Comparing the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of an internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention with a waiting list control among adults with chronic pain

ISRCTN ISRCTN18166896
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN18166896
Secondary identifying numbers ICE/2011/19
Submission date
04/02/2014
Registration date
14/02/2014
Last edited
25/06/2020
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Signs and Symptoms
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English summary of protocol

Background and study aims
Internet-delivered psychological interventions for people with chronic pain may help increase access to evidence-based psychological treatment in the Irish health service. While the use of internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy programmes have been consistently shown to have small to moderate effects in the management of chronic pain, there is a lack of research regarding the effectiveness of an internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) programme among people with chronic pain. The current study will compare the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of an online ACT intervention with a waiting list control group in terms of the management of pain-related functional interference among people with chronic pain.

Who can participate?
People who are aged 18 years or over, living in Ireland, who report the presence of pain for at least three months duration, and have regular access to a computer and to the internet.

What does the study involve?
The people who decide to take part will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. The experimental group will undergo an eight-session internet-delivered ACT programme over an 8-week period. The ACT programme aims to increase a persons' daily functioning and reduce the interfering effect of pain on doing what matters to him/her. The control group will not receive the internet-delivered ACT intervention at this time, but will be offered the chance to participate in the online ACT programme after the 6-month follow-up assessment. All of the participants will be asked to fill out questionnaires (online) before and after the intervention and at a 6-month follow-up.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Benefits to the participants include access to a free internet-delivered psychological pain management programme; receiving information relating to the management of chronic pain; a greater understanding of the individual's role in pain management; and training in mindfulness techniques tailored for chronic pain. We do not envisage any adverse effects of this treatment.

Where is the study run from?
This study has been organised by National University of Ireland Galway.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
This study is anticipated to start in March 2014 and end in March 2015. Participants will be recruited until September 2014.

Who is funding the study?
Heath Research Board, Dublin (Ireland).

Who is the main contact?
Dr Brian McGuire
brian.mcguire@nuigalway.ie

Contact information

Dr Brian McGuire
Scientific

School of Psychology and Centre for Pain Research
National University of Ireland, Galway
Galway
N/A
Ireland

Email brian.mcguire@nuigalway.ie

Study information

Study designSingle-blind randomised controlled trial
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Other
Study typeTreatment
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details below to request a patient information sheet
Scientific titleComparing the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of an internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention with a waiting list control among adults with chronic pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Study objectives1. The people in the ACT treatment group will report significant improvements on measures of pain intensity, physical functioning, emotional functioning and rating of overall improvement, relative to the waiting list control group
2. The people in the ACT treatment group will report significantly less direct and indirect costs related to their chronic pain relative to the waiting list control group
Ethics approval(s)The National University of Ireland, Galway Research Ethics Committee (REC), 05/04/2012
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studiedPeople with chronic pain
InterventionThe participants will be randomly allocated to one of two conditions:

1. ACT internet-delivered psychological intervention
Eight sessions over an 8-week period. Delivered via the interactive online platform Lifeguide, consisting of information, homework assignments, relevant metaphors and mindfulness exercises. The participants will be reminded to complete each session weekly via a prompt to log on dispatched through the online delivery platform. Participants will also receive three phone calls from a member of the research team throughout the duration of the intervention, after their completion of sessions one, three and seven, respectively.

2. Waiting list control condition
Participants will not receive the internet-delivered ACT intervention at that time. The participants will be contacted by the post-doctoral researcher to explain that they have been allocated to the waiting list control group, at which time the participants will be given an opportunity to ask questions regarding the trial. The waiting list control group will be offered the opportunity to use the online ACT intervention after the 6-month follow-up assessment.
Intervention typeOther
Primary outcome measurePain intensity and pain-related functional interference: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Short form

People in both groups will be assessed pre-treatment, post-treatment (or after 8 weeks for the controls) and there will be a 6-month follow-up for both groups
Secondary outcome measures1. Depression: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
2. Pain-related anxiety: Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20 (PASS-20)
3. Patient Global Impression of Change: Patient Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC)
4. Acceptance of chronic pain: Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8 (CPAQ-8)
5. Health-related quality of life: EQ-5D
6. Health care usage: Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)

All secondary outcomes will be assessed at pre-intervention, post-intervention (or after 8 weeks for the control group) and at 6-month follow-up.
Overall study start date01/03/2014
Completion date01/03/2015

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants126; 63 people per condition
Key inclusion criteria1. Aged 18 years or over
2. The presence of pain for at least three months duration
3. Pain has been assessed by a general practitioner or specialist within the last three months
4. Resident of Ireland
5. Regular access to a computer and to the internet
6. Adequate English language ability
Key exclusion criteria1. Not currently undergoing any other form of psychological intervention for chronic pain
2. Not currently experiencing a psychotic illness
3. Not experiencing chronic pain due to malignancy
Date of first enrolment01/03/2014
Date of final enrolment01/09/2014

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Ireland

Study participating centre

National University of Ireland, Galway
Galway
N/A
Ireland

Sponsor information

National University of Ireland, Galway (Ireland)
University/education

c/o Dr Brian McGuire
School of Psychology and Centre for Pain Research
Galway
N/A
Ireland

Email brian.mcguire@nuigalway.ie
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/03bea9k73

Funders

Funder type

Government

Heath Research Board, Dublin (Ireland)

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareNo
IPD sharing plan summaryNot provided at time of registration
Publication and dissemination planNot provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Study outputs

Output type Details Date created Date added Peer reviewed? Patient-facing?
Protocol article protocol 02/07/2014 Yes No

Editorial Notes

25/06/2020: No publications found.