Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered mealtime insulin dose-assisted decision-making system

ISRCTN ISRCTN16784568
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16784568
Secondary identifying numbers Chictr.org number: ChiCTR2200055328
Submission date
25/07/2023
Registration date
09/08/2023
Last edited
08/08/2023
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Proper dosage titration is still the most effective way to mitigate intra- and inter-subject variations in insulin requirements and thus achieve euglycemic control in insulin therapy. Although the use of an artificial pancreas system for real-time basal rate adjustment has been extensively studied, the feasibility of automatic real-time meal bolus decisions with an intelligent closed-loop control algorithm is yet to be explored. We propose using an artificial-pancreas-like algorithm (AP-A) which could automatically determine the appropriate pre-prandial insulin dose based on intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) data trajectories in multiple-dose injection (MDI) therapy. The study aims to determine whether pre-prandial insulin dose adjustments guided by the AP-A under the supervision of physicians are as effective and safe as those guided by physicians alone.

Who can participate?
Type 2 diabetes patients aged over 18 years old

What does the study involve?
In this study, the participants wear an isCGM and insulin dosage is determined by either physician alone or AP-A recommendation before physician approvement.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Since the AP-A recommended dose will be reviewed and approved by physician, the benefits and risks are no more than standard care.

Where is the study run from?
Peking University People's Hospital (China)

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
December 2019 to July 2022

Who is funding the study?
Peking University People's Hospital Innovation Fund (China)

Who is the main contact?
Dr Wei Liu, liuwei03@bjmu.edu.cn

Contact information

Dr Wei Liu
Principal Investigator

Peking University People's Hospital
Xizhimennan Rd #11
Beijing
100044
China

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0002-7613-3163
Phone +86-10-88324105
Email liuwei03@bjmu.edu.cn
Dr Wei Liu
Scientific

Xizhimennan Rd #11
Beijing
100044
China

Phone +86-10-88324105
Email liuwei03@bjmu.edu.cn
Dr Wei Liu
Public

Xizhimennan Rd #11
Beijing
100044
China

Phone +86-10-88324105
Email liuwei03@bjmu.edu.cn

Study information

Study designSingle-blind parallel (two-arm) randomized controlled prospective non-inferiority trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleResearch on the adjustment scheme of insulin injection dose based on artificial intelligence
Study objectivesTo verify the effectiveness and safety of an artificial intelligence algorithm that assists in guiding mealtime insulin doses.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 15/01/2021, Ethics Review Committee of Peking University People's Hospital (Xizhimennan Rd #11, Beijing, 100044, China; +86-10-88324516; rmyyllwyh@163.com), ref: 2020PHB338-01

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedType 2 diabetes
InterventionMeal insulin dose adjustment by AI-assisted
The study proposes an artificial pancreas-like algorithm (AP-A) that automatically determines the appropriate pre-prandial insulin dose based on intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) data trajectories in multiple-dose injection (MDI) therapy. The aim is to determine whether adjusting pre-prandial insulin doses guided by the AP-A under the supervision of physicians is as effective and safe as those guided by physicians alone. The study is taking place in a hospital setting, and participants are wearing isCGM (Freestyle Libre H, Abbott, US) devices after randomization to either the AP-A or physician arm. Randomization is stratified by age and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at screening using a computer-generated random sequence and random block size.

In the AP-A arm, isCGM data are being collected before meals and uploaded into the proposed closed-loop meal-bolus decision algorithm, which automatically outputs suggested insulin dosages. The physician reviews the suggested dosage and chooses whether to adopt it or override the recommended dosage. In the control arm, certified endocrinologists determine insulin dosage adjustments based on current clinical strategies using isCGM readings. Meal-time insulin consists of insulin lispro (Humalog®, Lilly, USA.), while basal insulin is glargine U100 (Lantus®, Sanofi, US.).

Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measureGlucose in target range time measured using isCGM for glucose level during the insulin titration period (depending on how long the participants need multiple daily injections therapy)
Secondary outcome measures1. Serum glycated albumin level measured using a standard laboratory test 14 days after enrollment, last visit
2. The proportion of glucose data <3.9mmol/L measured using isCGM during insulin titration
3. The proportion of glucose data <2.8mmol/L measured using isCGM during insulin titration
4. The proportion of glucose data >10.0mmol/L measured using isCGM during insulin titration
5. The proportion of glucose data >13.3mmol/L measured using isCGM during insulin titration
6. The area under the curve of glucose <10.0mmol/L in the AGP map measured using isCGM during insulin titration
7. The area under the curve of glucose <3.9mmol/L in the AGP map measured using isCGM during insulin titration
8. Average glucose data measured using isCGM during insulin titration
9. The standard deviation of glucose data measured using isCGM during insulin titration
10. The difference between the dose approved by the doctor and the dose recommended by the algorithm measured using the insulin dosage record during the titration period
11. The number of times that the doctor recommended the dose in the experimental group is different from that recommended by the algorithm measured using the insulin dosage record during the titration period
12. In the experimental group, the proportion of blood glucose in the range of 3.9mmol/L to 10.0mmol/L within 4 hours after insulin injection when there was a difference between the doctor-approved dose and the algorithm-recommended dose measured using the insulin dosage record during the titration period
Overall study start date20/12/2019
Completion date30/07/2022

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants111
Key inclusion criteria1. Type 2 diabetic subjects receiving intensive insulin therapy
2. Aged >= 18 years old
3. Poor blood sugar control, HbA1c>=8.0%
Key exclusion criteria1. The subject is currently pregnant, intends to become pregnant, or is unwilling and unable to use contraception during the study (female only)
2. Abnormal mental state
3. Refuse to wear invasive examination equipment
4. There are clear reasons for not wearing dynamic glucose monitoring (severe allergies, skin diseases, etc.)
5. The subject has symptoms and signs such as skin lesions, scarring, redness, infection or edema at the sensor application site that will affect the sensor application or the accuracy of the interstitial fluid glucose measurement
6. Complicated serious diseases, including but not limited to heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, liver and kidney disease, severe diabetes-related complications
7. The subject has an appointment for X-ray, MRI or CT examination during the study period, and the appointment cannot be changed to before the start of the study or after the end of the study
8. Drugs that affect blood sugar such as glucocorticoids have been used within one month
9. Any other reasons judged by the investigator that would make the subject unsuitable to participate in the research
Date of first enrolment01/11/2021
Date of final enrolment20/07/2022

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • China

Study participating centre

Peking University People's Hospital
Xizhimennan Rd #11
Beijing
100044
China

Sponsor information

Peking University People's Hospital
Hospital/treatment centre

Xizhimennan Rd #11
Beijing
100044
China

Phone +84-10-88324371
Email rmyykyc@163.com
Website http://www.pkuph.cn/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/035adwg89

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Peking University People's Hospital Innovation Fund
Government organisation / National government
Alternative name(s)
北京大学人民医院, PKUPH
Location
China

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date30/08/2023
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from the corresponding author, Dr Wei Liu, liuwei03@bjmu.edu.cn. The type of data that will be shared is de-identified data. These data will be available after publication.

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol file 15/01/2021 04/08/2023 No No
Statistical Analysis Plan version 2.0 22/07/2022 04/08/2023 No No

Additional files

43999_Protocol_15Jan2021.pdf
43999_SAP_22July2022.pdf

Editorial Notes

04/08/2023: Trial's existence confirmed by the Ethical Review Committee of Peking University People's Hospital (China).