Assessing full pulpotomy in permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis using three calcium silicate cements
ISRCTN | ISRCTN16268487 |
---|---|
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16268487 |
Secondary identifying numbers | UDDS-94-04012021/SRC-226 |
- Submission date
- 15/03/2025
- Registration date
- 17/03/2025
- Last edited
- 17/03/2025
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Oral Health
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP) is a painful condition where the inflamed pulp tissue in a tooth cannot heal and requires root canal treatment or extraction. Pulpotomy is a simple treatment which is less invasive than root canal treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the response of mandibular (jaw) mature premolars with SIP following cervical pulpotomy using three bioactive materials: Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), Biodentine, and Bioceramic Putty.
Who can participate?
Patients aged between 15 and 20 years with a mandibular premolar with SIP
What does the study involve?
Participants were randomly divided into three groups to be treated with MTA pulpotomy, Biodentine pulpotomy, or Bioceramic Putty pulpotomy. All the teeth will be evaluated clinically and radiographically for up to 1 year.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The possible benefit of this study is to eliminate SIP without a full root canal treatment. Possible risks are flare-ups and post-operative pain.
Where is the study run from?
Hama University (Syria)
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2013 to August 2024
Who is funding the study?
Damascus University (Syria)
Who is the main contact?
Dr Yasser Alsayed Tolibah, yasser94.tolibah@damascusuniversity.edu.sy or Yasseralsayedtolibah@gmail.com
Contact information
Public, Scientific, Principal Investigator
Almazzeh Street
Damascus
20872
Syria
0000-0001-5498-9991 | |
Phone | +963 (0)988812044 |
yasseralsayedtolibah@gmail.com |
Public, Scientific, Principal Investigator
Almazzeh Street
Damascus
20872
Czech Republic
Phone | +963 (0)933092075 |
---|---|
Sarahnassri@gmail.com |
Study information
Study design | Single-center interventional double-blinded randomized controlled clinical, radiographical and histological trial |
---|---|
Primary study design | Interventional |
Secondary study design | Randomised parallel trial |
Study setting(s) | University/medical school/dental school |
Study type | Treatment |
Participant information sheet | Patient information sheet in Arabic: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ptqv89urfc17q0p19mqc5/Sara-clinical.pdf?rlkey=yogzn6qjli2nrkuldliqvrpbj&st=cowod1zx&dl=0 |
Scientific title | Evaluation of vital full pulpotomy techniques in permanent mature teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis using three calcium silicate cements |
Study objectives | The first null hypothesis suggests no differences between the bioactive materials in the two-time intervals regarding the histological evaluations. At the same time, the second null hypothesis indicates that similar results will be found in the two-time intervals among the groups. |
Ethics approval(s) |
Approved 04/01/2021, Hama University (Hama, Hama, C2987, Syria; +963 (0)33 222 3790; dentist@hama-univ.edu.sy), ref: 286 |
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Irreversible pulpotomy treatment |
Intervention | Patients were assured that their medical care would not be affected should they choose not to participate. Documentation explicitly noted that the treated premolars would be extracted after the agreed-upon observation period to fulfill ethical standards. Patients rinsed with a 2% chlorhexidine mouthwash prior to local anesthesia administration using one carpule of 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) (Huons Lidocaine HCL, Seoul, Korea), delivered via mandibular block anaesthesia and another carpule of 1.8 ml of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) in buccal infiltration to achieve sufficient anesthesia. Rubber dam isolation (Sanctuary, Perak, Malaysia) was applied, and the premolar surface was disinfected with a 5.25% sodium hypochlorite-soaked gauze for 5 minutes. Initial cavity preparation was performed using a high-speed handpiece with sterile diamond burs, followed by caries excavation with slow-speed rotary instruments under copious water irrigation to remove dentin from the cavity walls without disturbing the pulpal floor. Cavity refinement was completed by finishing enamel margins and slowly removing carious dentin from the pulpal floor to prevent pushing necrotic debris into the pulp exposure site. From the pulp exposure point, sterile Endo-Z burs (Dentsply Maillefer, Tusla, Oklahoma, USA) were used to remove the chamber roof, followed by sterile curettes to amputate the coronal pulp until canal orifice exposure without damaging the pulp tissue. The conservative access cavity was irrigated with saline to verify the fresh bleeding from exposed pulp tissue and bleeding cessation within 10 minutes, achieved by continuous saline irrigation and application of a 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) soaked cotton pellet. If haemostasis was not achieved, or if the exposed pulp tissue lacked bleeding, the tooth was excluded from the study and extracted directly to complete the orthodontic treatment. Following haemostasis, the amputation site was covered with one of the study materials MTA (White ProRoot MTA, Dentsply, Tulsa, OK, USA), Biodentine (Septodont, St Maur-des-Fossés, France), and BiCeramic putty (TotalFill® BC RRM™, FKG Dentaire, Le Crêt-du-Locle, Switzerland) according to the randomization process, following the manufacturer’s instructions, ensuring uniform coverage (3 mm thick) without excessive pressure. A thin layer of glass ionomer cement (Medifil; Promedica Dental Material GmbH, Neumunster, Germany) was applied to avoid interference with the material setting, followed by composite resin restoration Tetric N Ceram; Lichtenstein, Ivoclar Vivadent, Leicester, United Kingdom in the same session. |
