A comparison of three anaesthetic facemasks used during the induction of general anaesthesia

ISRCTN	ISRCTN19205723
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN19205723
Protocol serial number	N0106136034
Sponsor	Department of Health
Funder	Gloucestershire R&D Consortium (UK)

Prospectively registered

Protocol

Statistical analysis plan

Results

Individual participant data

Plain English summary of protocol

Not provided at time of registration

Dr Jean Waters
Scientific

Consultant Anaesthetist
Department of Anaesthetics
Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
Great Western Road
Gloucester
GL1 3NN
United Kingdom

Primary study design	Interventional
Study design	Randomised controlled trial
Secondary study design	Randomised controlled trial
Scientific title
Study objectives	To compare three different anaesthetic facemasks and to identify the device that provides the best ventilation to the patient
Ethics approval(s)	Not provided at time of registration
Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied	Surgery: Anaesthesia
Intervention	1. Ohmeda black mask 2. Intersurgical anaesthesia mask 3. Air cushion mask All masks used in random order.
Intervention type	Procedure/Surgery
Primary outcome measure(s)	To identify the most efficient make of anaesthetic facemask
Key secondary outcome measure(s)	Not provided at time of registration
Completion date	06/05/2004

Participant type(s)	Patient
Age group	Adult
Sex	Not Specified
Target sample size at registration	60
Key inclusion criteria	60 consecutive adult patients above 16 years of age who are undergoing elective surgery
Key exclusion criteria	Not provided at time of registration
Date of first enrolment	06/02/2004
Date of final enrolment	06/05/2004

Consultant Anaesthetist

Gloucester
GL1 3NN
United Kingdom

Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share	No
IPD sharing plan summary	Not provided at time of registration
IPD sharing plan

Output type	Details	Date created	Date added	Peer reviewed?	Patient-facing?
Results article	results	01/10/2006		Yes	No