Treatment of fungal infection in the ear, a comparison of topical treatments (clotrimazole vs terbinafine)

ISRCTN ISRCTN17978168
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN17978168
Sponsor Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
Funder Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
Submission date
02/09/2026
Registration date
26/09/2026
Last edited
17/09/2026
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Ear, Nose and Throat
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Contact information

Dr Erika Celis-Aguilar
Public, Scientific, Principal investigator

Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa
Eustaquio Buelna 91 Col Burocrata Culiacan Sin
Culiacán
80107
Mexico

Phone +52 (0)6677587933
Email erika.celis@uas.edu.mx

Study information

Primary study designInterventional
AllocationRandomized controlled trial
MaskingBlinded (masking used)
ControlActive
AssignmentSequential
PurposeTreatment
Scientific titleEfficacy of topical terbinafine versus clotrimazole for the treatment of otomycosis: a randomized controlled trial
Study objectives The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of topical terbinafine versus topical clotrimazole 1% in patients with otomycosis.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 23/03/2022, Institutional Research Ethics Committee (CONBIOÉTICA-25-CEI-001-20180523) (Centro de Investigación y Docencia en Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Eustaquio Buelna 91, Col Burocrata Culiacan Sin, Culiacan, 80060, Mexico; +52 (0)6671023474; cei.cidocs.hc@uas.edu.mx), ref: 086

Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedOtomycosis
InterventionParticipants were allocated using computer-generated unrestricted simple randomization.

Before treatment initiation, all patients underwent meticulous microscopic debridement of the external auditory canal.

Participants assigned to the control group received topical 1% clotrimazole cream, whereas participants assigned to the intervention group received topical 1% terbinafine cream. In both groups, the medication was applied weekly until complete occlusion of the external auditory canal.

At the first follow-up visit, residual medication was removed, microscopic cleaning was repeated, and the same treatment was reapplied. Patients were followed weekly, the end of period follow up was 3 weeks.

Patients with persistent clinical evidence of otomycosis after completion of the assigned treatment follow up received rescue therapy with the alternative antifungal therapy, for example, patients in the clotrimazole arm received terbinafine and vice versa. 

All participants received standardized instructions to keep the affected ear dry and avoid recognized predisposing factors throughout the study period.
Intervention typeDrug
PhasePhase III
Drug / device / biological / vaccine name(s)Terbinafine, clotrimazole
Primary outcome measure(s)
  1. Resolution of otomycosis measured using microscopy at 1, 2 and 3 weeks
Key secondary outcome measure(s)
Completion date15/07/2026

Eligibility

Participant type(s)
Age groupMixed
Lower age limit18 Years
Upper age limit99 Years
SexAll
Target sample size at registration87
Total final enrolment82
Key inclusion criteria1. Adults aged 18 years or older of either sex
2. Clinical diagnosis of otomycosis established by medical history, otomicroscopic examination, and mycological evaluation
Key exclusion criteria1. Patients with concomitant otologic diseases other than otomycosis
2. Allergy to study medications
3. Pregnancy
4. Inability to complete follow-up
Date of first enrolment01/08/2022
Date of final enrolment01/09/2025

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Mexico

Study participating centres

Results and Publications

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo

Editorial Notes

17/09/2026: Study's existence confirmed by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee.