Intervention to reduce stressful emotions in children scheduled to undergo surgery

ISRCTN ISRCTN16198907
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16198907
Secondary identifying numbers 456
Submission date
29/12/2022
Registration date
30/01/2023
Last edited
30/01/2023
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Children who undergo surgical and endoscopic procedures display high levels of stress, and various means are applied to reduce anxiety. Salivary cortisol is often used as a valid biomarker of stress. The aim of this study is to determine whether the application of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as an intervention to parents could ultimately reduce stress levels in children who undergo surgical or endoscopic procedures, as measured through salivary cortisol levels, and whether parents would be willing to allow their children to participate in the diagnostic procedure of saliva collection.

Who can participate?
Children scheduled to undergo surgical and endoscopic procedures and their parents

What does the study involve?
Participants were divided into two groups: Explained and Unexplained. The Explained Group comprised children and one of their parents who, after completion of the questionnaire, were provided with information concerning the entire procedure. After this training, parents communicated the given information to their children. The second, the Unexplained Group, included children and one of their parents who after completing the questionnaire received no explanation related to the surgical or endoscopic procedure. Three saliva samples were collected during the following hours: 7:00 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. in the clinic room; 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 a.m. just before anesthesia administration; and 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Providing proper education and information for parents may have a positive effect on reducing children’s stress levels. Changing parental attitudes towards saliva collection plays the most important role, since a positive attitude can influence intention and ultimately participation in these procedures.

Where is the study run from?
University General Hospital Attikon (Greece)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2020 to January 2022

Who is funding the study?
Investigator initiated and funded

Who is the main contact?
Nikolaos Zavras, nzavras@med.uoa.gr

Contact information

Prof Nikolaos Zavras
Principal Investigator

1 Rimini str
Haidari
12462
Greece

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-2546-4533
Phone +30 (0)2105832373
Email nzavras@med.uoa.gr

Study information

Study designProspective observational case-control study
Primary study designObservational
Secondary study designCase-control study
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeQuality of life
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleThe planned behavioral theory as an interventional tool to reduce stress in children undergoing surgical and endoscopic procedures as proved by salivary cortisol
Study acronymPBT
Study objectivesTo investigate the Planned Behavioral Theory as a tool to reduce stress levels in children who are undergoing surgical or endoscopic procedures, as measured through salivary cortisol levels, and whether parents would be willing to allow their children to participate in the diagnostic procedure of saliva collection
Ethics approval(s)Approved 18/02/2020, Scientific Board of the Attiko University General Hospital (1 Rimini Str, Haidari, Athens, 12462, Greece; +30 (0)2105831000; politis@attikonhospital.gr), ref: ΕΒΔ753/12-12-2019
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedStress reduction
InterventionConsecutive children scheduled to undergo a surgical operation or endoscopy (gastroscopy or coloscopy, or both) were recruited. The patients were divided into two groups: Explained and Unexplained. The Explained Group comprised children and one of their parents who, after completion of the questionnaire, were provided with information concerning the entire procedure. After this training, parents communicated the given information to their children. The second, the Unexplained Group, included children and one of their parents who after completing the questionnaire received no explanation related to the surgical or endoscopic procedure.

Three saliva samples were collected during the following hours: 7:00 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. in the clinic room; 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 a.m. just before anesthesia administration; and 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.
Intervention typeBehavioural
Primary outcome measureSalivary cortisol concentration in children measured using commercially available kits. Three saliva samples were collected during the following hours: 7:00 a.m. – 9:00 a.m. in the clinic room; 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 a.m. just before anesthesia administration; and 5:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.
Secondary outcome measuresParental intention measured at 7.00-9.00 am (on admission) using 18 items divided into the following sub-scales:
1. Intention: the assessment of parental intention towards saliva collection included three items based on a seven-point Likert scale, with 1 as unlikely and 7 likely. Higher mean scores indicated parental intention
2. Attitude: this subscale concerns parental attitudes towards saliva collection with eight items, four of which focus on salivary biomarkers, and four on whether saliva sampling affects general health. All items were based on a seven-point Likert scale. 1: unpleasant/stressful. ...7: pleasant/significant
3. Subjective norms: included items regarding parental perception of subjective norms, which regard agreement or disagreement with the advice and prescriptive norms about saliva collection
4. Perceived behavioural control: Three items assessed parental perception regarding their ability to control saliva collection. More specifically, they evaluated perceived behavioural control as self-efficacy assessing the extent that adults perceive themselves as capable of showing behaviour, as graded on a seven-point Likert scale, of how at ease they felt regarding their children's participation in the collection of saliva. The answers ranged from 1: extremely difficult to 7: extremely high sense of control
Overall study start date01/01/2020
Completion date01/01/2022

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupChild
SexBoth
Target number of participants60
Total final enrolment60
Key inclusion criteria1. Children scheduled to undergo surgical and endoscopic procedures and their parents
2. Ability to understand and participate in the research procedures
Key exclusion criteria1. Children with a history of previous surgery or endoscopy, liver, renal, cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and psychological diseases
2. Children who received steroids
Date of first enrolment01/03/2020
Date of final enrolment01/01/2022

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Greece

Study participating centre

University General Hospital Attikon
1 Rimini Str
Haidari
12462
Greece

Sponsor information

University General Hospital Attikon
Hospital/treatment centre

1 Rimini str
Athens
12462
Greece

Phone +30 (0)2105831000
Email politis@attikonhospital.gr
Website http://www.attikonhospital.gr/index.php
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03gb7n667

Funders

Funder type

Other

Investigator initiated and funded

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date28/03/2023
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Zavras Nikolaos (nzavras@med.uoa.gr).
Type of data: all data gathered during the processes of the study
Dates of availability: Data will be available upon request within a reasonable timeframe
Consent was obtained from all participants
No ethical or legal restrictions arose

Editorial Notes

23/01/2023: Trial's existence confirmed by the Scientific Board of the Attiko University General Hospital.