Corticosteroid injections in patients with trochanteric pain syndrome: open label randomized clinical trial in general practice

ISRCTN ISRCTN16994576
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16994576
Secondary identifying numbers NTR640
Submission date
28/04/2006
Registration date
28/04/2006
Last edited
12/09/2011
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr S. Bierma-Zeinstra
Scientific

Erasmus Medical Center
Department of General Practice
P.O. Box 1738
Rotterdam
3000 DR
Netherlands

Email s.bierma-zeinstra@erasmusmc.nl

Study information

Study designRandomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)GP practice
Study typeTreatment
Scientific title
Study acronymTIS (Trochanter Injection Study)
Study objectivesLocal corticosteroid injections combined with usual care will have a positive effect on experienced recovery and will reduce pain at 3 and 12 months follow up compared to usual care alone.
Ethics approval(s)Ethics approval received from the local medical ethics committee
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedTrochanteric pain (trochanteric bursitis, pseudotrochanteric bursitis)
Intervention1. Intervention group: Usual care combined with corticosteroid injections (triamcinolone acetate 40 mg, lidocaine 1%)

2. Control group: Usual care
Intervention typeDrug
Pharmaceutical study type(s)
PhaseNot Specified
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Triamcinolone acetate, lidocaine
Primary outcome measureExperienced recovery (7 points Likert scale) and severity of pain (0-10 visual analogue scale [VAS]) at 3 months follow up.
Secondary outcome measures1. Disease specific outcomes of pain and function (WOMAC/HOOS), at 3 and 12 months follow up
2. Primary outcomes at 6 weeks and at 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up
3. Cost-effectiveness over 12 months of follow-up. Costs will be estimated by medical consumption, and productivity loss (PRODISC).
Overall study start date01/05/2006
Completion date01/05/2007

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit80 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants150
Key inclusion criteriaPatients aged 18-80 consulting the general practitioner with trochanteric hip pain existing longer then one week, with the following signs:
1. Severe local pain by pressure at the trochanter major, but unsure whether the patient recognizes this as the pain he/she consulted for
2. Local pain by pressure at the trochanter major, which the patient recognizes as the pain he/she consulted for
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients who don’t understand the questionnaires because of inadequate mastering of Dutch language or cognitive disorders
2. Patients who presented themselves in the previous year to the GP with the same complaints
3. Patients with sensibility disorders due to meralgia paresthetica, patients who previously have undergone hip surgery at the same side and patients with systematic rheumatologic or neurologic disorders
Date of first enrolment01/05/2006
Date of final enrolment01/05/2007

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Netherlands

Study participating centre

Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam
3000 DR
Netherlands

Sponsor information

Erasmus Medical Center, Department of General Practice (The Netherlands)
University/education

P.O. Box 1738
Rotterdam
3000 DR
Netherlands

ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/018906e22

Funders

Funder type

Research organisation

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw)
Private sector organisation / Other non-profit organizations
Alternative name(s)
Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Location
Netherlands

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 19/09/2007 Yes No
Results article results 01/05/2011 Yes No