Can optimized postoperative pain management improve outcomes after an operation for oesophageal cancer (cancer of the gullet)?

ISRCTN ISRCTN16853684
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16853684
Sponsor Uppsala University
Funders Nordic Cancer Union, Cancerfonden
Submission date
28/01/2026
Registration date
29/01/2026
Last edited
30/01/2026
Recruitment status
Not yet recruiting
Overall study status
Ongoing
Condition category
Cancer
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
This study is designed to investigate the effects, if any, of different strategies for pain management on the recovery process after an operation for oesophageal cancer (cancer of the gullet).

Who can participate?
Patients aged 18 years and over planned for a minimally invasive (keyhole surgery) operation for oesophageal cancer

What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to have paravertebral local analgesia or standard postoperative epidural analgesia.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Both methods used in this trial are approved and we want to uncover differences, if any, in the recovery process. The risks are very small.

Where is the study run from?
This study is led from Uppsala University (Sweden) and also involves academic centers from Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Italy.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
September 2026 to July 2033

Who is funding the study?
1. Nordic Cancer Union
2. Swedish Cancer Society

Who is the main contact?
Dr Jakob Hedberg, jakob.hedberg@surgsci.uu.se

Contact information

Dr Jakob Hedberg
Principal investigator, Scientific

Akademiska Sjukhuset in 70
Uppsala
75185
Sweden

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0003-1308-4592
Phone +46 (0)186116507
Email jakob.hedberg@me.com
Ms Linnéa Pattersson
Public

Akademiska Sjukhuset in 70
Uppsala
75185
Sweden

Phone +46 (0)6119993
Email jakob.hedberg@surgsci.uu.se

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationRandomized controlled trial
MaskingOpen (masking not used)
ControlActive
AssignmentParallel
PurposeHealth services research, Treatment
Scientific titleParavertebral Block AnaLgesia vs. epidural: Assessing Novel Care in Esophagectomy (BALANCE): a multi-center randomized Phase III trial
Study acronymBALANCE
Study objectivesTo provide high-level evidence on the benefits/risks of epidural analgesia in minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Ethics approval(s)

Not yet submitted

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedOesophageal cancer
InterventionRandomisation:
Participants are enrolled and randomized consecutively as they are found to be eligible for inclusion in the trial. Randomization is performed no later than 12 h before surgery. If a participant discontinues participation, the participant's trial-specific code will not be reused, and the participant will not be allowed to re-enter the trial.
Randomization will be performed online from within an electronic randomization system, after a multidisciplinary tumor board meeting, once all eligibility criteria have been verified and no exclusion criteria have been fulfilled. Randomization will be stratified by country and level of anastomosis (chest/neck). The electronic randomization module is accessed from each participating site. Treatment allocation will be open-label, among the two intervention arms at a 1:1 ratio of paravertebral block and opioid PCA (intervention) or standard EDA treatment (control).

Intervention:
Participants who are randomized to intervention will receive a paravertebral block at the end of the thoracic phase of surgery. Local anesthetics injected under thoracoscopic vision in 1-4 sites in the intercostal space 3-8 according to local routines. As always, attention to not inject in vessels (aspiration) is crucial. Abdominal port sites are also injected according to local routines. Permitted drugs and combinations are: monotherapy, preferably bupivacaine 2.5 mg/ml (total volume 40-60 ml). Alternatively, ropivacain 3.75 mg/ml (total volume 40-60 ml) can be used. Dexamethasone or betamethasone IV 8 mg Klonidin 75-150 µg IV (optional per center but same in both arms). In addition, patient-controlled analgesia with opioids according to local protocols is used in this arm.

Control:
Participants who are randomized to control will receive routine EDA according to local routines at level Th6-10. After correct placement of the epidural catheter, a local anesthetic (ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, or bupivacaine) is used and according to in-house protocols, an opioid will be added to the epidural solution.

Follow up:
All primary and secondary outcomes will be recorded 30 days after surgery with the exception of survival which will be followed for 5 years.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Anastomotic leak measured using clinical evaluation, including CT with peroral contrast, at 30 days
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
  1. Postoperative pain measured using Numeric Rating Scale (1-10) and total postoperative opioid use (enteral and parenteral), at baseline and on days 1, 2, 3, 7 and 30 after surgery
  2. Risk of overall and procedure-specific complications measured using the Clavien-Dindo Classification at 30 days after surgery
  3. Hypotension measured using assessment of blood pressure at up to postoperative day 5
Completion date28/07/2033

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit90 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration550
Key inclusion criteriaAdult (≥18 years of age) patients undergoing minimally invasive oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction due to confirmed cancer (cT1 N+ or cT2-4a any N; M0-1)
Key exclusion criteria1. Epidural analgesia contraindicated, i.e., known uncontrollable hypersensitivity to the components of the chemotherapeutic agents used in the trial regimens
2. Use of anticoagulants precluding EDA use
3. No postoperative nasogastric tube
4. No ability to understand the study in terms of risk and benefits (including language difficulties)
5. The participant has any other severe acute or chronic medical or psychiatric condition or laboratory abnormality that would, in the judgment of the investigator, pose excess risk associated with study participation or that, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into the trial
Date of first enrolment01/09/2026
Date of final enrolment31/07/2028

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Denmark
  • Finland
  • Iceland
  • Italy
  • Norway
  • Sweden

Study participating centres

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot expected to be made available
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol file version 1 26/01/2027 30/01/2026 No No

Additional files

ISRCTN16853684_PROTOCOL_V1_26Jan2027.pdf
Protocol file

Editorial Notes

30/01/2026: Protocol uploaded.
29/01/2026: Study's existence confirmed by Nordic Cancer Union.