The Fourth Multicentre Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST-4) - a randomised clinical randomised effectiveness study comparing early video assisted thoracic surgery and early intrapleural enzyme therapy in adult patients with pleural infection

ISRCTN ISRCTN16328099
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16328099
Integrated Research Application System (IRAS) 1012038
Sponsor's protocol code number 19390
Sponsor Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit
Funder National Institute for Health and Care Research
Submission date
08/01/2026
Registration date
27/02/2026
Last edited
27/02/2026
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Respiratory
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Pleural infection is a severe complication of pneumonia, where infected fluid collects around the lungs. Around 40 new cases are diagnosed daily in the UK, increasingly among the elderly. Standard treatment includes antibiotics, chest tube drainage under local anaesthetic, and a hospital stay of approximately 2 weeks. However, 20% of patients either die within a year or require surgery when initial treatment fails. Surgery, while effective, carries significant risks, particularly for older or frail patients where mortality can reach 35%.
Two less invasive treatment options are now available: Intrapleural Enzyme Therapy (IET), which enhances fluid drainage via the chest tube, and Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS), a keyhole surgical approach. Both have shown promise, but their comparative effectiveness has never been tested in a large, direct trial. Currently, choice of treatment varies by hospital and clinician. Evidence suggests that delays in administering effective therapy result in poorer outcomes, including death and prolonged hospitalisation.
A prior feasibility study showed that patients were willing to be randomised to either IET or VATS and that both treatments could be delivered promptly. Patients in that study identified reducing death, repeat procedures, and hospital stay as top priorities.
We now plan a definitive randomised trial to compare early IET versus early VATS in 604 patients across UK hospitals.

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 years and over with pleural infection

What does the study involve?
Participants will be randomly allocated to either treatment. The primary outcome will be the need for further treatment—a key concern for patients.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
The main risk of taking part is unexpected side effects from one of the drugs (IET) or a surgical complication (VATS) described in detail below. Both these treatments are already used in the NHS for patients, and so we know a lot about their complications and how to deal with them.
Participants will be monitored closely for any such problems, and if they occur, they will be promptly treated by the team of nurses and doctors looking after them and the study team will be notified. If any unforeseen complications are felt to be a result of the medications given through the chest tube, they will be stopped immediately.

Where is the study run from?
Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit (UK)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2026 to October 2029

Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (UK)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Najib Rahman, najib.rahman@ndm.ox.ac.uk

Contact information

Dr Najib Rahman
Principal investigator

ORTU, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington
Oxford
OX3 7LE
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 282952
Email najib.rahman@ndm.ox.ac.uk
Dr Eihab Bedawi
Scientific

ORTU, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington
Oxford
OX3 7LE
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 282952
Email eihab.bedawi@ndm.ox.ac.uk
Dr Jessica Maguire
Public

ORTU, CCTVM, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Headington
Oxford
OX3 7LE
United Kingdom

Phone +44 (0)1865 282952
Email mist4@ndm.ox.ac.uk

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationRandomized controlled trial
MaskingOpen (masking not used)
ControlActive
AssignmentSingle
PurposeTreatment
Scientific titleThe Fourth Multicentre Intrapleural Sepsis Trial (MIST-4) - a randomised clinical randomised effectiveness study comparing early video assisted thoracic surgery and early intrapleural enzyme therapy in adult patients with pleural infection
Study acronymMIST4
Study objectivesPrimary objectives:
To compare treatment failure of initial randomised intervention (either VATS or IET) over 90 days post randomisation

Secondary objectives:
1. To compare health-related quality of life between randomised groups
2. To compare total length of hospital stay between randomised groups
3. To compare total duration of antibiotics between randomised groups
4. To compare time to intervention between randomised groups
5. To compare complication burden between randomised groups
6. To compare recovery and independence between randomised groups
7. To compare the percentage of patients with adverse events between groups
8. To compare the percentage of deaths between randomised groups
9. To compare average patient reported– pain / breathlessness between randomised groups
10. To compare lung function between randomised groups
11. Radiological improvement compared to baseline between randomised groups
12. Cost effectiveness of IET compared to surgery
Ethics approval(s)

Not yet submitted

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPleural infection
InterventionRandomisation to one of two arms in a 1:1 ratio, utilising sealed envelope randomisation software:
1. Intrapleural Enzyme Therapy (or IET) – this involves giving six doses of IET therapy (DNase and alteplase) through a chest tube.
2. Keyhole surgery to drain infected fluid – known as Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS).

