Subacromial hyaluronic acid injections perform better when combined with exercise-based rehabilitation in the treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome

ISRCTN ISRCTN18380042
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN18380042
Submission date
31/10/2024
Registration date
21/11/2024
Last edited
21/11/2024
Recruitment status
No longer recruiting
Overall study status
Completed
Condition category
Musculoskeletal Diseases
Prospectively registered
Protocol
Statistical analysis plan
Results
Individual participant data
Record updated in last year

Plain English Summary

Background and study aims
This study investigates the effectiveness of combining two treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome (SIAS): subacromial injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) and a specific exercise-based rehabilitation (EBR) program. Shoulder impingement syndrome causes shoulder pain due to the compression of soft tissues around the shoulder joint. This study aims to see if using HA injections alone or with EBR provides better outcomes in terms of pain relief and functional improvement.

Who can participate?
Adults aged 18 years old and over diagnosed with grade I or II SIAS were eligible to participate. Participants needed to be experiencing mild to moderate shoulder pain as confirmed by specific clinical and imaging tests. Patients with severe conditions, prior shoulder surgeries, or specific exclusions such as cognitive impairment were not eligible.

What does the study involve?
Participants were divided into two groups. The first group received three HA injections into the shoulder over six weeks. The second group received the same HA injections along with an intensive, supervised EBR program, consisting of five sessions per week. Both treatments were non-surgical and aimed at relieving pain and improving shoulder function.

What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Participants may experience reduced shoulder pain and improved shoulder movement and strength. HA injections are generally safe, with a low risk of adverse reactions. Exercise therapy may help improve muscle balance and strength, potentially enhancing overall shoulder health. No adverse events were observed during the study for either treatment group.

Where is the study run from?
The study was conducted in a clinical research setting following ethical standards and guidelines.

When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
The study was conducted over several months from June 2011 to July 2013, with participants followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months to assess the effectiveness of the treatments.

Who is funding the study?
This clinical trial does not incur additional costs beyond those associated with standard clinical practice. The interventions and assessments included in the trial align with routine care procedures, ensuring that participation does not impose extra financial burdens on the healthcare system or patients at Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic.

Who is the Main Contact?
Prof. Giuseppe Milano, giuseppe.milano@unibs.it

Contact information

Prof Giuseppe Milano
Public, Scientific, Principal Investigator

Viale Europa 11
Brescia
25123
Italy

ORCiD logoORCID ID 0000-0001-6040-9623
Phone +39 030 393981
Email giuseppe.milano@unibs.it

Study information

Study designBlinded prospective randomized controlled study
Primary study designInterventional
Secondary study designRandomised controlled trial
Study setting(s)Hospital, University/medical school/dental school
Study typeTreatment, Efficacy
Participant information sheet Not available in web format, please use the contact details to request a participant information sheet
Scientific titleComparison between isolated hyaluronic acid injection therapy and combined physical therapy in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy. A randomized prospective clinical study.
Study acronymHA-FKT-SHD
Study hypothesisThe purpose of the present study was to assess the efficacy of HA subacromial injections isolated or combined with individualized exercise-based rehabilitation (EBR) programs as therapeutic regimens for the treatment of SIAS. The study hypothesized that the difference between the two therapeutic regimens is significant.
Ethics approval(s)

Approved 20/06/2011, Catholic University of The Sacred Heart Faculty of Medicine and Surgery "Agostino Gemelli" (Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore Facoltà Di Medicina E Chirurgia "Agostino Gemelli") (Largo Francesco Vito 1, Rome, 00168, Italy; +390630151; comitatoetico.lazioarea3@policlinicogemelli.it), ref: P/480/CE/2011

ConditionSubacromial impingement syndrome
InterventionPatients selected for the study were carefully informed of the expected benefits of the procedures involved. Patients who accepted our invitation to be enlisted in the study signed a disclosure agreement form. Randomization was conducted using a computerized random assignment system. This approach ensures a balanced distribution between the intervention and control groups, minimizing the risk of selection bias.

Patients from group 1 (HA group) underwent treatment by 3 subacromial injections (one every 2 weeks) of high-molecular-weight HA (Orthovisc 2 ml; 15 mg/ml; Anika Therapeutics Inc., Bedford, MA), supplied as sterile, pre-filled syringes. Injections were administered in aseptic conditions with a 21-gauge needle by an experienced physician unaware of the patient’s treatment allocation. In group 2 (HA + EBR group), patients underwent 3 subacromial injections on the affected shoulder by the same protocol used in group 1; furthermore, they underwent a program of five sessions per week of supervised EBR for a total of 20 treatment sessions in a month. Patients were instructed to avoid any additional therapeutic measure for pain management (pharmacological or physical) during the treatment and for the subsequent 6 months. The patients were not instructed during the study about activity or home exercise programs during or following supervised therapy. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 1, 3, and 6 months.
Intervention typeProcedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measureDisease-specific health-related quality of life (QoL) measured using the nationally validated versions of the DASH (Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) questionnaire in its short version (Quick-DASH) at 1, 3, and 6 months
Secondary outcome measuresWorking capacity measured using the DASH work module (Work-DASH) and a functional assessment of the shoulder with the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at 1, 3, and 6 months
Overall study start date01/06/2011
Overall study end date01/07/2013

Eligibility

Participant type(s)Patient
Age groupAdult
Lower age limit18 Years
SexBoth
Target number of participants160
Total final enrolment160
Participant inclusion criteria1. Aged 18 years or older
2. A diagnosis of SIAS grade I or II according to Neer’s classification as diagnosed on clinical examination and imaging studies
Participant exclusion criteria1. Calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff and full-thickness rotator cuff tear
2. Shoulder stiffness
3. Previous fractures and/or surgeries to the same shoulder
4. Long-lasting history of shoulder pain (exceeding 6 months) treated with steroids or NSAIDs
5. Treatment of shoulder pain by EBR or shoulder injections with HA or steroids during the last 6 months
6. Shoulder involvement in congenital or acquired inflammatory or neurological disorders
7. Cognitive or psychiatric impairment
8. Unwillingness or inability to sign informed consent
Recruitment start date01/07/2011
Recruitment end date01/07/2012

Locations

Countries of recruitment

  • Italy

Study participating centre

U.O. di Ortopedia – Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma
Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8
Rome
00136
Italy

Sponsor information

Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic
University/education

Largo Agostino Gemelli 8
Rome
00168
Italy

Phone +39 06 30151
Email protocollo.generale.gemelli@pec.it
Website https://www.policlinicogemelli.it/
ROR logo "ROR" https://ror.org/00rg70c39

Funders

Funder type

Hospital/treatment centre

Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic

No information available

Results and Publications

Intention to publish date31/12/2025
Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to shareYes
IPD sharing plan summaryAvailable on request
Publication and dissemination planPlanned publication in a peer-reviewed journal
IPD sharing planThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study will be available upon request from Prof. Giuseppe Milano, giuseppe.milano@unibs.it. Consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Editorial Notes

31/10/2024: Study's Catholic University of The Sacred Heart Faculty of Medicine and Surgery "Agostino Gemelli" (Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore Facoltà Di Medicina E Chirurgia "Agostino Gemelli").