Safety and feasibility evaluation of tourniquets for total knee replacement study
| ISRCTN | ISRCTN20873088 |
|---|---|
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN20873088 |
| Protocol serial number | 20280 |
| Sponsor | University of Warwick |
| Funder | National Institute for Health Research |
- Submission date
- 17/02/2016
- Registration date
- 17/02/2016
- Last edited
- 25/01/2021
- Recruitment status
- No longer recruiting
- Overall study status
- Completed
- Condition category
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
Plain English summary of protocol
Background and study aims
The majority of surgeons perform total knee replacement surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. The tourniquet interrupts the blood supply and drainage from the leg and helps to create a bloodless area for the surgery to take place. A tourniquet may however increase a patients’ risk of developing a blood clot. At the end of surgery the tourniquet is deflated and blood clots that may have accumulated in the leg are immediately free to flow (embolise) within the blood stream. In some cases, blood clots and debris can return to the heart where they are then free to travel to the brain. This risk has never been examined with any definitive clinical study and it’s not known if such a study would even be feasible. This is what this study is investigating.
Who can participate?
Adults about to have a total knee replacement at University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS trust.
What does the study involve?
Participants are randomly allocated to one of two groups. Those in group 1 have their total knee replacement surgery with a tourniquet. Those in group 2 have their surgery without a tourniquet. They all have a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scan of their brain before having surgery and afterwards to look for evidence of clots and debris in the brain. Some participants and surgeons taking part in the study are also invited to take part in an interview to discuss their views and opinions of the of the study and how acceptable they find it. Participants are also followed-up within a year of their surgery when they are asked about how much knee pain they are experiencing and the how well the replacement joint is functioning. The researchers involved in this study also collect data from an existing database of total knee replacement surgery in England and Wales (National Joint Registry-NJR) and map it to other existing databases of deaths and hospital reported blood clots.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating?
Not provided at time of registration
Where is the study run from?
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS trust
When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for?
January 2017 to June 2018
Who is funding the study?
National Institute for Health Research (UK)
Who is the main contact?
Mr Peter Wall
Contact information
Public
University of Warwick
Clinical Sciences Research Institute
Clinical Sciences Building
Clifford Bridge Road
Coventry
CV2 2DX
United Kingdom
| 0000-0003-3149-3373 |
Study information
| Primary study design | Interventional |
|---|---|
| Study design | Interventional and Observational; Design type: Treatment, Qualitative |
| Secondary study design | Randomised controlled trial |
| Study type | Participant information sheet |
| Scientific title | Safety and feasibility evaluation of tourniquets for Total Knee Replacement (SAFE-TKR): A pilot feasibility study |
| Study acronym | SAFE-TKR |
| Study objectives | Current study hypothesis as of 08/10/2018: This is a study designed to determine if a full randomised controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes following total knee replacement (TKR) surgery with or without a tourniquet is feasible Previous study hypothesis: This is a pilot trial investigating whether a full randomised controlled trial comparing the risk of blood clots developing after total knee replacement (TKR) surgery for patients that have a tourniquet applied during surgery verses those that do not is feasible. |
| Ethics approval(s) | West Midlands - Edgbaston Research Ethics Committee, 16/12/2015, ref: 15/WM/0455 |
| Health condition(s) or problem(s) studied | Topic: Musculoskeletal disorders, Surgery; Subtopic: Musculoskeletal (all Subtopics), Surgery; Disease: Elective Orthopaedic Surgery, All Surgery |
| Intervention | This feasibility study will comprise of three parts: 1. Patients due for TKR surgery will invited to take part in a pilot trial and randomised to surgery with or without a tourniquet with a view to recruiting 50 patients. All patients will undergo a Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging scan of their brain before and after surgery to look for evidence of clots and debris in the brain. Other potentially important outcomes including knee pain and function within 12 months will also be collected. 2. Integrated qualitative research study. An interview study of around 30 patients and around 20 surgeons will capture the views and opinions of both groups regarding the acceptability of the pilot trial. 3. Retrospective multi-centre cohort study. A study of an existing database of TKR surgery in England and Wales (National Joint Registry-NJR) will be undertaken. The data will be mapped to other existing databases of deaths and hospital reported blood clots. |
| Intervention type | Other |
| Primary outcome measure(s) |
Primary outcome as of 04/05/2017: |
| Key secondary outcome measure(s) |
Current secondary outcome measures as of 08/10/2018: |
| Completion date | 31/01/2019 |
Eligibility
| Participant type(s) | Patient |
|---|---|
| Age group | Adult |
| Lower age limit | 18 Years |
| Sex | All |
| Target sample size at registration | 50 |
| Total final enrolment | 53 |
| Key inclusion criteria | Inclusion criteria as of 04/05/2017: 1. Patients must be aged 18 years and over 2. Patient is undergoing primary unilateral knee replacement 3. The patient is able to give written informed consent and participate fully in the trial interventions and follow up procedures Original inclusion criteria: 1. All patients undergoing an elective primary unilateral cemented total knee replacement (TKR) under the care of four orthopaedic consultants at University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire (UHCW) NHS trust 2. Male and Female 3. Lower age limit 18 years |
| Key exclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria as of 04/05/2017: 1. Patients for whom Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging is contraindicated due to 1.1. None compliant heart pacemaker or defibrillator or 1.2. None compliant metallic foreign body e.g. in one or both eyes or aneurysm clips in the brain or 1.3. Claustrophobia (e.g. difficulty in an elevator or telephone box) 2. Patients not suitable for a thigh tourniquet (e.g. significant peripheral vascular disease) 3. Previous participation in the SAFE-TKR Trial Original exclusion criteria: 1. Patients who lack capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 2. Patients for whom Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging is either contraindicated (heart pacemaker, metallic foreign body in one or both eyes, or who have an aneurysm clip in their brain) or not feasible because of claustrophobia |
| Date of first enrolment | 07/04/2017 |
| Date of final enrolment | 01/03/2018 |
Locations
Countries of recruitment
- United Kingdom
- England
Study participating centres
Clinical Sciences Building
Clifford Bridge Road
Coventry
CV2 2DX
United Kingdom
Coventry, West Midlands
CV2 2DX
United Kingdom
Results and Publications
| Individual participant data (IPD) Intention to share | No |
|---|---|
| IPD sharing plan summary | Data sharing statement to be made available at a later date |
| IPD sharing plan |
Study outputs
| Output type | Details | Date created | Date added | Peer reviewed? | Patient-facing? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Results article | results | 22/01/2021 | 25/01/2021 | Yes | No |
| Protocol article | protocol | 10/04/2018 | 30/11/2020 | Yes | No |
| HRA research summary | 28/06/2023 | No | No | ||
| Participant information sheet | Participant information sheet | 11/11/2025 | 11/11/2025 | No | Yes |
Editorial Notes
25/01/2021: Publication reference added.
30/11/2020: Publication reference added.
12/05/2020: The following changes were made to the trial record:
1. The overall end date was changed from 31/12/2020 to 31/01/2019.
2. The total final enrolment was added.
08/10/2018: The following changes have been made to the trial record:
1. The study hypothesis has been updated
2. The secondary outcome measures have been updated
3. The recruitment end date has been changed from 01/08/2018 to 01/03/2018
04/05/2017: The inclusion and exclusion criteria and outcome measures have been updated. In addition, the recruitment start date has been updated from 01/02/2017 to 07/04/2017.
24/02/2016: Study status verified with principal investigator.