Both treatments are established and used routinely in hospitals every day; follow-up activity for both arms will follow standard of care.
Intervention typeDrug
PhasePhase IV
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Alteplase, dornase alfa
Primary outcome measure(s)

Treatment failure of initial randomised intervention (either VATS or IET) over 90 days post randomisation. Treatment failure is any of the following:
1. Any further pleural intervention required after initial intended treatment:
1.1. Further chest tube insertion
1.2. Surgical intervention (further VATS debridement, thoracotomy, thoracostomy)
1.3. Any additional intrapleural therapy including IET (any dose in the VATS group, and further doses beyond 6 doses in the IET group) and saline irrigation
2. Death (all cause)
3. Re-admission post discharge for pleural infection related events
4. Re-escalation of antibiotics from oral to intravenous or re-initiation of antibiotic treatment once initial treatment course completed

Key secondary outcome measure(s)

1. Quality of life measured using EQ-5D-5L +bolt ons at baseline, 2 weeks and 90 days
2. Length of hospital stay - randomisation to 90 days – including re-admission in relation to the initial in-patient episode at 90 days
3. Total days of antibiotics at 90 days, measured using patients’ medical records
4. Days to intervention (IET/surgical treatment) from randomisation, measured using patients’ medical records
5. Complications measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) at 30 days
6. Days at Home up to 30 days after randomisation (DAH-30) measured using patients’ medical records
7. Adverse events(AEs) by average number of AEs and percentage of participants with at least one AE (assessed from intervention) at 90 days
8. Death (all cause) at 12 months measured using patients’ medical records
9. Pain measured using validated 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, Day 1 post trial intervention, discharge, weekly post randomisation from 2 weeks and 90 days
10. Spirometry (FEV1% predicted) at 2 weeks post randomisation and 90 days
11. Objective measurement of pleural shadowing on chest x-ray (CXR) or CT at baseline, 2 weeks and 90 days
12. Cost by incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained at baseline to 90 days, measured using patients’ medical records

Completion date31/10/2029

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit100 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration604
Key inclusion criteriaAll patients will initially be treated with chest drain insertion for up to 24 hours, and only those with residual pleural collections will be randomised (MIST-3 demonstrated that with an identical recruitment strategy, 15% of patients required no further treatment), hence this will enrich the population for those who stand to benefit most from intervention. Pleural infection will be diagnosed on BTS guideline criteria.

1. Aged 18 years or above.
2. Clinical presentation compatible with pleural infection plus, pleural fluid requiring drainage which is:
2.1. Purulent OR
2.2. Culture positive OR
2.3. Acidic (pH <7.2) OR*
2.4. Pleural contrast enhancement on CT or septation on ultrasound
3. Fail initial (12 to 24 hours) drainage treatment, defined as clinically significant residual pleural collection on chest imaging (chest radiograph, ultrasound, or CT)
4. Clinical Frailty Score ≤6**
5. Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.

*In the absence of pleural fluid pH measurement access or concern over accuracy – a PF LDH >1000, glucose <2.0mmol/L may be adequate alternatives particularly in the presence of other radiological features such as septations on thoracic ultrasound or pleural contrast enhancement on CT (if done).

** Patients will be included if they are potentially fit for surgical intervention, using deliberately broad criteria to minimise selection bias. Only those who are clearly unfit for surgery (pre-morbid Clinical Frailty Scale >6) will be excluded. Patients with significant comorbidities (e.g., renal or cardiac failure) will remain eligible. Participants randomised to surgery who are later deemed unfit will still be analysed in the intention-to-treat population, consistent with the previous feasibility trial.
Key exclusion criteria1. Has previously received an intrapleural fibrinolytic and/or DNase for this episode of pleural infection
2. Has previously received large volume saline flushes akin to irrigation for this episode of pleural infection*
3. Has a known sensitivity to tPA or DNase.
4. Has had a previous pneumonectomy on the side of the infection.
5. Coincidental major bleed within the last 7 days.
6. Clinically significant renal or hepatic impairment in the view of the recruiting clinician e.g. CKD 5 on dialysis or advanced cirrhosis.
7. Participant with life expectancy of less than 3 months due to other disease (for example, known malignancy with poor prognosis).
8. Female participant of childbearing age who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the trial.
9. Scheduled elective surgery (i.e. not for this episode of pleural infection) or other procedures requiring general anaesthesia within 30 days of prospective enrolment.
10. Significant irreversible coagulopathy that in the local investigator's opinion would prevent the participant from safely receiving IET.
11. Participation in another interventional clinical trial for pleural infection.
* Standard intrapleural saline flush regimens to maintain tube patency (e.g. 20 ml qds / 30 ml tds) are permitted
Date of first enrolment01/04/2026
Date of final enrolment01/07/2028

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • United Kingdom
  • England

Study participating centre

-
-
-
-
England

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryData sharing statement to be made available at a later date
IPD sharing plan

Editorial Notes

27/02/2026: ISRCTN received notification of combined HRA/MHRA approval for this trial on 27/02/2026.
08/01/2026: Study's existence confirmed by the HRA.