Intervention type | Other |
Primary outcome measure | 1. Clinical evaluation: Patients of both groups will be recalled after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days of treatment and during radiographical assessment periods (3, 6 and 12 months), where they will be asked to rate their pain on the Wong-Baker Faces Scale, where children will set their pain levels by choosing a face; 0 = no hurt, 1 = hurts a little bit, 2 = hurts a little more 3 = hurts even more, 4 = hurts a whole lot, and 5 = hurts worst. Moreover, the presence of fistula, swelling, and movement will be recorded. 2. Radiographical assessment: after coronal restoration is completed a control x-ray will be taken. The periapical status will be assessed at the time of obturation-restoration, 3, 6, and 12 months following endodontic treatment. The outcome will be determined according to the Periapical Index scoring system: 1 = normal periapical structures; 2 = small changes in bone structure; 3 = changes in bone structure with some mineral loss; 4 = periodontitis with well-defined radiolucent area; 5 = severe periodontitis with exacerbating features. The teeth will be evaluated according to healed, healing or unsuccessful as a primary radiographical outcome. |
Secondary outcome measures | Histological evaluations at 1 week and 6 months: 1. Pulp inflammation was assessed based on inflammatory cell presence and graded as: 1 = No inflammation, 2= Mild inflammation (few inflammatory cells), 3 = Moderate inflammation, and 4 = Severe inflammation (dense inflammatory infiltrate). 2. Pulpal tissue disorganization was evaluated as: 1 = Normal pulp morphology, 2 = Slight superficial imbalance with a central intact pulp, 3 = Moderate imbalance extending beyond superficial layers, 4 = Severe imbalance with diffuse degeneration, and Complete pulp necrosis. 3. Dentinal bridge formation was assessed and classified as: 1 = No evidence of formation, 2= Initial formation, 3 = Incomplete or defective bridge, and 4 = Complete bridge without defects. |
Overall study start date | 15/12/2013 |
Completion date | 20/08/2024 |
Eligibility
Participant type(s) | Patient |
---|---|
Age group | Mixed |
Lower age limit | 15 Years |
Upper age limit | 20 Years |
Sex | Both |
Target number of participants | 40 |
Total final enrolment | 40 |
Key inclusion criteria | Radiographic Criteria: 1. Fully developed first or second permanent mandibular premolars with deep carious lesions 2. A relatively normal-sized pulp chamber without degenerative changes (e.g., pulp stones, diffuse calcifications, or significant chamber narrowing) 3. No periapical or furcal radiolucency 4. No internal or pathological external resorption 5. No signs of periodontal involvement, such as alveolar bone resorption Clinical Criteria: 1. Symptoms and clinical signs indicate symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, characterized by spontaneous, intermittent, sharp pain or prolonged pain after stimulus removal 2. The tooth is restorable without requiring a crown, post, or core-supported restoration 3. No periodontal disease; the gingival sulcus depth ranges from 1–3 mm from the free gingival margin to the epithelial attachment 4. No periodontal involvement, with tooth mobility within normal limits |
Key exclusion criteria | 1. Patients with immune, bleeding disorders, systemic conditions affecting bleeding and clotting time, or those taking medications that alter metabolism 2. Immature premolars with open apices 3. Non-restorable teeth or those with periodontal disease 4. Severely narrowed pulp chambers or significant calcifications within the root canal system (e.g., pulp stones, diffuse calcifications) 5. Presence of periapical or furcal radiolucency 6. Internal or pathological external resorption 7. Signs of pulp necrosis, including negative responses to vitality tests, swelling, sinus tract, or positive percussion and palpation tests 8. Uncontrolled bleeding after pulpotomy for more than 10 minutes or abnormal pulp tissue appearance 9. Absence of bleeding or minimal dark red bleeding after pulp exposure or pulpotomy |
Date of first enrolment | 01/02/2021 |
Date of final enrolment | 12/12/2023 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- Algeria
- Syria
Study participating centre
Damascus
20872
Syria
Sponsor information
University/education
Almazzeh Street
Damascus
20872
Syria
Phone | +963 (0)944372202 |
---|---|
sdg@damascusuniversity.edu.sy | |
Website | http://www.damascusuniversity.edu.sy |
https://ror.org/03m098d13 |
Funders
Funder type
University/education
Government organisation / Universities (academic only)
- Alternative name(s)
- University of Damascus, جَامِعَةُ دِمَشْقَ, DU
- Location
- Syria
Results and Publications
Intention to publish date | |
---|---|
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | Yes |
IPD sharing plan summary | Published as a supplement to the results publication |
Publication and dissemination plan | Planned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal |
IPD sharing plan | The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study during this study will be included in the subsequent results publication. |
Editorial Notes
17/03/2025: Study's existence confirmed by Hama University.