exercise can help but even simple forms, e.g. walking, can be difficult when out of breath. An alternative is neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) which uses a small battery-operated stimulator and pads placed over each thigh to produce a comfortable contraction and relaxation of the underlying muscles. Several small studies have found 4-6 week programmes to benefit patients but larger studies are required to confirm these findings.

Fifty-two people with severe COPD will be allocated to receive either active or ‘sham’ NMES to the thigh muscles. Both programmes will consist of 30 minutes of daily stimulation for 6 weeks, but the level will be set to either allow muscle contraction (active) or provide sensation only (placebo). Before and after the programme participants’ ability to exercise, thigh muscle strength and size, physical activity level and quality of life will be assessed. Findings will confirm if NMES can benefit people with COPD unable to complete traditional forms of exercise. If successful, this may help this group maintain their independence for longer.
Ethics approval(s)London –Camberwell St Giles NRES Committee, ref:12/LO/0263
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedChronic obstructive pulmonary disease
InterventionActive, NMES to the quadriceps for 30min daily for 6 weeks (frequency 50Hz, pulse width 350µs, duty cycle 11-50%, amplitude 0-120mA over 1000O). The proportion of the treatment duration which is active, i.e. the stimulation phase of the duty cycle, will increase on a weekly basis from 11% to 25% to 50%, remaining constant thereafter.

Control, Placebo NMES to the quadriceps for 30min daily for 6 weeks using levels of stimulation detectable by the patient but not able to elicit a tetanic muscle contraction (frequency 50Hz, pulse width 350µs, duty cycle 11-50%, amplitude 0-20mA).
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measure(s)

Six-minute walk test (6MWT) at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Quadriceps function and size; assessed by quadriceps maximum voluntary contraction and twitch with femoral nerve stimulation, time for twitch to decline to 70% of maximum with repetitive transcutaneous stimulation, rectus femoris cross sectional area with ultrasonography and fat free mass by bioimpedence (kg).
2. Exercise capacity: assessed by 6MWT distance (m) at 12 weeks
3. Physical activity level: mean daily step count, up/down transitions and time spent upright
4. Health-related quality of life; overall health on EQ5D visual analogue scale (0−100), St Georges
5. Respiratory Questionnaire and Chronic Respiratoary Disease Questionnaire
6. Service utilisation; formal and informal care 12 weeks assessed by Client Service Reciept Inventory
7. Patients' experiences: semi-structured interviews in a sub-group of patients at 6 weeks

Completion date17/05/2014

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration52
Key inclusion criteria1. >=18 years of age
2. Diagnosis of COPD [ forced expiratory volume in the first one second to the forced vital capacity of the lungs (FEV1: FVC ratio <=70%)]
3. Severe respiratory impairment (GOLD stage III/IV; FEV1 <=50% predicted)
4. Incapacitating breathlessness (MRC dyspnoea score 4/5)
5. Able to provide written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria1. Cardiac pacemaker
2. Co-existing neurological condition
3. Change in medication or exacerbation requiring admission in preceding 4 weeks
4. Recent systemic corticosteroids (>=5 consecutive days in last 4 weeks)
5. Current regular exerciser (structured training >=3 times/week within last month)
6. Adults unable to consent for themselves
Date of first enrolment17/05/2012
Date of final enrolment17/05/2014

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

Cicely Saunders Institute
London
SE5 9PJ
United Kingdom

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Results article results 01/01/2016 Yes No
Participant information sheet Participant information sheet 11/11/2025 11/11/2025 No Yes

Editorial Notes

01/12/2016: Publication reference added.